Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu?

[Kosh]

The world is leaving them behind?

Hmmm

WH
Senate
House
1, possibly 3 seats on SCOTUS?

Yeah, they're really back there in the dust

Thanks to 4 swing states. Otherwise, the rest of Americans voted against the reich wing.

4 swing states?

The 'rest' of America?

How many states did Hillary get?

15?
20?

and Trump got the REST

lol, hilarious that you think you have some sort of mandate. Hillary is STILL pummeling Trump in the popular vote, leading by 1.3 million last time I checked, and your white trash fascist barely squeaked in thanks to just barely winning 4 key swing states and the archaic, outdated electoral college.

Once again the far left can still not accept the fact that they lost and lost big!

 

[Harry Dresden]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

They're a fucking broken record. Same shit, over and over and over....they never evolve. They hate that the world is leaving them behind, so they cling to the only things they know.

a fucking broken record. Same shit, over and over and over
you are beginning to catch on about deans threads....

 

[Auld Phart]

The world is leaving them behind?

Hmmm

WH
Senate
House
1, possibly 3 seats on SCOTUS?

Yeah, they're really back there in the dust

Thanks to 4 swing states. Otherwise, the rest of Americans voted against the reich wing.

4 swing states?

The 'rest' of America?

How many states did Hillary get?

15?
20?

and Trump got the REST

lol, hilarious that you think you have some sort of mandate. Hillary is STILL pummeling Trump in the popular vote, leading by 1.3 million last time I checked, and your white trash fascist barely squeaked in thanks to just barely winning 4 key swing states and the archaic, outdated electoral college.

Hillary is STILL pummeling Trump in the popular vote, leading by 1.3 million last time I checked

How many millions of PV does she need to trade in for enough EV to win?

and your white trash fascist barely squeaked in thanks to just barely winning 4 key swing states and the archaic, outdated electoral college.

White trash fascist?

You really are stupid, aren't you?


He only needed enough of those swing states to get to 270.

With 306 in his column, seems he did it fairly easily.

archaic? Outdated?

Keep that up, and we'll have to get you a bigger dunce cap

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

They're a fucking broken record. Same shit, over and over and over....they never evolve. They hate that the world is leaving them behind, so they cling to the only things they know.

The irony of this post boggles the mind!

 

[AntonToo]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

uumm...Republicans?

 

[g5000]

W was so stupid however, it is hard to imagine lightning striking twice in the same place.

At least W had experience in the executive branch of government.

 

[AntonToo]

W was so stupid however, it is hard to imagine lightning striking twice in the same place.

At least W had experience in the executive branch of government.

...and wasn't a pathological liar and a ridiculous blowhard.

 

[rdean]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Explain "anti science". I'm not following that one.

Is he against technology? Medicine? I'm not getting your point.

Bush Remarks On 'Intelligent Design' Theory Fuel Debate

 

[rdean]

W was so stupid however, it is hard to imagine lightning striking twice in the same place.

At least W had experience in the executive branch of government.

...and wasn't a pathological liar and a ridiculous blowhard.

To tell the truth, it's never been clear to me Bush wasn't lied to about Iraq by the rest of his administration. Maybe he was duped like us and really did believe Iraq had WMD's.

 

[rdean]

Republicans used reconciliation three times under George Bush. Will they use it under Trump?

Trump wants to spend a trillion dollars on infrastructure. Would it really go to building things or just be subsidies for his friends.

Corporate taxes were cut under Bush. Then there was the enormous Bush Tax cuts with most going to the top 2 or 3 percent. And all the deregulation Trump promises.

How did that work out under Bush. What will Trump do different when he describes the same policies?

 

[hadit]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Your XB45-J foil helmet is on too tight.

 

[rdean]

And speaking of "tax cuts for the rich"

There's this

The top 1% of Americans, who have an average income of more than $2.1 million, pay 43.6% of all the federal individual income tax in the U.S.; the top 0.1% — just 115,000 households, whose average income is more than $9.4 million — pay more than 20% of it.

Time for the freeloaders to step up and pay their FAIR SHARE!

When I was a kid, the average CEO made about 15 to 20 times the lowest paid employee in the company. Now they are paid thousands of times what lowest paid employee gets. Is it because they are suddenly so smart? So hard working? So deserving? Because they were able to pay politicians to change the laws so the average guy gets screwed while they get over? Inherited forty million from dad? All of the above?

 

[Jackson]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Because your paranoia is coming through.

 

[rdean]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Because your paranoia is coming through.

Or it could be Bush's policies will be Trump's policies on steroids. What is it you think Trump will do different than Bush?

 

[Little-Acorn]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Because you keep listening to, and lapping up unquestionably, the same liberal lies over and over; and you never bother checking if any of them are actually true.

 

[rdean]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Because you keep listening to, and lapping up unquestionably, the same liberal lies over and over; and you never bother checking if any of them are actually true.

And the examples are?

 

[emilynghiem]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Explain "anti science". I'm not following that one.

Is he against technology? Medicine? I'm not getting your point.

Dear rdean Death Angel
1. Do you mean global warming science? Both sides argue the other is skewing science to fit their arguments that both remain faith based
2. What about ignoring science on homosexuality and studies on identical twins not being genetically determined.
3. What about refusing to consider cases of people who change orientation after spiritual healing? And including that in research to find if they were born heterosexual and not really changing?
4. What about science that is used to argue individual identity begins at conception?

Aren't there as many areas on both sides left and right where politics is used to override science?

 

[owebo]

Tax cuts for the rich.

Anti science

Deregulation.

Hawks.

Why am I getting this terrible sense of Déjà vu? Why does all this seem so familiar?

Did you think you said something?