Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That’s silly. They will be no immediately loss their license. They can be brought up on contempt of court charges and may suffer punitive measures at a later time, by the court. Loss of license is just one of the measures. You obviously aren’t a lawyer. You don’t know the difference between “will” and “can”.They can't lie in court. They will lose their law license. Don't you know the difference between Congress and a Court of law?
Nope...they can lie on behalf of their client. Geese’s, they all did just to partition to get a hearing.If they lie in court they lose their law license
Seriously. You’re totally out of context. Guess you never watched the OJ trial. Tell us how thelawyers for OJ never lied.Lawyers are officers of the court. They can't lie.
Do you have a clue ?Do you have a JD?
Same thing with the previous filing. No mention of declassification.
They can but they'll lose their license to practice lawNope...they can lie on behalf of their client.
Nope….They can but they'll lose their license to practice law
His lawyers are arguing on his behalf in court. It’s not Trump who is doing the argument. Lawyers are free to make false arguments on behalf of their clients. What they aren’t going to do, is submit false evidence or directly confront a judge with a lie.It's a lie. Trump can claim all day long that he can telepathiclly declassify documents, but his lawyers won't go there.
Sigh...what we have been sayingHis lawyers are arguing on his behalf in court. It’s not Trump who is doing the argument. Lawyers are free to make false arguments on behalf of their clients. What they aren’t going to do, is submit false evidence or directly confront a judge with a lie.
Got a plea bargain. 5 years disbarred, er I mean suspended, disbarred from practicing before SCOTUS but resignedNo, he wasn't.
Wrong, they hear evidence and make decisions on a variety of issues.FISA isn't a court of law.
Sample…“If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”Sigh...what we have been saying
Not really.Sigh...what we have been saying
If the glove doesn’t fit, you must acquit.They can but they'll lose their license to practice law
Well, every court case that has been brought forth so far which alleges that the election was stolen has been thrown out for lack of evidence. If you have some kind of proof that the election actually was stolen, other than what you have heard from people who just have feelings but no proof, you'd become famous overnight. So..............where is your proof that the election was stolen?
He wasn’t president when he absconded with them.
If you read the inventory of recovered docs there was top secret and SCI national Defense docs… and much more
Bullshit, Trump had those docs for a year and a half after he left the WH...so fuck YOURSELFAnd if you read a recent newspaper you know that Trump was still President. Go fuck yourself. Your hypocrisy just stenches
How is the SM the Trump team wanted supposed to rule on those docs without knowing their status?Has He been indicted?
NO
Why should thy have to testify before any formal charges have been made?
Go's to a possible future defense..
