Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 32,121
- 28,015
- 2,788
- Thread starter
- #21
Are you saying that you don't believe CNN?So now you guys believe CNN.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you saying that you don't believe CNN?So now you guys believe CNN.
The poll in the OP included indies who voted for Trump. The poll in the OP is Trump against Harris. That is the whole point. You continue trying to argue that apples and oranges are the same thing.The polls this week say Indies oppose Trump 2 to 1. He would lose handily.
His victory was very, very narrow, certainly not a trouncing.
You need to go back to post #1I seriously doubt Trump would win if the election was held today.
You dont.
Since I don't hate "the white man' but I do dislike the white racist, you are unable to navigate any conversation.No, but it provides the context of the discussion.
I realize it's not about hating the white man, so you lack any skills in navigating the conversation.
Have a nice day.
ObviouslySpoiler alert. Trump would still trounce Harris. That's the bad news for the dems. CNN (not Fox News) data guru Harry Enten breaks the bad news to the democrats and tells them that they live in a "Fanciful universe".
CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten on Thursday revealed stunning polls that showed even an “unpopular” Donald Trump could squash Democrats at the voting booth – calling it a “major wake-up moment” for the president’s rival party.
“If Democrats think that at this particular point, just because Donald Trump is unpopular, that they’re going to run away with it like a Heisman Trophy winner – that is not necessarily the case. These numbers should be a major wake-up moment for Democrats,” Enten said.
![]()
CNN data guru reveals Trump can still trounce Democrats despite polls calling president ‘unpopular’: ‘Major wake-up moment’
Harry Enten argued that the president’s unfavorable ratings don’t look nearly as drastic when viewed side-by-side with Democrats in office.www.yahoo.com
video link
Spoiler alert. Trump would still trounce Harris. That's the bad news for the dems. CNN (not Fox News) data guru Harry Enten breaks the bad news to the democrats and tells them that they live in a "Fanciful universe".
CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten on Thursday revealed stunning polls that showed even an “unpopular” Donald Trump could squash Democrats at the voting booth – calling it a “major wake-up moment” for the president’s rival party.
“If Democrats think that at this particular point, just because Donald Trump is unpopular, that they’re going to run away with it like a Heisman Trophy winner – that is not necessarily the case. These numbers should be a major wake-up moment for Democrats,” Enten said.
![]()
CNN data guru reveals Trump can still trounce Democrats despite polls calling president ‘unpopular’: ‘Major wake-up moment’
Harry Enten argued that the president’s unfavorable ratings don’t look nearly as drastic when viewed side-by-side with Democrats in office.www.yahoo.com
video link
No, all I need to do is look around the country and what I see are millions of people who are pissed off t Trump. You're a cult member, so you live in fantasy landYou need to go back to post #1
Yeah. The more the voters told them that they want democrats to move to the center, the more democrats are convinced they should move even further left, doubling down on trannies and keeping illegal thugs and gang members in our country.You all don't have a competent candidate.
Exactly.Trump won by 1.5 percent. Since when has that been a trouncing?
Using your logic, if Trump beat Harris before and would beat her again even now, if Republicans had a more "competent" candidate, how badly would dems lose then?You dont.
Correct, we have a competent POTUS. Cope harder.You dont.
Proof that almost every one of the 50 states is red, including California and New York.
Since I don't hate "the white man' but I do dislike the white racist, you are unable to navigate any conversation.
If you want to talk about context, the fact that there are protests all over the nation and people are so mad at Republicans that they run away from town halls, that perhaps the opinion of a CNN anchor based on limited conversations is not the proper context in which to make claims.
I don't think people would be voting for Trump after what he has done. Many people voted for him because he said he would lower prices. Some of the people fired by DOGE vted fr Trump. Farmers who are now getting screwed, voted for trump. Now given the fact that everything Harris said Trump would do he has done, if they had t campaign again, Trump would not win.Using your logic, if Trump beat Harris before and would beat her again even now, if Republicans had a more "competent" candidate, how badly would dems lose then?