Moonglow
Diamond Member
I am sure she has eyes.ME too....but she is a looker.......for a democrat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am sure she has eyes.ME too....but she is a looker.......for a democrat
She does........Ted Danson got a bunch of that......Ted's gotta do what Ted's gotta do..........but it's always great seeing people figure things out........that lightbulb is now going off.I am sure she has eyes.
She's not bright......the point of this, is that she finally learned something.......and was like...Holy shit the 1% isn't just a bunch of white billionaires playing golf on their yachts.........this is the begining of being redpilled.........she is now finding out that the things people say in the media are complete shit.............it will be interesting..........will she continue to learn the truth, or does she have to shut it down and comply as the left cracks their bullwhip.......only time will tell
The rich have gotten even richer under your tax scheme. The gap between them and us has widened. And we need the money. So time to raise taxes on the rich.No, she didn't understand it, because she bitched about Trumps tax cuts..........it's amazing when you shed ignorance and understand an issue.....how you leave the left behind.....it's almost predictable.
I'll break this down to a post for every point:The rich have gotten even richer under your tax scheme. The gap between them and us has widened. And we need the money. So time to raise taxes on the rich.
She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.
I showed my brother, who's a multi millionaire, that not even he has to pay the death tax when he dies. Doesn't have enough. He was surprised.
Please tell me what harm will come if we raise taxes on the rich. What will happen?
She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.The rich have gotten even richer under your tax scheme. The gap between them and us has widened. And we need the money. So time to raise taxes on the rich.
She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.
I showed my brother, who's a multi millionaire, that not even he has to pay the death tax when he dies. Doesn't have enough. He was surprised.
Please tell me what harm will come if we raise taxes on the rich. What will happen?
I showed my brother, who's a multi millionaire, that not even he has to pay the death tax when he dies. Doesn't have enough. He was surprised.She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.
She may be worried about her self......but her arguments were for the lower end of that bracket and most democrats would be shocked that $400,000 is the ultra evil top 1%, because the democrats and the media lie about it and always make it to be only the Forbes top 50. It's amazing how people don't know basic information...So now that she realizes that bracket is more than that...and that means 99% of the people earn less than $400,000.........so in order to get real money...you have to raise taxes on people less than $400,000.......there aren't that many millionaires to matter.
Please tell me what harm will come if we raise taxes on the rich. What will happen?The rich have gotten even richer under your tax scheme. The gap between them and us has widened. And we need the money. So time to raise taxes on the rich.
She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.
I showed my brother, who's a multi millionaire, that not even he has to pay the death tax when he dies. Doesn't have enough. He was surprised.
Please tell me what harm will come if we raise taxes on the rich. What will happen?
Household incomes have grown only modestly in this century, and household wealth has not returned to its pre-recession level. Economic inequality, whether measured through the gaps in income or wealth between richer and poorer households, continues to widen.I'll break this down to a post for every point:
You say that every year....when did the rich not get richer?
Oh shut the fuck up you tool.I showed my brother, who's a multi millionaire, that not even he has to pay the death tax when he dies. Doesn't have enough. He was surprised.
Ok, so good for him......so do you hate him and despise him for doing well? Does he have too much money? Should he just give it away? Does he work hard for his money? I'm going to assume he didn't inherit it since you didn't include yourself in the rich bracket.
Lame old arguments you guys have been making for years.Please tell me what harm will come if we raise taxes on the rich. What will happen?
The harm is, the people you want to punish...there isn't enough of them to matter......first part
Second, the people making 6 figures....are the ones that create jobs.........you tax them, you get less jobs.......do you know why? I mean if your brother is a millionaire, you must know how it works, correct?
Again, that is a lie......the govt was not awash in red ink because of tax cuts..........at the end of Reagan's term, he DOUBLED the money in the treasurey....Lets start with the basics.......How do you double your income but go into more debt?Household incomes have grown only modestly in this century, and household wealth has not returned to its pre-recession level. Economic inequality, whether measured through the gaps in income or wealth between richer and poorer households, continues to widen.
And it all started on Reagan's watch
Roll Back the Reagan Tax Cuts | Common Dreams
Our bridges are falling apart (among other things), and its Ronald Reagan's fault. A few hours before the bridge collapsed in Minnesota, a news release landed (among hundreds) in my email inbox. It was from the right-wing "Heartland Institute" and a Minnesota conservative group calling itself...www.commondreams.org
But the rich fought back, and won big-time in 1980 when Reagan won. Reagan promptly cut income taxes on the very rich from 70% down to 27%. Corporate tax rates were also cut so severely that they went from representing over 33% of total federal tax receipts in 1951 to less than 9% in 1983 (they're still in that neighborhood, the lowest in the industrialized world).
The result was devastating. Our government was suddenly so badly awash in red ink that Reagan doubled the tax paid only by people earning less than $40,000/year (FICA), and then began borrowing from the huge surplus this new tax was accumulating in the Social Security Trust Fund.
In addition to badly throwing the nation into debt, Reagan's tax cut blew out the ceiling on the accumulation of wealth, leading to a new Gilded Age and the rise of a generation of super-wealthy that hadn't been seen since the Robber Baron era of the 1890s or the Roaring 20s.
So your brother is ok to be a millionaire, but others aren't? What are you saying?Oh shut the fuck up you tool.
Well Corporate taxes are different than income taxes.......first lets do that......but most small and medium businesses are paid through their personal taxes...which is why raising them is bad.......you have to incorporate before you pay corporate taxes.......most small business are LLC or proprietorships.......Lame old arguments you guys have been making for years.
Yes, if you raise taxes on the rich and corporations, it will add up to a lot of money.
Not enough to feed all the pork the democrats can dream up.Lame old arguments you guys have been making for years.
Yes, if you raise taxes on the rich and corporations, it will add up to a lot of money.
Making $400,000 a year means you are rich, and you know it.She's worrying about people who make $400,000 a year? I don't think so. I think she's worried about her $40 million dollars.
She may be worried about her self......but her arguments were for the lower end of that bracket and most democrats would be shocked that $400,000 is the ultra evil top 1%, because the democrats and the media lie about it and always make it to be only the Forbes top 50. It's amazing how people don't know basic information...So now that she realizes that bracket is more than that...and that means 99% of the people earn less than $400,000.........so in order to get real money...you have to raise taxes on people less than $400,000.......there aren't that many millionaires to matter.
suddenly far, far fewer people will be making $400,000/yr...... Tax $400,000 and up, suddenly ......
Don't worry about it. You'll never make that.suddenly far, far fewer people will be making $400,000/yr.
Remember we had all those high paying union manufacturing jobs making $80,000 a year but you sent all those good jobs overseas? Suddenly, far, far fewer people are making $80,000. You didn't care then about them why suddenly do you cry for people making $400K plus?suddenly far, far fewer people will be making $400,000/yr.
on taxes...
Whoopi Goldberg Rails Against Her Taxes
To mark Tax Day, Whoopi Goldberg, a strong critic of high taxes, railed against how much the government takes from her paycheck. On the April 15 edition of "The View," Whoopi displayed some of her bills with the many government fees attached to it. She also felt she was being punished for her...www.newsbusters.org
She figured it out the Horrible TOP 1%..the top of the top......the big super rich folk.....starts at.,.......drumroll........$400,000.
Sure that's a good amount of money.......but those people don't have 4 mansions and drive around in Ferraris all day...........It's amazing what happens when you stop and actually think.......and say, wait the stuff the media tells us is full of shit.....maybe she'll get there......I doubt it.....but he mind has now been slightly opened......I'm curious to see where this goes.