The trout is now declaring himself the winner. LOL.
Maybe we should quote your Dear Leader about why America needed to bomb Libya some more.
You people bombed Libya over oil, fact suck it!
My people are Americans.
If you want to believe that Americans bombed Libya over oil- well you trout can believe anything you want.
But your Dear Leader said it was for humanitarian reasons- just like President Obama did.
Hillary said we bombed Libya for oil idiot, go argue with her she was SOS.
Yet you haven't provided a single quote from Clinton actually saying that.
It is almost like you just want to be challenged on that lie.
You are one dumb liberal, here's one example from the first google hit you tard.
Libya: In 2011, Clinton was a strong
proponent of regime change in Libya (as was
Trump). It is forgotten today that a primary justification she offered for the U.S. military role in Libya was to pay back allies for Afghanistan. As she
stated in late March 2011: “
We asked our allies, our NATO allies, to go into Afghanistan with us 10 years ago. They have been there, and a lot of them have been there despite the fact they were not attacked.… When it comes to Libya, we started hearing from the U.K., France, Italy, other of our NATO allies. This was in their vital national interest.”
LOL- I love it when you contard idiots quote something that actually shows you were lying!
Here was your claim:
Hillary said we bombed Libya for oil idiot
The CFR article you cite- is a good article- and it refutes your lie. Doesn't mention oil at all.
Libya: "Justifications" for Intervention
So the CFR article cites 6 reasons for the American involvement in the intervention in Libya
The stated U.N. reason- to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack.
And these additional reasons
1) Regime change
2) Sending a Message to Other Dictators
3) Supporting Libyan Rebels
4) Repaying European Support in Afghanistan
5) It will be a piece of cake
Of those- only #4 is noted as being one of the reasons supported by Clinton
“We asked our allies, our NATO allies, to go into Afghanistan with us ten years ago. They have been there and a lot of them have been there despite the fact they were not attacked… They stuck with us. When it comes to Libya, we started hearing from the U.K., France, Italy, other of our NATO allies. This was in their vital national interests.”
Or as Marco Rubio put it
“American disengagement would also inflict irreparable damage on the NATO alliance…Having walked out on our European allies in the middle of a battle, we can expect them to do the same to us in Afghanistan.”
No mention of oil anywhere in the article.
Troutboy lying again.