Why do Republicans bash socialism - when it's all around them?

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong .

It is an accurate and true statement

Socialism is only one form of government

Socialism is also only one form of social order.

Those are facts you are wrong and ignorant

Capitalism cannot "enforce any social order" only Capital order.

i am right and you are wrong. it really is a simple as that.

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

 

[JustAGuy1]

So why have the states of California, Oregon and Washington not solved simple poverty and homelessness. These states have done nothing to alleviate the issue. go ahead, we are all waiting for you to prove they can.

You prove it every time you reply with fallacy instead of valid arguments.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

What is the fallacy? I asked you for specific example how left wing solutions have solved the homeless and poverty in California, Washington and Oregon and you have given nothing, zip, nada, zero. Every time, you make excuses or blame other people. I can argue with an idiot that can't give one damn example of their left wing fantasy working, I just get moronic stupid blather and blaming others for the left's failure. All you are doing is trolling, any with an IQ above 30 can see that, which maybe three times higher than your IQ.

still not dumb enough for the story manufacturing right wing?

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Would we still have a homeless problem?

If you think unemployment will pay for housing you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

why do you say that?

why wouldn't rational left wingers not "get socially communal with housing expenses".

only the more national socialist right wing, "eschews Capitalism at Every opportunity" for their bigotry of socialism on a national basis.

LOL, because it won't kid. Not in the US anyway. Hey, I know.....try Venezuela.

 

[JustAGuy1]

dear, you have no facts, only fantasy.

Loser I have facts you have lies and you you know this is true

you are too inferior to take seriously.

I am superior to you and you lack the intellect to make a valid argument

lol. you need valid arguments to discover sublime Truth (value) discoverable through argumentation.

Nothing is more noble, nothing more venerable than fidelity. Faithfulness and truth are the most sacred excellences and endowments of the human mind.

Marcus Tullius Cicero

You have no valid arguments

You have only made up stupid and false definitions which is not a valid argument .

Which proves you are inferior and a stupid loser.

He's quite young.

 

[dblack]

Wrong .

It is an accurate and true statement

Socialism is only one form of government

Socialism is also only one form of social order.

Those are facts you are wrong and ignorant

Capitalism cannot "enforce any social order" only Capital order.

i am right and you are wrong. it really is a simple as that.

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Piss off, tr-oll.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism cannot "enforce any social order" only Capital order.

i am right and you are wrong. it really is a simple as that.

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

 

[dblack]

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

Piss off, troll.

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism cannot "enforce any social order" only Capital order.

i am right and you are wrong. it really is a simple as that.

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Piss off, tr-oll.

piss off, og-re.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

Piss off, troll.

you first, ogre.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Social order can be enforced by any form of government not just socialist governments

I have proven you are wrong ignorant and uneducated

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

 

[dblack]

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

Piss off, troll.

you first, ogre.

Piss off, troll.

 

[Papageorgio]

So you lied, no solutions, nothing in progress. If you told me early on that the left had no solutions,we could have saved a lot of time. At least you admit the left has no answers

No, i simply didn't dumb it down enough for the clueless and Causeless right wing.

Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's natural of unemployment is a simple solution in our at-will employment States.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

So why have the states of California, Oregon and Washington not solved simple poverty and homelessness. These states have done nothing to alleviate the issue. go ahead, we are all waiting for you to prove they can.

You prove it every time you reply with fallacy instead of valid arguments.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

What is the fallacy? I asked you for specific example how left wing solutions have solved the homeless and poverty in California, Washington and Oregon and you have given nothing, zip, nada, zero. Every time, you make excuses or blame other people. I can argue with an idiot that can't give one damn example of their left wing fantasy working, I just get moronic stupid blather and blaming others for the left's failure. All you are doing is trolling, any with an IQ above 30 can see that, which maybe three times higher than your IQ.

still not dumb enough for the story manufacturing right wing?

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Would we still have a homeless problem?

It seems you forgot your argument, fortunately I can get you back on track.

You all have nothing but simple rejection not any form of valid refutation. Go ahead and be mere tyrants with your majority.

You said “The left has solutions not excuses.”

Then I said, “Left solutions like LA, Seattle, San Francisco, Portland, Baltimore, Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit? They created poverty, high crime, homelessness and disease. Seems like the left solutions just exacerbate the problems.”

So please, kindly answer why in left wing areas why are problems getting worse, rather than getting better? Thank you, in advance for answering my question and not giving excuses.

 

[Dr Grump]

A mixture does not work either

As we have been told many of those people do come from socialist nations in fact not just Mexico

Yes it does. Easily provable.

Which ones are socialist besides Venezuela (and not many are coming from there)...

 

[Soupnazi630]

A mixture does not work either

As we have been told many of those people do come from socialist nations in fact not just Mexico

Yes it does. Easily provable.

Which ones are socialist besides Venezuela (and not many are coming from there)...

No it is not provable at all

As many as can afford to come here from venezuela

 

[danielpalos]

There is no Government without socialism.

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

 

[danielpalos]

No, i simply didn't dumb it down enough for the clueless and Causeless right wing.

Solving for simple poverty by solving for capitalism's natural of unemployment is a simple solution in our at-will employment States.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

So why have the states of California, Oregon and Washington not solved simple poverty and homelessness. These states have done nothing to alleviate the issue. go ahead, we are all waiting for you to prove they can.

You prove it every time you reply with fallacy instead of valid arguments.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

What is the fallacy? I asked you for specific example how left wing solutions have solved the homeless and poverty in California, Washington and Oregon and you have given nothing, zip, nada, zero. Every time, you make excuses or blame other people. I can argue with an idiot that can't give one damn example of their left wing fantasy working, I just get moronic stupid blather and blaming others for the left's failure. All you are doing is trolling, any with an IQ above 30 can see that, which maybe three times higher than your IQ.

still not dumb enough for the story manufacturing right wing?

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Would we still have a homeless problem?

It seems you forgot your argument, fortunately I can get you back on track.

You all have nothing but simple rejection not any form of valid refutation. Go ahead and be mere tyrants with your majority.

You said “The left has solutions not excuses.”

Then I said, “Left solutions like LA, Seattle, San Francisco, Portland, Baltimore, Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit? They created poverty, high crime, homelessness and disease. Seems like the left solutions just exacerbate the problems.”

So please, kindly answer why in left wing areas why are problems getting worse, rather than getting better? Thank you, in advance for answering my question and not giving excuses.

Thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

 

[Papageorgio]

So why have the states of California, Oregon and Washington not solved simple poverty and homelessness. These states have done nothing to alleviate the issue. go ahead, we are all waiting for you to prove they can.

You prove it every time you reply with fallacy instead of valid arguments.

What problems can you come up with, story teller, to make such a simple solution fail.

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

What is the fallacy? I asked you for specific example how left wing solutions have solved the homeless and poverty in California, Washington and Oregon and you have given nothing, zip, nada, zero. Every time, you make excuses or blame other people. I can argue with an idiot that can't give one damn example of their left wing fantasy working, I just get moronic stupid blather and blaming others for the left's failure. All you are doing is trolling, any with an IQ above 30 can see that, which maybe three times higher than your IQ.

still not dumb enough for the story manufacturing right wing?

The scenario is, Labor can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment States.

Would we still have a homeless problem?

It seems you forgot your argument, fortunately I can get you back on track.

You all have nothing but simple rejection not any form of valid refutation. Go ahead and be mere tyrants with your majority.

You said “The left has solutions not excuses.”

Then I said, “Left solutions like LA, Seattle, San Francisco, Portland, Baltimore, Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit? They created poverty, high crime, homelessness and disease. Seems like the left solutions just exacerbate the problems.”

So please, kindly answer why in left wing areas why are problems getting worse, rather than getting better? Thank you, in advance for answering my question and not giving excuses.

Thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

Lol! Tell what the left that has only solutions, solution is? No telling others the solution? California, Oregon and Washington and the cities there in could pay people to be unemployed, but none have chosen to do so, they are free to enact the same law Finland did, the on that paid people to be unemployed but after two years they declared it a failure. The other big point left winger, homelessness is not a money issue, it is a mental health issue. Again, give me the left wing solutions that for because you claim the left has solutions and no excuses.

 

[danielpalos]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes there is

Most governments are not socialist and socialism is not all government in any model or text book or encyclopedia

It is also a consistent failure hence our rejection of it

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

 

[Soupnazi630]

i already told you what the proposed solution is.

No you have not you only ran away from the question and are now lying.

As usual

 

[danielpalos]

Which Government is not a form of social-ism.

Most of them including ours

The social Power to Tax is a form of socialism not capitalism.
next.

There is no social power to tax and never has been

Taxes are taken by government force in every form of government and socialism is only one form of government

You have to be right once to say next and you have been consistently wrong

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about Any Thing, serious.

The Congress shall have Power

That is the Socialism part of our social Contract and Republican form of Government.

Once again this is not about left or right wing it is about basic facts which you are out right denying.

But in fact yes half of the nation takes them seriously

We have no social contract and much like socialism your delusional manufactured definitions are false

dear, social Power is a social construct not a capital, voluntary agreement.