Why do geniuses seem to have disappeared

MayorQuimby

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2024
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
1,425
Points
208
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.
 
1760485268289.webp


~S~
 
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.
The Dark Ages followed the fall of Rome. Actually, the Classical period of genius in science and philosophy came from Greece. Rome stole pretty much all of Greece including religion and art.

What is really interesting is that after the fall of Rome, not a single one of the cultures and people they conquered and civilized took up the mantle and plodded on with civilization. Britian went all the way back to the Bronze age and had to claw civilization back out of peat bogs.

We do have, if not geniuses today, then at least genius IQs. Elon Musk is a genius, so was Steve Jobs but he's dead. As for Genius IQs they are around. James Woods is a genius, so is, if you can believe it, Ashton Kutcher. We certainly don't have Mozart level musical inventiveness, nor the art of a Da Vinci, but in some cases we don't know. William Shakespear was a hack, he wrote for the masses, he was commercial TV before there was commercial TV.

Why don't we have those kinds of intellects anymore? For one thing, we don't educate for it. What passes for a classical education today? Actually, nothing.

The minds of the restoration, hmmm. What was restored? Did you ever stop to wonder, what was it that was being restored during the crawl from the Dark Ages? It was the classical thinking gathered up from Rome and Greece. It was Western Civilization. The thinkers of Plato and Socrates, the philosophy of Marcus Aurelias. Hip Hop doesn't count.

Perhaps THESE are the dark ages and another people will have to find genius.
 
Musk and Jobs aren't geniuses; they are merely successful entrepreneurs.
 
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.
ever watch ideocracy, can't spell not sure if that is right.
 
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.

Maybe they disappear because they've discovered the secret of invisibility. They are geniuses, after all.

That's all I got.
 
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.

I know you might take this personal.

Please don't.

Some of us can barely keep up with a post that is broken up into chewable pieces. (ME)

Paragraphs please.
 
What is a genius? Every mother thinks her child is a genius but how do you determine it? Edison was a genius who created inventions that made the world better but Einstein was a genius in a narrow field that pretty much endangered all human life. Can politicians be considered geniuses? Not if they are republicans.
 
I came across a person's blog, on which he talks about why geniuses seem to have disappeared. So below are my thoughts:

Geniuses are born, not made. This means whatever caused the genius to be a genius, it's almost certainly his genes. Now, humans came out of the ice age, an extremely harsh environment. What this environment did, was it selected for extremely high levels of intelligence, which is what genius is made of. Now, back then, because the environment was so harsh, people were too busy trying to survive, they did not have the time nor energy nor resources to develop art, science, civilization, or even society. But what we do know is that the human gene pool started out really "excellently". Which is why when we look at the antiquity period, there were so many notable thinkers and philosophers. And then, Christianity came. Christianity was good in the sense that it stabilized society, as it generally encouraged good, moral people to reproduce more than they otherwise would have. However, one drawback of Christianity was that it killed the advancement of human knowledge. Which is why after the golden era of the classical period, we see the Dark ages. And then, Renaissance came. If I were to guess (note this is a big guess), the reason Renaissance happened because by then, human populations had grown big enough that geniuses were born frequently enough, such that there were enough eminent thinkers and inventers whose breakthroughs caused Christianity to give way to Rationality. And then, these breakthroughs and discoveries built upon one another to allow populations to grow even bigger, to the point where they became "too big". Now, what do I mean by that? Well, remember we said earlier that genius is caused by genes. What this means, in order for someone to be a genius, he needs to have two copies of genes, one from each parent. When two parents are geniuses, it is likely that the child will be a genius, too. And when only one parent is a genius, the resultant child's level of intelligence will be "dragged down" a bit by the non-genius parent. In other words, his genius genes are diluted. When you have so many geniuses making so many discoveries that enabled populations to grow too big, what will happen is that geniuses will have a hard time finding and reproducing with one another. They will likely mate with someone who is merely intelligent, but not a genius. So, this results in a non-genius level child. And the bigger the population, the more severe this phenomenon gets. So, genius requires the population to be big enough for it to manifest, but the population must not be too big, otherwise it paradoxically kills off the phenomenon of genius. So here's my theory. Thank you.



They took off with the money and the girl.
 
clearly they have been body snatched by some evil scientist ..

 
He wasn't an engineer, he wasn't a genius, he was just an auto mechanic from New Jersey.



51daf277a2171fa4769c2d04c1beef5b.jpg
U.S. Army Sergeant Curtis G. Culin III is credited with inventing the "Rhino" hedgerow cutter, a field modification that allowed Allied tanks to break through the thick hedgerows of Normandy during World War II.
 
15th post
Musk and Jobs aren't geniuses; they are merely successful entrepreneurs.
Perhaps we should have more. There is a lot of corruption and a waste of resources on this planet in richer nations and much of the resources goes to the top class in poorer ones. We are a high tax nation with many people getting paid checks and benefits which takes away from having more entrepreneurs. We have many who create things and some for some reason are buried as it would affect things we already have financially/economically. Even in the past when electric power was starting to spread to people. There was the way we went and some questions that Tesla posed. Today we are talking about Tesla a little more.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom