Why did the blog fail?


No re-tweets, no likes, no loving replies from the cult members.

The blog failed to stroke his enormous ego, so Trump killed it.

Good riddance!
Serious answer here, from Trump's biggest fan (me)....

It just goes to show that censorship stinks. Very few are interested in only hearing the "official word," with no chance to comment or even express one's opinion via thumbs up or thumbs down votes.

It's why most of us are here at USMB, probably. We get to hear a variety of opinions, and optionally interact with the posted opinions if we choose to do so.

Blogs without a comment option fare similarly.

Perhaps he had hoped that people would copy and paste his posts to Twitter and Facebook, in a type of free-speech rebellion against the Big Tech heavy-handed censorship. Unfortunately free speech is so censored these days, that even reposting Donald Trump's words is banned these days...


And of course there are the page views, which were undoubtedly monitored closely.

Free speech is dead in America. Self-appointed micro-dosing CEOs are more powerful than the president of the United States. They censor truth, and mark it as false (e.g. Wuhan). And you Leftists think it is funny, because you don't care what the truth is, only that your Socialist agenda gets propelled, even if it sacrifices fundamental American values. It is cause for great alarm.

censorship01.jpg
No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.
>No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.

That's a twisted way of thinking. The Florida bill prevents the companies from inappropriately restricting the free speech of the users that use their platforms.

  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize candidates for state office.
  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize any news outlet meeting certain size requirements.
  • Platforms must be transparent about moderation processes and give users notice of moderation actions.
  • Users and the state will have the right to sue companies that violate the law. Statutory fines could be as high as $250,000 per day for some offenses.
I suppose the SCOTUS will decide in the end, but the bill obviously promotes the free speech rights of the citizens at the expense of limiting the power of some giant companies which have arguably been abusing their power to restrict the free expression of citizens for political and financial gain.

It's interesting how Leftists normally side against big companies ("tax the rich!"), but when it comes to censoring Conservatives, they side with "rights" of the corporations on 1A grounds, because the Corps are on their side.

The bill benefits millions of citizens. Aw, the poor corporations can't censor as much as they used to.

I really don't want Twitter, Google, and Facebook deciding our elections for us by picking and choosing the candidates which are allowed to have audiences on their platforms.

Regards,
Jim
I still want to see what happens if a candidate in FL starts mass-posting outright lies about Ron DeSantis and Facebook, Twitter do nothing about it, for fear of running afoul of this new dumbass law.
 

No re-tweets, no likes, no loving replies from the cult members.

The blog failed to stroke his enormous ego, so Trump killed it.

Good riddance!
Serious answer here, from Trump's biggest fan (me)....

It just goes to show that censorship stinks. Very few are interested in only hearing the "official word," with no chance to comment or even express one's opinion via thumbs up or thumbs down votes.

It's why most of us are here at USMB, probably. We get to hear a variety of opinions, and optionally interact with the posted opinions if we choose to do so.

Blogs without a comment option fare similarly.

Perhaps he had hoped that people would copy and paste his posts to Twitter and Facebook, in a type of free-speech rebellion against the Big Tech heavy-handed censorship. Unfortunately free speech is so censored these days, that even reposting Donald Trump's words is banned these days...


And of course there are the page views, which were undoubtedly monitored closely.

Free speech is dead in America. Self-appointed micro-dosing CEOs are more powerful than the president of the United States. They censor truth, and mark it as false (e.g. Wuhan). And you Leftists think it is funny, because you don't care what the truth is, only that your Socialist agenda gets propelled, even if it sacrifices fundamental American values. It is cause for great alarm.

censorship01.jpg
No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.
>No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.

That's a twisted way of thinking. The Florida bill prevents the companies from inappropriately restricting the free speech of the users that use their platforms.

  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize candidates for state office.
  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize any news outlet meeting certain size requirements.
  • Platforms must be transparent about moderation processes and give users notice of moderation actions.
  • Users and the state will have the right to sue companies that violate the law. Statutory fines could be as high as $250,000 per day for some offenses.
I suppose the SCOTUS will decide in the end, but the bill obviously promotes the free speech rights of the citizens at the expense of limiting the power of some giant companies which have arguably been abusing their power to restrict the free expression of citizens for political and financial gain.

It's interesting how Leftists normally side against big companies ("tax the rich!"), but when it comes to censoring Conservatives, they side with "rights" of the corporations on 1A grounds, because the Corps are on their side.

The bill benefits millions of citizens. Aw, the poor corporations can't censor as much as they used to.

I really don't want Twitter, Google, and Facebook deciding our elections for us by picking and choosing the candidates which are allowed to have audiences on their platforms.

Regards,
Jim
I still want to see what happens if a candidate in FL starts mass-posting outright lies about Ron DeSantis and Facebook, Twitter do nothing about it, for fear of running afoul of this new dumbass law.
>I still want to see what happens if a candidate in FL starts mass-posting outright lies about Ron DeSantis and Facebook, Twitter do nothing about it, for fear of running afoul of this new dumbass law.

The great thing is, nothing happens, hopefully. Except perhaps DeSantis choosing to reply.

Candidates lying is almost redundant, with few exceptions.
 

No re-tweets, no likes, no loving replies from the cult members.

The blog failed to stroke his enormous ego, so Trump killed it.

Good riddance!
Serious answer here, from Trump's biggest fan (me)....

It just goes to show that censorship stinks. Very few are interested in only hearing the "official word," with no chance to comment or even express one's opinion via thumbs up or thumbs down votes.

It's why most of us are here at USMB, probably. We get to hear a variety of opinions, and optionally interact with the posted opinions if we choose to do so.

Blogs without a comment option fare similarly.

Perhaps he had hoped that people would copy and paste his posts to Twitter and Facebook, in a type of free-speech rebellion against the Big Tech heavy-handed censorship. Unfortunately free speech is so censored these days, that even reposting Donald Trump's words is banned these days...


And of course there are the page views, which were undoubtedly monitored closely.

Free speech is dead in America. Self-appointed micro-dosing CEOs are more powerful than the president of the United States. They censor truth, and mark it as false (e.g. Wuhan). And you Leftists think it is funny, because you don't care what the truth is, only that your Socialist agenda gets propelled, even if it sacrifices fundamental American values. It is cause for great alarm.

censorship01.jpg
No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.
>No, free speech is not dead in America. Limiting free speech never applied private citizens or private corporations. It applies to the government. Ironically, it's Republicans who are trying to kill free speech as Florida passed a bill restricting free speech on private companies.

That's a twisted way of thinking. The Florida bill prevents the companies from inappropriately restricting the free speech of the users that use their platforms.

  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize candidates for state office.
  • Platforms cannot ban or deprioritize any news outlet meeting certain size requirements.
  • Platforms must be transparent about moderation processes and give users notice of moderation actions.
  • Users and the state will have the right to sue companies that violate the law. Statutory fines could be as high as $250,000 per day for some offenses.
I suppose the SCOTUS will decide in the end, but the bill obviously promotes the free speech rights of the citizens at the expense of limiting the power of some giant companies which have arguably been abusing their power to restrict the free expression of citizens for political and financial gain.

It's interesting how Leftists normally side against big companies ("tax the rich!"), but when it comes to censoring Conservatives, they side with "rights" of the corporations on 1A grounds, because the Corps are on their side.

The bill benefits millions of citizens. Aw, the poor corporations can't censor as much as they used to.

I really don't want Twitter, Google, and Facebook deciding our elections for us by picking and choosing the candidates which are allowed to have audiences on their platforms.

Regards,
Jim
I still want to see what happens if a candidate in FL starts mass-posting outright lies about Ron DeSantis and Facebook, Twitter do nothing about it, for fear of running afoul of this new dumbass law.
>I still want to see what happens if a candidate in FL starts mass-posting outright lies about Ron DeSantis and Facebook, Twitter do nothing about it, for fear of running afoul of this new dumbass law.

The great thing is, nothing happens, hopefully. Except perhaps DeSantis choosing to reply.

Candidates lying is almost redundant, with few exceptions.
social media would be unable to enforce their terms of service.
Which means you would have rampant porn, fake news, threats, anything goes.
 

No re-tweets, no likes, no loving replies from the cult members.

The blog failed to stroke his enormous ego, so Trump killed it.

Good riddance!
Serious answer here, from Trump's biggest fan (me)....

It just goes to show that censorship stinks. Very few are interested in only hearing the "official word," with no chance to comment or even express one's opinion via thumbs up or thumbs down votes.

It's why most of us are here at USMB, probably. We get to hear a variety of opinions, and optionally interact with the posted opinions if we choose to do so.

Blogs without a comment option fare similarly.

Perhaps he had hoped that people would copy and paste his posts to Twitter and Facebook, in a type of free-speech rebellion against the Big Tech heavy-handed censorship. Unfortunately free speech is so censored these days, that even reposting Donald Trump's words is banned these days...


And of course there are the page views, which were undoubtedly monitored closely.

Free speech is dead in America. Self-appointed micro-dosing CEOs are more powerful than the president of the United States. They censor truth, and mark it as false (e.g. Wuhan). And you Leftists think it is funny, because you don't care what the truth is, only that your Socialist agenda gets propelled, even if it sacrifices fundamental American values. It is cause for great alarm.

censorship01.jpg

Free speech does not mean you having access to the platform of a private corporation.

You are free to start your own platform.

Because America.
Then how come the cult is unhinged over your boy being banned from FB & Twitter?
 
Free speech does not mean you having access to the platform of a private corporation.

You are free to start your own platform.

Because America.

Yes, you are free to start your own platform. Because America.

Free speech does not mean you having access to the platform of a private corporation.

So true. :itsok: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :hyper:
 
No, it really doesn't. If you don't like a store that sells widgets, you can start your own widget store. It's not the other stores fault if their widgets remain more popular than yours.

Yep, you are so correct! If you don't like a store that sells widgets, you can start your own widget store. It's not the other stores fault if their widgets remain more popular than yours. :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :hyper: :itsok:
 
What are you talking about?

You have every right to go out and start a competitor to Twitter or Facebook.

As for "conservatives" whining about "the truth," stop pushing The Big Lie and then the rest of the country might take you seriously.

Yes, You have every right to go out and start a competitor to Twitter or Facebook. :itsok: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :hyper:
 

Forum List

Back
Top