ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #1
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, dumbass, you don't want to know. It's been explained many times on this board - complete with charts and graphs.
No, dumbass, you don't want to know. It's been explained many times on this board - complete with charts and graphs.
Did your people have charts and graphs a thousand years ago?
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
They were sold to the public as a means to create jobs which they have not. They added trillions to the deficit.
Compare it to a person in debt who takes a pay cut in order to do better.
Its not that the Bush tax cuts are bad. Its the theory of supply side economic that these tax cuts adhere to.
In theory tax cuts allow more money to accumulate in peoples hands. These monies are supposed to allow a "trickle down" effect as to where wealth moves from those who have it to people who work for a living.
this theory has not panned out at all, never have, never will. If it did, Bush's last term and Obama's first term would have seen some job growth. We all know, this never happened.
You can find numbers backing these facts up if you like.
Keep in mind, after Reagen used similar tax cuts he had to raise taxes to offset the growing debt. Clinton also raised taxes and we know what sort of growth we had under Clinton
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
Its not that the Bush tax cuts are bad. Its the theory of supply side economic that these tax cuts adhere to.
In theory tax cuts allow more money to accumulate in peoples hands. These monies are supposed to allow a "trickle down" effect as to where wealth moves from those who have it to people who work for a living.
this theory has not panned out at all, never have, never will. If it did, Bush's last term and Obama's first term would have seen some job growth. We all know, this never happened.
You can find numbers backing these facts up if you like.
Keep in mind, after Reagen used similar tax cuts he had to raise taxes to offset the growing debt. Clinton also raised taxes and we know what sort of growth we had under Clinton
Exactly why Americans need to think twice when casting their vote in November. Romney has not furthered himself from similar Bush polices at all, or not yet anyways.
Amnesia seems to have struck many on the right however, I trust smart, educated Americans will remember the last time the GOP was in charge, and it sucked donkey balls.
Is a payroll tax cut ''trickle down, voodoo economics, supply side economics''? hmmmmm, that's news to me....Its not that the Bush tax cuts are bad. Its the theory of supply side economic that these tax cuts adhere to.
In theory tax cuts allow more money to accumulate in peoples hands. These monies are supposed to allow a "trickle down" effect as to where wealth moves from those who have it to people who work for a living.
this theory has not panned out at all, never have, never will. If it did, Bush's last term and Obama's first term would have seen some job growth. We all know, this never happened.
You can find numbers backing these facts up if you like.
Keep in mind, after Reagen used similar tax cuts he had to raise taxes to offset the growing debt. Clinton also raised taxes and we know what sort of growth we had under Clinton
No, idiot. You clearly do not understand what "supply side" means.
If it were as yo say, then why has Obama pushed the payroll tax reduction all this time, despite it being an obvious failure?
Bush's tax cuts were a policy success. They were enacted in the year or two after 9/11 and restored the economy. Obama's tax policy is a gross failure, ushering in the weakest economic performance on record.
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
Is a payroll tax cut ''trickle down, voodoo economics, supply side economics''? hmmmmm, that's news to me....Its not that the Bush tax cuts are bad. Its the theory of supply side economic that these tax cuts adhere to.
In theory tax cuts allow more money to accumulate in peoples hands. These monies are supposed to allow a "trickle down" effect as to where wealth moves from those who have it to people who work for a living.
this theory has not panned out at all, never have, never will. If it did, Bush's last term and Obama's first term would have seen some job growth. We all know, this never happened.
You can find numbers backing these facts up if you like.
Keep in mind, after Reagen used similar tax cuts he had to raise taxes to offset the growing debt. Clinton also raised taxes and we know what sort of growth we had under Clinton
No, idiot. You clearly do not understand what "supply side" means.
If it were as yo say, then why has Obama pushed the payroll tax reduction all this time, despite it being an obvious failure?
Bush's tax cuts were a policy success. They were enacted in the year or two after 9/11 and restored the economy. Obama's tax policy is a gross failure, ushering in the weakest economic performance on record.
so you think the Bush tax cuts 'restored' the economy and the fake housing BUBBLE had nothing to do with the economy doing well....until of course...it Burst?
Can you explain to me why the Bush tax cuts are bad? I wish to try to understand this. I thought they focused on the middle income and upwards.
Thanks.
They were sold to the public as a means to create jobs which they have not. They added trillions to the deficit.
I hate to differ sir the salespeople have jobs should this not count as job creation