Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,412
- 2,180
Oh no, now a civil case
Why a Lawsuit Could Hurt Clinton More Than the FBI Probe
Why a Civil Case Over Emails Could Hurt Hillary Clinton More Than the FBI
May 17, 2016
Two top aides will testify
Every year for more than two decades, the conservative watchdog groupJudicial Watch has filed scores of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for documents from the federal government, many in pursuit of a favorite target: Bill and Hillary Clinton. Now, with FOIA case No. F-2013-08812, they may finally have hit the political jackpot.
Two close Clinton aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, will testify under oath this month and next Judicial Watchannounced today. The judge in the casesaid earlier this month he may force Clinton herself to testify after the first round of interviews is completed. That has set up the prospect of the Democratic front-runner for the White House facing off under oath against one of her most dogged pursuers as early as July, just months before the November election.
Clinton may have violated civil law if she intentionally thwarted FOIA or the Federal Records Act, which requires public officials to take a number of steps to preserve and make public their work related documents, according to experts and judges handling the matter in the courts. Which means that for many voters it will be Clinton’s trustworthiness that is on trial in the FOIA case.
.
.
Why a Lawsuit Could Hurt Clinton More Than the FBI Probe
Why a Civil Case Over Emails Could Hurt Hillary Clinton More Than the FBI
May 17, 2016
Two top aides will testify
Every year for more than two decades, the conservative watchdog groupJudicial Watch has filed scores of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for documents from the federal government, many in pursuit of a favorite target: Bill and Hillary Clinton. Now, with FOIA case No. F-2013-08812, they may finally have hit the political jackpot.
Two close Clinton aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, will testify under oath this month and next Judicial Watchannounced today. The judge in the casesaid earlier this month he may force Clinton herself to testify after the first round of interviews is completed. That has set up the prospect of the Democratic front-runner for the White House facing off under oath against one of her most dogged pursuers as early as July, just months before the November election.
Clinton may have violated civil law if she intentionally thwarted FOIA or the Federal Records Act, which requires public officials to take a number of steps to preserve and make public their work related documents, according to experts and judges handling the matter in the courts. Which means that for many voters it will be Clinton’s trustworthiness that is on trial in the FOIA case.
.
.