Why cant the AGW contingent make their case??

[Crick]

Let's see, natural gas up 2%
Liquid biofuels (I don't even know what that is), up 3%
Nuclear, up 1%
Coal, down 1%
Petroleum, down 4%

So in order of percent growth we get:

Liquid biofuels
Natural gas
Nuclear
Coal
Petroleum.

So, the two primary fossil fuels, painted in the rosiest possible light, come in dead last.


Got it.

 

[skookerasbil]

Let's see, natural gas up 2%
Liquid biofuels (I don't even know what that is), up 3%
Nuclear, up 1%
Coal, down 1%
Petroleum, down 4%

So in order of percent growth we get:

Liquid biofuels
Natural gas
Nuclear
Coal
Petroleum.

So, the two primary fossil fuels, painted in the rosiest possible light, come in dead last.


Got it.

Indeed.

Except non-k00ks read the EIA graph like this.........

They see mega amounts of blue, brown and pink......decades from now.

Green?

Not so much!!!

 

[jc456]

Skook, spamming the same crap across multiple threads violates board rules. You know that, but keep doing it.

Skook here believes himself to be a special little snowflake that the rules don't apply to. He's an example of the self-esteem cult run amok, the kid who cried if he didn't get a participation trophy.

talk about the pot calling the kettle out! you remain a k00k!

 

[Wyld Kard]

We have made our case. You've just ignored it and lied about it. Hence, nobody wastes time on you.

But congratulations on making yourselves into completely irrelevant jokes. I know you worked hard at it, so you deserve credit. Meanwhile, the world is just ignoring you. Was that also part of your plan?

We have made our case.

Yeah, sure they have.

 

[Wyld Kard]

Why can't the AGW contingent make their case??

Because not everybody drinks their Kool-Aid.

 

[Crick]

Yeah, sure they have.

Read AR5 and tells us a case has not been made.

And where is YOUR case?

Let me guess: it's spread all over the internet: on a thousand blogs. Your heroes stay away from peer review and mainstream journals cause... well... cause they can't get diddly squat published. But that's because there's a huge conspiracy to suppress the truth. Right? Climate scientists are all getting rich on research grants by falsifying their results; by lying about what their data actually tells us. Right? And they're ALL in on it. Right? With the liberals in government. Right? A conspiracy to destroy the American economy because liberals are actually all Soviet communists who want to destroy America and give it to their despotic overlords in Moscow. Right? Right?

God what ******* idiots you are.

 

[Wyld Kard]

Yeah, sure they have.

Read AR5 and tells us a case has not been made.

And where is YOUR case?

Let me guess: it's spread all over the internet: on a thousand blogs. Your heroes stay away from peer review and mainstream journals cause... well... cause they can't get diddly squat published. But that's because there's a huge conspiracy to suppress the truth. Right? Climate scientists are all getting rich on research grants by falsifying their results; by lying about what their data actually tells us. Right? And they're ALL in on it. Right? With the liberals in government. Right? A conspiracy to destroy the American economy because liberals are actually all Soviet communists who want to destroy America and give it to their despotic overlords in Moscow. Right? Right?

God what ******* idiots you are.

AR5 is chaulked full of bullshit!

The 2013 IPCC AR5 Report Facts -vs- Fictions Watts Up With That

God what ******* idiots you are.

Says the one who drank the Kool-Aid and bought into the lies.

Try again dumbass.

 

[Old Rocks]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

 

[Wyld Kard]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

All the so-called evidence that YOU or Crick or Cultsmasher has ever posted with regards to global warming / climate change claiming that it is real, and that it's man-made, and that it is a threat, is equal to a big steaming pile of shit.


You are somewhat stupid and gullible Goldierocks. Must be the Kool-Aid.

 

[mamooth]

The WUWT trolls keep getting more shrill.

You kind of pity them. It's all falling apart for their cult, and they're not handling it well. They used to try to pretend they weren't just doing a direct cut-and-paste from WUWT, but they won't even make that much effort now.

 

[Billy_Bob]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

The elitist scumbag answer... The ones who think only they are so smart and others who may not have degree's but have the smarts are stupid..... Ignorance!

I know morons who hold PHD's and I know people who have not finished the 10th grade who can stomp them in the dirt in not only math but understanding and identifying processes. Your elitist drivel is just crap..

 

[Billy_Bob]

The WUWT trolls keep getting more shrill.

You kind of pity them. It's all falling apart for their cult, and they're not handling it well. They used to try to pretend they weren't just doing a direct cut-and-paste from WUWT, but they won't even make that much effort now.

Are you incapable of debating the facts??... adhom and character assassinations, never a single time will you approach facts.... The mark of an alarmist drone that can not think because it lacks functioning brain cells..

 

[mamooth]

The tears of a WUWT cult troll having a meltdown are like a fine wine. Cry for us more, Billy, cry for us more. Yes, that's it, squeal like a little girl. Push out even more tears. Mmmmmm, tasty.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The tears of a WUWT cult troll having a meltdown are like a fine wine. Cry for us more, Billy, cry for us more. Yes, that's it, squeal like a little girl. Push out even more tears. Mmmmmm, tasty.

WOW, such a fast response. Did your handlers tell you what to think and write? Or is this your idea of a fact filled post?

You did answer my question even though not directly, You are a moron without a brain and incapable of any cognitive thought. No reason to even acknowledge you further except to point out your lies..

 

[mamooth]

<Mmmmm .... more, Billy, more.>

Oh, I saw how you cratered at Sou's as well. That was hilarious. I saw no need to jump in, given the thoroughness of your humiliation.

<That's it. Let it flow. Here, help me fill this bottle for later. Such sweet, sweet nectar.>

There is a point to this. You cling to your cult because of the emotional gratification it brings you. If your cult affiliation were to bring you only humiliation instead of joy, you'd leave the cult. So we're supplying the humiliation. It's for your own good, some tough love for the deniers.

 

[westwall]

<Mmmmm .... more, Billy, more.>

Oh, I saw how you cratered at Sou's as well. That was hilarious. I saw no need to jump in, given the thoroughness of your humiliation.

<That's it. Let it flow. Here, help me fill this bottle for later. Such sweet, sweet nectar.>

There is a point to this. You cling to your cult because of the emotional gratification it brings you. If your cult affiliation were to bring you only humiliation instead of joy, you'd leave the cult. So we're supplying the humiliation. It's for your own good, some tough love for the deniers.

If skepticism were a cult like the abject belief in CAGW then carbon trading desks all over the world would be remaining open But, seeing's how they are closing, it appears it is you who are the cultist.

 

[bripat9643]

Do you understand how bad your science and logic is? Rest assured that we understand how bad it is. That's why the world is ignoring you. It's not a socialist conspiracy; you're just really bad at this..

You've been snookered by professional con artists, who found you to be easy pickings due to your inability to recognize obvious bullshit. At this point, you have to decide whether to turn on the scammers who bamboozled you, or to rage against me, the messenger. Sadly, I already know which course you'll take.

When various doomsday cults predicted the end of the world and the end didn't come, many true believers got even more devoted to the cult. Deniers are the same way. It's human nature to not want to admit you were fooled badly.

 

[Crick]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

The elitist scumbag answer... The ones who think only they are so smart and others who may not have degree's but have the smarts are stupid..... Ignorance!

I know morons who hold PHD's and I know people who have not finished the 10th grade who can stomp them in the dirt in not only math but understanding and identifying processes. Your elitist drivel is just crap..

You missed the point completely Billy Boy. It's not that we are so much smarter than you (though this sort of misinterpretation on your part does lend credence to the idea) but that our experts - the world's actively researching PhD climate scientists - are so much smarter and knowledgeable and ethical than yours: Anthony Watts, Roy Spencer, Bob Tisdale, Christopher Monckton, James Taylor, John Coleman, etc, etc, etc.

BTW, what percentage of people who haven't finished the 10th grade do you believe can "stomp" PhDs "in the dirt" on technical topics? Do you really think most dropouts are smarter than most PhDs Billy? I think you do. Your posts would tend to support the idea that that's what you believe. How supportable do you think such an idea would turn out in the final contest Billy Bob? Where would such a misconception arise if not from your personal antipathy towards the educated? And where would such antipathy arise if not from your own personal failures at education? You didn't make it through school, did you. And that fact has made you a lifelong loser, hasn't it. What do you do for a living Billy Bob? Solid Waste Disposal? Roadside Excavator? Handy Man?

Got it.

 

[SSDD]

We give you scientists publications in peer reviewed scientific journals. You give us the spewing of an un-degreed ex-TV weatherman, and expect us to give equal weight to that. You are somewhat retarded Wildcard.

The elitist scumbag answer... The ones who think only they are so smart and others who may not have degree's but have the smarts are stupid..... Ignorance!

I know morons who hold PHD's and I know people who have not finished the 10th grade who can stomp them in the dirt in not only math but understanding and identifying processes. Your elitist drivel is just crap..

You missed the point completely Billy Boy. It's not that we are so much smarter than you (though this sort of misinterpretation on your part does lend credence to the idea) but that our experts - the world's actively researching PhD climate scientists - are so much smarter and knowledgeable and ethical than yours: Anthony Watts, Roy Spencer, Bob Tisdale, Christopher Monckton, James Taylor, John Coleman, etc, etc, etc.

BTW, what percentage of people who haven't finished the 10th grade do you believe can "stomp" PhDs "in the dirt" on technical topics? Do you really think most dropouts are smarter than most PhDs Billy? I think you do. Your posts would tend to support the idea that that's what you believe. How supportable do you think such an idea would turn out in the final contest Billy Bob? Where would such a misconception arise if not from your personal antipathy towards the educated? And where would such antipathy arise if not from your own personal failures at education? You didn't make it through school, did you. And that fact has made you a lifelong loser, hasn't it. What do you do for a living Billy Bob? Solid Waste Disposal? Roadside Excavator? Handy Man?

Got it.

Really? Which side of the argument spends millions keeping data hidden from the public? Common sense tells you that the side that is hiding data is the side that is not so ethical...or honest....or smart.

 

[Crick]

Who has spent what millions hiding what data?

Have you not actually woken up yet? Are you typing out your dreams?