Why again doesn't England, Spain, France, Portugal and Norway have to answer for slavery here?

You seriously comparing slavery in the US of that in Europe?
I know you guys have a bad education system, but didnt know it was that bad. OMG!!!
No! Who is doing that? What an obtuse stupid comment.
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.

Same reason no one here owes anyone reparations: because they aren't liable for the bad actions of their great-great-great grandparents.
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.


You left out Africa and the muslims in the north of Africa..who are still practicing slavery to this day.

Great!! Lets use a African Warlord as our moral compass...
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.

Reparations were make by England for the slaves 30 years before the civil war. Just reparation you don't expect.

".....The amount of money to be spent on the payments was set at "the Sum of Twenty Million Pounds Sterling".[20] Under the terms of the Act, the British government raised £20 million[21] (worth £1.43 billion in 2020[22]) to pay out for the loss of the slaves as business assets to the registered owners of the freed slaves. In 1833,"

 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.

Same reason no one here owes anyone reparations: because they aren't liable for the bad actions of their great-great-great grandparents.

Yet Children of Slaves became Slaves themselves...
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.
I understand the others, but Norway? Were they involved in the slave trade?
Yes unfortunately it was however not formally as Norway. During the height of the slave trade Norway was part of Denmark which was involved in the slave trade from the Danish West Indies. Norwegians were still involved though.
 
Celebrating the Confederacy is a celebration of slavery.

No other way to define it.
Not sure who is celebrating the Confederacy. Not wanting historically significant statues and plaques torn down is not exactly "celebrating" rebel forces but our history per se.
I don't know why the left believes erasing the past will end interest in it (like hiding Playboy magazines from the kids). It only increases curiosity and interest in it.

Erasing history and public figures considered "counter revolutionary" is how the Soviet Union operated so of course the far left mimics them as an homage to their political progenitors.

Check your prejudices.
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.

Same reason no one here owes anyone reparations: because they aren't liable for the bad actions of their great-great-great grandparents.

Yet Children of Slaves became Slaves themselves...

Which changes nothing that I said, since those children happen to BE the great-great-grandparents in question, moron.

None of the people involved are alive now. Haven't been for a long time. The people who are alive now are not responsible for what their ancestors did.
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.
why is Norway on the list?
Because the vikings were also slave Traders?
 
It was the USA that ended it in less than 100 years after it had been going on for over 3 centuries on behalf of those specific countries.

Is it racist of me to ask this? We know the left will not address cause they never do address how African warlords and nations were complicate in the slave trade. Just pointing that fact out is racist, for no other reason other than it is a fact. Yes, facts are racist....to them.

So, do those European countries owe reparations and should the EU pay it?

No? Why? Please explain.
A few reasons helped...

First Europe abolished slavery in various forms much earlier than US... UK abolish the trade of slaves 60 years before US...
In that period of time the US population of Slaves had gone from 1 million to 4 million...
The Population in England in 1800 was 10,000 and slavery wasn't common and was abolished 3 years later..

Massive differences in the size of what happened...

Then there is what happened afterwards... UK got free education, healthcare, .... Racism existed in UK but it wasn't as harsh as in US. US system was to have them poor and uneducated and keep them that way..
 
Also, US practice
  • Hereditary slavery was a fundamental aspect of the oppressive system of chattel slavery that developed in the Americas.
Most places in Europe stated that slaves's children were free. In US the children were also slaves...
 
Back
Top Bottom