Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,830
- 1,790
I sure hope we as Western culture and society can quelch this onslaught before we are endangered to the point of no return.
I think we need to engage, while we can return.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I sure hope we as Western culture and society can quelch this onslaught before we are endangered to the point of no return.
Which is exactly why businesses and jobs are fleeing California.
Explain.
The GOP could start by taking some of the worst Damnocrats up on charges of treason. The American people need to know who the real enemy is.It really doesn't matter if we are speaking of terrorists, borders, or domestic issues. If we continue the policies that have been in place, allowing the opposition both at home and abroad to define them, we will find that the hole we dug is too deep.
The GOP could start by taking some of the worst Damnocrats up on charges of treason. The American people need to know who the real enemy is.
Agreed. There should be a committee to identify the worst of both parties and run them through the wringer. We need a Joe McCarthy.
Never liked him. We need a guy with a axe to grind.
He had some good aspects. But when the Democrats turned hard Left with Clinton, he became somewhat marginalized, as he was an old school Liberal: honest, a do-gooder with no lust for power. He became obsolete under the Clinton theme of power for power's sake, stab and kill your way to the top.I liked him a lot. Was the first to explain why welfare had caused black families to collapse.
He had some good aspects. But when the Democrats turned hard Left with Clinton, he became somewhat marginalized, as he was an old school Liberal: honest, a do-gooder with no lust for power. He became obsolete under the Clinton theme of power for power's sake, stab and kill your way to the top.
I just listed the good atributes. Above all, he was a Liberal elitist, out of touch with reality (IMO) and completely wrong on most issues. I'm just saying he wasn't a lying, back stabbing murderess like I believe Hillary Clinton is, or the lying, evil person that Schumer is.And that makes him bad? How? In my perspective, goes to prove...
I just listed the good atributes. Above all, he was a Liberal elitist, out of touch with reality (IMO) and completely wrong on most issues. I'm just saying he wasn't a lying, back stabbing murderess like I believe Hillary Clinton is, or the lying, evil person that Schumer is.
I lived in NY for 11 years while he was Senator, and was a Town Chairman of the Conservative Party. I read enough of his stuff to know what he stood for. But at least he was honest about it.
Mainly:Good for you, what is it that you found offensive and too liberal? Yes he was honest.
Mainly:
1. As the so-called expert on welfare for decades, Moynihan funneled literally trillions of dollars on a “war on poverty”, and thereby created a permanent underclass. He voted against welfare reform in 1996.
2. He had constant, undying support for failed public schools and labor unions, and fought against free market solutions.
3. He voted against ClintonÂ’s impeachment.
#3, so did nearly every GOP member.
Who's against public schools? He was for looking at alternatives, when he was in Senate.
He was against Clinton's program of implementation and you wish to tar him? LOL