I'm looking at it failing based on what trump promised. He said they would pay for themselves and increase gdp growth to 4-6%. I'm not following how you are saying it wasn't a failure? The opposite happened of what was claimed. I'm pretty confident without them the economy would be pretty much the same, but deficits would be much smaller. It seems to have been just a huge handout to the rich.
Oh, the Trumpsters don't give two shits about that. He's gone hyper-Keynesian, something they would have attacked with both barrels just four years ago, and they don't care.
All they know is what they are provided in their little universe. What I said above will not enter that universe.
.
I was expecting there to be noticeable growth myself so I’m really curious how such a big cut delivered just a temporary bump. I think it has to do with so many Corps having near monopolies...
Well, I've been studying this crap pretty carefully, and my guess (at this moment) is that the middle and lower middle classes STILL don't have enough disposable income, even with the wage growth. On top of that, both individual and corporate debt are WAY up there, meaning we've burned through our cash.
This, after pouring every stimulative idea we have at the economy, fiscal responsibility be damned in favor of partisan politics.
2.1% growth, and no inflation,
after Trump's All You Can Eat Fiscal Donut Truck? Something isn't right. I dunno.
.