Why do Democrats want a lawless society?

[martybegan]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

If we are assigning the thoughts of a few to the entire group, you'd have to consider him a hero too then, right?

Please find and ID posters who aren't actual Nazis on this board who call that cop a hero.

 

[j-mac]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

I don't know who thanked the poster or not. Obviously you've been keeping track. Since that is the case, can you post to the link with the comment with the "seven" likes?

That was tried in 1861. How'd that work out?

And yet, those in the far left that are now acting out, seem to want that to happen again.

 

[candycorn]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

Yet we began our conversation here with you stating this in post #52...

Candycorn: " He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike."

No...the "all you guys think alike" started in post #1. I just put the shoe on the other foot.

 

[candycorn]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

If we are assigning the thoughts of a few to the entire group, you'd have to consider him a hero too then, right?

Please find and ID posters who aren't actual Nazis on this board who call that cop a hero.

quarantine is a Nazi?

 

[Norman]

Because it is a religion by losers for losers. Losers and envious bigots want to see society burn and criminals taking control.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

During the impeachment, Democrats lectured all of us that "No one is above the law". Evidently, that policy has changed. Hypocritical moonbats.

"Folks, Democrats have two sets of rules: one set for them, and another set for the rest of us."
Rush Limbaugh

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

If politics is that big a part of your life, you've got MUCH bigger problems than who your neighbor is. You need mental help. Now.

But lets see just how crazy you are...

How does the split you envision take place geographically? Is Wisconsin part of Conservistan based on the 2016 election?

My idea is that we split the country form north to south, giving equal land mass to both sides. I would suggest that the leftists take the west side of the country, since their beloved Mexican and southern American immigrants can take advantage of their open border policies.

We would keep the east side of the country. If Democrats and liberals had to move out, my property values would double or triple overnight. The downfall to that is we would have to layoff a good number of police officers. Our home alarm companies would suffer as well. Because of lack of occupation, we would also have to layoff jailers and prison guards, perhaps even close many of our prisons. But like you, we will have to deal with those problems as well.

On your side of the country, you can tax businesses and rich people to no ends. Of course they would quickly move to our side of the country, but that's something you'd have to deal with. Between immigrants, welfare people, free college, repartitions for black people, your side would collapse in a matter of a few years. That's why we will build a huge Trump wall to keep you out when that happens.

What people on your side want is a place where nobody has money except the government. All jobs pay equal regardless of what occupation one has. Nobody has firearms except the government. Free healthcare, and working is optional. Free food is included.

We already have places like this in our country. We call them prisons, and they are mostly populated with other Democrats. It's not hard to get into them either.

Would the "conservative" side of the land mass be based on delusions like the ones you just wrote?

What's delusional about it? Everything I wrote would come true.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

During the impeachment, Democrats lectured all of us that "No one is above the law". Evidently, that policy has changed. Hypocritical moonbats.

Blacks are definitely above the law.

 

[White 6]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Your last sentence says it all.

The Dems will be having their way in just a few months.

I suspect that President Biden will not want to prosecute President Trump for something, but his BLM supporters will insist on it. It would not surprise me if they try to pin something on the First Lady, too.

How ironic! BLM is actually helping to promote the idea that this country should be divided up, as was Yugoslavia.

Unfortunately, dividing the country up is the only way to save our Republic.

The left went from Democrats to liberals, from liberals to progressives, from progressives to Democrat-Socialists (Whatever TF that's supposed to be). On this path they will go from Democrat-Socialists to plain Socialists. Then it they will go from Socialists to Socialist-Communists, and finally plain old Communists.

I never heard that BLM's agenda was a divided country. If it is, please provide proof of your claim. I would gladly support that stance even if it is theirs.

They want to divide the country not to have two separate countries but to CONTROL 100% of the country and people. This is all about control, and oppression by the Left.

Correct, and that is why I suggest saving at least part of the Republic by dividing us into two countries instead of having one that will eventually be dominated by Socialism and eventually Communism. There is only one Untied States of America. Once this place is gone, there is no other United States to run to. It will be gone forever. So we need to have at least half of the country to continue what our founders created.

Mind you, this is not really my idea. This is what I call Mom's Law. When my siblings and I fought and argued as children, my mother would place us in separate rooms to stop the commotion. Eventually we learned to get along so we could continue playing together in one room of the house.

If we divided the country, the liberal side would collapse in a matter of a few years. Nobody would want to be a police officer there. Half of their country would be loaded up on what is now illegal narcotics. The citizens would not be able to protect themselves without firearms. Businesses would quickly move to our side of the country because of extremely high taxation. That means no jobs, and their country could not support most of their citizenry on welfare programs. It would collapse. And with all of southern America with extremely poor and uneducated people rushing in, their demise would be unavoidable.

Within a few years, the Democrat side would be on their knees begging us to be one country again, and have to capitulate to our way of doing things. It's like what Rush Limbaugh said so many times: You cannot convince people they are wrong. They have to decide they are wrong themselves. All you can do is help them to come to that conclusion.

Separating our country would do exactly what Rush said.

You used to be normal but right-wing trump supporter. Now you are for dissolving the 50 state union? What a quitter.

What choice do we have? The Democrats are ushering in foreigners to takeover the country. That can't be stopped. So the best thing we can do is to create two countries instead of having one. Is it not better to salvage half the country than to surrender it entirely????

Not to mention the requests for more foreign workers by Lindsey Graham and some other republicans last week. But, even Lindsey and Moscow Mitch are not that far gone. You haven't crossed over to the Putin side have you? It was little Nikita of Russia that said the US would fall from within without firing a shot. Calm down dude. Buck up. Do not be fearful and give up.
View attachment 347869

I'm not giving up which is why my stance is to have two countries. By Democrats playing Santa Clause, they are making a larger and larger segment of our population irresponsible and government dependent. I'm taking advantage of that. I've been a landlord for over 25 years now. I've never seen the rental market this strong as it's been the last several years. It's not only where I live, but across the entire country.

Why is this happening? Because younger people today don't want the responsibilities of home ownership. It's such a vast contrast to when I was younger and owning your own home was at the top of your list of accomplishments in life. Because of supply and demand, some cities have offered rent control laws to keep prices down.

As our governments eliminate responsibility, they draw in more and more people to the Socialist/ Communist side. It's like a cancer with no cure, and the Democrats are pushing for free healthcare, paid college, paid personal time off from work and so on. Keep removing personal responsibility from people, and they will rely on government for just about everything right down to what they are allowed to eat. Mooochelle Obama is a prime example of that.

Congratulations. You are an enemy of the The United States of America. Have a nice day Ray.

If I didn't know any better, I'd say you are an enemy of America, and with good reason. You support RIOTING, LOOTING, BURNING DOWN BUSINESSES, KILLING POLICE, OCCUPYING CITY BLOCKS AS TERRORISTS do.

Seattle 'autonomous zone' has armed guards, local businesses being threatened with extortion, police say

The Seattle Police Department is working to forge negotiations with the leaders of a self-declared autonomous zone that includes a now-closed police precinct, as police say they receive reports of armed guards and potential extortion in the region.

www.foxnews.com

The DEMOCRAT PARTY needs to be identified as a TERRORIST ORGANIZATION, period. You people are OUT OF ******* CONTROL, and the good people of America need to shut you shit stains down.

If I didn't know any better I would say you were a trumper nutball, as I have never given any support to rioters, looters, arsenist, etc and believe you probably know this, but were not taught better than to make wild, unsupported statements at home. Oh, I guess I don't know any better, because that is what you just did. Maybe you are just trying to keep up you image as a trump internet guy and wild lying statements not based in fact is what people who support the master do. Good luck going after those Democrats. As for independent like myself, I guess you are just screwed. We will tell you the truth whether you want to hear it or not. We don't have a over made up, lying child to follow and you can't shut us down, just because you do not even like truth anymore. People who called themselves conservatives used to be OK, but it has become like a hog farmer started mixing pure $hit in with the feed to make it go farther and the pigs didn't even notice. Now they thrive on pure $hit and it has gone straight to their brain. Good luck with your central government strongman crackdown campaign, while Bonespurs is still in office to lead your little army, that has lost touch with constitutional norms. states rights, local governance, freedom from oppression,ect., $hit For Brains.

 

[candycorn]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

If politics is that big a part of your life, you've got MUCH bigger problems than who your neighbor is. You need mental help. Now.

But lets see just how crazy you are...

How does the split you envision take place geographically? Is Wisconsin part of Conservistan based on the 2016 election?

My idea is that we split the country form north to south, giving equal land mass to both sides. I would suggest that the leftists take the west side of the country, since their beloved Mexican and southern American immigrants can take advantage of their open border policies.

We would keep the east side of the country. If Democrats and liberals had to move out, my property values would double or triple overnight. The downfall to that is we would have to layoff a good number of police officers. Our home alarm companies would suffer as well. Because of lack of occupation, we would also have to layoff jailers and prison guards, perhaps even close many of our prisons. But like you, we will have to deal with those problems as well.

On your side of the country, you can tax businesses and rich people to no ends. Of course they would quickly move to our side of the country, but that's something you'd have to deal with. Between immigrants, welfare people, free college, repartitions for black people, your side would collapse in a matter of a few years. That's why we will build a huge Trump wall to keep you out when that happens.

What people on your side want is a place where nobody has money except the government. All jobs pay equal regardless of what occupation one has. Nobody has firearms except the government. Free healthcare, and working is optional. Free food is included.

We already have places like this in our country. We call them prisons, and they are mostly populated with other Democrats. It's not hard to get into them either.

Would the "conservative" side of the land mass be based on delusions like the ones you just wrote?

What's delusional about it? Everything I wrote would come true.

Conservistan would fold very quickly for one thing. Hate is divisive. You are proving it with this folly. And hate is the national currency of Conservistan.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

If politics is that big a part of your life, you've got MUCH bigger problems than who your neighbor is. You need mental help. Now.

But lets see just how crazy you are...

How does the split you envision take place geographically? Is Wisconsin part of Conservistan based on the 2016 election?

My idea is that we split the country form north to south, giving equal land mass to both sides. I would suggest that the leftists take the west side of the country, since their beloved Mexican and southern American immigrants can take advantage of their open border policies.

We would keep the east side of the country. If Democrats and liberals had to move out, my property values would double or triple overnight. The downfall to that is we would have to layoff a good number of police officers. Our home alarm companies would suffer as well. Because of lack of occupation, we would also have to layoff jailers and prison guards, perhaps even close many of our prisons. But like you, we will have to deal with those problems as well.

On your side of the country, you can tax businesses and rich people to no ends. Of course they would quickly move to our side of the country, but that's something you'd have to deal with. Between immigrants, welfare people, free college, repartitions for black people, your side would collapse in a matter of a few years. That's why we will build a huge Trump wall to keep you out when that happens.

What people on your side want is a place where nobody has money except the government. All jobs pay equal regardless of what occupation one has. Nobody has firearms except the government. Free healthcare, and working is optional. Free food is included.

We already have places like this in our country. We call them prisons, and they are mostly populated with other Democrats. It's not hard to get into them either.

Would the "conservative" side of the land mass be based on delusions like the ones you just wrote?

What's delusional about it? Everything I wrote would come true.

Conservistan would fold very quickly for one thing. Hate is divisive. You are proving it with this folly. And hate is the national currency of Conservistan.

How would it fold? We would have way less crime, way more jobs, no illegals to drain our taxpayers, no idiotic costly environmental policies that don't change anything, much safer neighborhoods, no more riots and looting, it would be fantastic All these problems you people cause that we won't have to deal with any longer. There is nothing hateful about my idea. In fact if anything, it would reduce hate. We wouldn't have to put up with each other. In your schools you can teach children they can be any gender they desire, and in ours we will teach God and religion.

 

[Pilot1]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

If politics is that big a part of your life, you've got MUCH bigger problems than who your neighbor is. You need mental help. Now.

But lets see just how crazy you are...

How does the split you envision take place geographically? Is Wisconsin part of Conservistan based on the 2016 election?

My idea is that we split the country form north to south, giving equal land mass to both sides. I would suggest that the leftists take the west side of the country, since their beloved Mexican and southern American immigrants can take advantage of their open border policies.

We would keep the east side of the country. If Democrats and liberals had to move out, my property values would double or triple overnight. The downfall to that is we would have to layoff a good number of police officers. Our home alarm companies would suffer as well. Because of lack of occupation, we would also have to layoff jailers and prison guards, perhaps even close many of our prisons. But like you, we will have to deal with those problems as well.

On your side of the country, you can tax businesses and rich people to no ends. Of course they would quickly move to our side of the country, but that's something you'd have to deal with. Between immigrants, welfare people, free college, repartitions for black people, your side would collapse in a matter of a few years. That's why we will build a huge Trump wall to keep you out when that happens.

What people on your side want is a place where nobody has money except the government. All jobs pay equal regardless of what occupation one has. Nobody has firearms except the government. Free healthcare, and working is optional. Free food is included.

We already have places like this in our country. We call them prisons, and they are mostly populated with other Democrats. It's not hard to get into them either.

Would the "conservative" side of the land mass be based on delusions like the ones you just wrote?

What's delusional about it? Everything I wrote would come true.

Conservistan would fold very quickly for one thing. Hate is divisive. You are proving it with this folly. And hate is the national currency of Conservistan.

Really? We want to be left alone. Not ban and confiscate everything we don't like. Also, we aren't trying to FORCE our Communist will on others like you are. Look what is happening now the LEFT, ANTIFA and BLM being VIOLENT, destructive, rioting, looting burning and DIVIDING. They are illegally taking over parts of cities. You are clueless as usual.

 

[BS Filter]

Antifa and BLM are going to kill each other off unless conservatives step in. Kinda like the nazis and commies in WWII.

 

[LuckyDuck]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Okay, let's break this down.
1. ICE/CUSTOMS/BORDER CONTROL/COAST GUARD: All are unwanted by the left. Reason: Many of the politicians that rant about these agencies, do so because they are puppets of the George Soros, "Free Movement of Peoples" movement. In this, there are no longer borders, just people moving from location to location without governmental interference. Some other politicians are pro-Marxist/Leninist ideologs. They believe in a one-party, all reaching, government that controls all aspects in our lives....."for our own good." Then there are a few on the left (old school Democrats) that just want all social services falling under the purview of the government, even though it's never been efficient and the elderly suffer for it.
2. Cuts in our military budget. Here again, we are looking at a couple of elements. One being, that the naïve think the military should not receive massive funding, no matter what threats we might face, as the money in their eyes could be better spent on social services. The sort of Kumbaya crowd....formerly looked at as hippies. The other bunch are far more sinister. Communist Chinese agents and home grown Marxists have been growing here for decades. These individuals have gotten into our public and some private educational systems, spewing the Marxist ideology to young minds. It sounds like some nutty conspiracy theory....if only it were. The goal is to weaken the US through any and all means necessary. Presently, we have a presidential candidate who is so in bed with China, it's not funny and at one recent town hall, he publicly stated on camera that..."we don't need a standing army." China, seeing the growth of Marxism/Leninism here, is concerned that open rebellion by armed civilians might occur in the face of Communisms' growth here and has publicly stated that firearms in the hands of Americans is a problem. They don't want to see their work undermined by patriotic civilians.
3. I've kind of addressed the disarming of Americans briefly in my second paragraph. The left's politicians know that many millions of American citizens aren't out committing crimes with their firearms and that it's just the criminal and mentally disturbed elements that commit crimes with the firearms. To them, that isn't the point. If we look at each individual case of "mass shootings," we will find that the shooters were, for the most part, lefties, while others were mentally unstable teens, or terrorists. Your average citizen has no interest in committing crimes with guns. They hunt, use them for sport shooting, or just prefer to have a bit of personal security, should someone break into their homes at night. Others, like myself, I've been around guns since I was a kid and served a career in the military and know the true purpose of the Second Amendment. Anyway, the left and far left know that by disarming the American populace, you won't stop criminals from committing crimes, but that if they gain all three houses, they can implement any laws and with a disarmed populace, the populace can only complain, not truly rise up against the government...…..and then, it's welcome to Communism....and China and North Korea rejoice.
4. Tabling Kate's law is just the left's goal of getting in as many leftist migrants as possible and keeping them here for votes, even the criminal votes. It's all about the numbers. He/she who gets the most votes wins and those migrants being promised everything under the sun by the left, are potential voters. It still boils down to creating a leftist government that can't change. A one-party government, to govern all the people, in all aspects of their lives. Then of course, there still remains the George Soros puppets that believe in the Free Movement of Peoples with no national borders.
5. Last. Well, they believe that by allowing chaos to reign, it will somehow make the Orange Man look bad. If he steps in with federal troops across the nation, they will scream that he is being a tyrant and that they'll never get him out of office, no matter the elections. They'll also go after him for using Unconstitutional tactics interfering with what is a state's rights issue. Ultimately, it is again, a matter of dividing the nation. A classic ploy of Communism. Divide and conquer.
Solution? I think that we were wrong to stop listening to those that warned us against Communism in the past...Sometimes, being the good guy comes back and bites you in the ass. What do we do about it now, "after the horse has left the barn?" as they say. My solution would be a violation of the very Constitution we hold dear. Suspend the Constitution, seek out all Marxist/Leninists and forcibly drive them out of the country at the end of a bayonet. Stuff them on planes and ships and send them to their utopias and if China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba and Venezuela say they don't want them....sink the ships and shoot down the planes, for we sure as hell don't need them back here. Oh, and toss George Soros in the mix for the hell of it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Anyway, the left and far left know that by disarming the American populace, you won't stop criminals from committing crimes, but that if they gain all three houses, they can implement any laws and with a disarmed populace, the populace can only complain, not truly rise up against the government...…..and then, it's welcome to Communism....and China and North Korea rejoice.

I don't know if it goes that far. I think it boils down to more government dependency.

If they could somehow make guns illegal, or too impractical to own, then only the police and criminals would have the guns. We would be helpless, and crime would skyrocket which is what the Democrats want. So how do you fight big crime? The same way you fight Big Pharma, Big tobacco, Big oil, and that is with a bigger government.

More cops, more courts, more lawyers who contribute heavily to the Democrat party, more judges, more bailiffs, more government. Who do government employees generally vote for???

Fact check: Democrat's bill would increase taxes on firearms and ammunition

We rate as true a Facebook post's primary claim about taxes a Democratic bill would impose on firearms and ammunition.

www.usatoday.com

Solution? I think that we were wrong to stop listening to those that warned us against Communism in the past...Sometimes, being the good guy comes back and bites you in the ass. What do we do about it now, "after the horse has left the barn?" as they say.

We didn't stop listening to the warnings on Communism--they did. The devil doesn't appear to you in a fiery red cape, with a pitchfork, red from head to toe. He approaches you as a well dressed, meek and mild human being. The Communists said decades ago, they will takeover the United States, but do so without one bullet being fired. They will takeover from within. What the left doesn't realize is that they are carrying out their plan. If you look at the platform of the US Communist party, you'd be hell pressed to find the differences between their agendas and the Democrat party. While Jesus once said "forgive them Lord, they no not what they do" we have too much on the line to follow those words of Jesus.

 

[LuckyDuck]

Jeez! A religious zealot. Religion, the bane of humanity.

 

[j-mac]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

Yet we began our conversation here with you stating this in post #52...

Candycorn: " He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike."

No...the "all you guys think alike" started in post #1. I just put the shoe on the other foot.

No, it didn't....A question was posed, and instead of addressing the topic, you decided to troll with what you thought the OP was saying instead of what was actually posed....It's a dodge what you are doing here.

 

[candycorn]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

Yet we began our conversation here with you stating this in post #52...

Candycorn: " He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike."

No...the "all you guys think alike" started in post #1. I just put the shoe on the other foot.

No, it didn't....A question was posed, and instead of addressing the topic, you decided to troll with what you thought the OP was saying instead of what was actually posed....It's a dodge what you are doing here.

Sure it did. It said "democrats" not "some democrats". So I asked why all conservatives think the cop is a hero. Clearly since one conservative thinks it, all must; right?

 

[j-mac]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

The difference is that "most" conservatives agree with Democrats on the cop kneeling on Floyd's neck. You found one outlier. It's a much different contrast when "most" Democrats agree on something you might not agree with. That makes you the outlier.

And seven of your fellow blob supporters who thanked him for his post (not counting the ones who "loved" it)
The fallout afterword has been much more instructive...still hoping the nation splits in two are you?

I think the nation splitting into two countries is our only solution to our ongoing differences. Wouldn't you be happier without us conservatives as well? And if not--why not? I know I'd be much happier living with people of my own political persuasion.

If politics is that big a part of your life, you've got MUCH bigger problems than who your neighbor is. You need mental help. Now.

But lets see just how crazy you are...

How does the split you envision take place geographically? Is Wisconsin part of Conservistan based on the 2016 election?

My idea is that we split the country form north to south, giving equal land mass to both sides. I would suggest that the leftists take the west side of the country, since their beloved Mexican and southern American immigrants can take advantage of their open border policies.

We would keep the east side of the country. If Democrats and liberals had to move out, my property values would double or triple overnight. The downfall to that is we would have to layoff a good number of police officers. Our home alarm companies would suffer as well. Because of lack of occupation, we would also have to layoff jailers and prison guards, perhaps even close many of our prisons. But like you, we will have to deal with those problems as well.

On your side of the country, you can tax businesses and rich people to no ends. Of course they would quickly move to our side of the country, but that's something you'd have to deal with. Between immigrants, welfare people, free college, repartitions for black people, your side would collapse in a matter of a few years. That's why we will build a huge Trump wall to keep you out when that happens.

What people on your side want is a place where nobody has money except the government. All jobs pay equal regardless of what occupation one has. Nobody has firearms except the government. Free healthcare, and working is optional. Free food is included.

We already have places like this in our country. We call them prisons, and they are mostly populated with other Democrats. It's not hard to get into them either.

Would the "conservative" side of the land mass be based on delusions like the ones you just wrote?

What's delusional about it? Everything I wrote would come true.

Conservistan would fold very quickly for one thing. Hate is divisive. You are proving it with this folly. And hate is the national currency of Conservistan.

Projection at it text book finest!

 

[j-mac]

I vowed not to create new topics because a certain moderator takes them down in spite of following all the guidelines, and USMB doesn't seem interested to address the problem, but I have to ask people why they would vote Democrat? In light of recent events, it's clear that Democrats want a lawless society. Let's look at their stance when it comes to the protection of American citizens:

* The elimination of ICE, an agency that protects our borders and handles those who illegally enter our country.
* Cuts in military budgets, that weaken our military forces against aggressive nations.
* Disarm law abiding citizens, so we virtually have no real defense against the criminal element.
* Tabeling Kates Law, which would have given a stronger deterrent to deported felons who re-entered our country.
* And finally, Democrat Governors and Mayors, who want to defund their police force thus making them much less effective.

So why would anybody in their right mind vote for a candidate or party that takes these positions? Why in the world would you want to see a defenseless America? It truly baffles the mind. I don't care how much anybody hates President Trump. Imagine a country if the Democrats had their way.

Why do conservatives consider the cop who knelt on Floyd's neck a hero?

And what conservatives consider this cop a hero? Please give us examples, or take back your lying shit....I have seen NO ONE that considers this cop anything but a murderer....

Here ya go.

He called him a hero twice. The original instance of hero worship got multiple likes from fellow blob supporters.

View attachment 347080

Are you going to call him out on it or not?

I don't know who quarentine is, and Ray from Cleveland nowhere in the post you cite did he say that Chauvin was a "hero".... As for quarentine, I certainly don't agree that Chauvin was a hero....

He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike. What’s that.... you all don’t think alike? Strange...that is what Ray was saying about liberals and Democrats.


So when are you going to call out Quarantine on this? I’m guessing never right?


S

I look at people as individuals, even misguided ones....

Great so that means Ray is wrong.

Sorry it took so long to reply, but sounds like Ray commenting on liberal group think got under your skin a bit....In any case, as I said, I try to look at people as individuals, and as such we aren't going to agree with everyone all the time...This is part of the problem with today's narrative driven protestors....They won't accept that people can disagree with them...They demand total feality, and that is just authoritarian..

When we loose the freedom to think differently, we loose.

Under my skin? No. I was simply pointing out what you stated; people can agree on what party to belong to or what ideology to adopt and not agree with everyone who shares the party membership or ideology. Since one Conservative thinks the killer cop was a hero (quarantine) that doesn’t mean all cons do anymore than all democrats agreeing with every other Democrat on all topics.

Yet we began our conversation here with you stating this in post #52...

Candycorn: " He’s a fellow conservative. All you guys think alike."

No...the "all you guys think alike" started in post #1. I just put the shoe on the other foot.

No, it didn't....A question was posed, and instead of addressing the topic, you decided to troll with what you thought the OP was saying instead of what was actually posed....It's a dodge what you are doing here.

Sure it did. It said "democrats" not "some democrats". So I asked why all conservatives think the cop is a hero. Clearly since one conservative thinks it, all must; right?

So, childish trolling then....Thanks for admitting that.