Who was the most racist President?

[IM2]

The Civil Rights Act was necessary because whites could not be trusted to act responsibly

Rubbish.

My honky grandfather served African Americans in his store long before the Civil Rights Act was passed. My other honky grandfather would sell chickens and eggs and produce to whomever had the money, regardless of their ethnicity.

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

I'm sure racism still does exist in New York. But it doesn't exist out here in MAGA Country. Notice how Eric Garner got whacked in the Big Apple, and Lacquan McDonald got iced in Far Left Chicago?

The racism in America is concentrated is Ultraliberal cities.

MAGA country is racist country.

 

[CWayne]

That was a common idea back then
What do we do with all these free slaves?
Setting up their own country was a common solution

Lincoln quickly learned it was unworkable and dropped the idea

Actually he kept trying to get black to agree to move.

"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes [back to Africa], and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan [of colonization]. There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks.

I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal. Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro...under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can NEVER do here [in America]. We can never attain the ideal Union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, INFERIOR RACE among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable."

Abraham Lincoln
September 1862

1862 America

Colonization of former slaved had been tried in Liberia and was a popular solution. Lincoln did not invent it

Lincoln was right about Negroes assimilating in our society. The problem was not the blacks but the whites who didn’t want to interact with them

As it was, it took another 100 years before whites allowed them to integrate

Colonization was only popular among whites. Blacks opposed Lincolns idea.

In hindsight, slavery might have been a bad idea.
But ending slavery, without returning them to their native land was worse.
Who actually thought that slave owner descendants and slave descendants would simply say what the hell, let's pretend to be equal now?

That is an odd thing to say. By the time that slavery ended in the United States, there was no slave who had been born in Africa alive. Every one of them was native-born people. They were already in their home country.

 

[Polishprince]

Rubbish.

My honky grandfather served African Americans in his store long before the Civil Rights Act was passed. My other honky grandfather would sell chickens and eggs and produce to whomever had the money, regardless of their ethnicity.

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

I'm sure racism still does exist in New York. But it doesn't exist out here in MAGA Country. Notice how Eric Garner got whacked in the Big Apple, and Lacquan McDonald got iced in Far Left Chicago?

The racism in America is concentrated is Ultraliberal cities.

MAGA country is racist country.

Contrary to the claims of Liberal Activist Jussie Smollett, Chicago isn't "MAGA country" at all.

 

[Third Party]

No, I said you cannot ask, "Why were all those civil rights acts necessary?" And you can't. What you're doing is trying to play a childish game but you still cannot ask yourself that question. And no matter how you try playing your silly game, it is a question that you are too scared and dishonest to answer.

OK, Why were all those civil rights acts necessary? You seem to think YOU have all the answers, show the rest of us how smart you think you are.

No. You figure it since you and those like you continue to excuse the continuing history of white racism in this country.

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

What's interesting now about the Republican Passed Civil Rights Act is the fact that libs now say that it was passed to guarantee people the right to engage in alternative sexuality.

A current case before the SCOTUS says that this law outlaws discrimination against Trannies and She-Males.

There was no republican passed civil rights act and todays republican party would not vote for it.

Was the Emancipation Proclamation a "CIVIL Rights Act"?

 

[Third Party]

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

The Civil Rights Act was necessary because whites could not be trusted to act responsibly

Rubbish.

My honky grandfather served African Americans in his store long before the Civil Rights Act was passed. My other honky grandfather would sell chickens and eggs and produce to whomever had the money, regardless of their ethnicity.

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

Black and white

 

[Third Party]

OK, Why were all those civil rights acts necessary? You seem to think YOU have all the answers, show the rest of us how smart you think you are.

No. You figure it since you and those like you continue to excuse the continuing history of white racism in this country.

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

We are talking about 3 different civil rights acts. And they happened because whites refused to follow the law.

It wasn't against the law to discriminate back in the day, so it had nothing to do with so-called "whites" refusing to "follow the law".

BTW, I object to the term "white". My skin isn't white by any definition of the color. In fact the only truly white people I've ever seen are a few local albinos who are ironically part of the so-called "black" race.

Pathetic. Civil rights laws were passed, that meant no more discrimination. But whites refused to follow those civil rights laws. I object to your racism and my skin isn't black. You have not seen albinos that are part of the black race. So as long as you talk about a black race, you are white.

Would you prefer a different name...?

 

[Billiejeens]

Actually he kept trying to get black to agree to move.

"I have urged the colonization of the Negroes [back to Africa], and I shall continue. My Emancipation Proclamation was linked with this plan [of colonization]. There is no room for two distinct races of White men in America, much less for two distinct races of Whites and Blacks.

I can think of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the Negro into our social and political life as our equal. Within twenty years we can peacefully colonize the Negro...under conditions in which he can rise to the full measure of manhood. This he can NEVER do here [in America]. We can never attain the ideal Union our fathers dreamed, with millions of an alien, INFERIOR RACE among us, whose assimilation is neither possible nor desirable."

Abraham Lincoln
September 1862

1862 America

Colonization of former slaved had been tried in Liberia and was a popular solution. Lincoln did not invent it

Lincoln was right about Negroes assimilating in our society. The problem was not the blacks but the whites who didn’t want to interact with them

As it was, it took another 100 years before whites allowed them to integrate

Colonization was only popular among whites. Blacks opposed Lincolns idea.

In hindsight, slavery might have been a bad idea.
But ending slavery, without returning them to their native land was worse.
Who actually thought that slave owner descendants and slave descendants would simply say what the hell, let's pretend to be equal now?

That is an odd thing to say. By the time that slavery ended in the United States, there was no slave who had been born in Africa alive. Every one of them was native-born people. They were already in their home country.

I laugh

 

[IM2]

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

I'm sure racism still does exist in New York. But it doesn't exist out here in MAGA Country. Notice how Eric Garner got whacked in the Big Apple, and Lacquan McDonald got iced in Far Left Chicago?

The racism in America is concentrated is Ultraliberal cities.

MAGA country is racist country.

Contrary to the claims of Liberal Activist Jussie Smollett, Chicago isn't "MAGA country" at all.

I live in MAGA country son. MAGA country is racist country.

 

[IM2]

The Civil Rights Act was necessary because whites could not be trusted to act responsibly

Rubbish.

My honky grandfather served African Americans in his store long before the Civil Rights Act was passed. My other honky grandfather would sell chickens and eggs and produce to whomever had the money, regardless of their ethnicity.

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

Black and white

White. What you call black racism isn't even racism.

 

[Polishprince]

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

I'm sure racism still does exist in New York. But it doesn't exist out here in MAGA Country. Notice how Eric Garner got whacked in the Big Apple, and Lacquan McDonald got iced in Far Left Chicago?

The racism in America is concentrated is Ultraliberal cities.

MAGA country is racist country.

Contrary to the claims of Liberal Activist Jussie Smollett, Chicago isn't "MAGA country" at all.

I live in MAGA country son. MAGA country is racist country.

So you say, but all of the African American youths getting killed are doing it in Deep Blue Cities. Not happening in MAGA Country

 

[IM2]

No. You figure it since you and those like you continue to excuse the continuing history of white racism in this country.

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

We are talking about 3 different civil rights acts. And they happened because whites refused to follow the law.

It wasn't against the law to discriminate back in the day, so it had nothing to do with so-called "whites" refusing to "follow the law".

BTW, I object to the term "white". My skin isn't white by any definition of the color. In fact the only truly white people I've ever seen are a few local albinos who are ironically part of the so-called "black" race.

Pathetic. Civil rights laws were passed, that meant no more discrimination. But whites refused to follow those civil rights laws. I object to your racism and my skin isn't black. You have not seen albinos that are part of the black race. So as long as you talk about a black race, you are white.

Would you prefer a different name...?

Tell that to your fellow white boy who claimed to be offended by being called white while his ***** ass feels fine calling people black.

 

[IM2]

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

I'm sure racism still does exist in New York. But it doesn't exist out here in MAGA Country. Notice how Eric Garner got whacked in the Big Apple, and Lacquan McDonald got iced in Far Left Chicago?

The racism in America is concentrated is Ultraliberal cities.

MAGA country is racist country.

Contrary to the claims of Liberal Activist Jussie Smollett, Chicago isn't "MAGA country" at all.

I live in MAGA country son. MAGA country is racist country.

So you say, but all of the African American youths getting killed are doing it in Deep Blue Cities. Not happening in MAGA Country

So I know. And since white youths and adults are getting killed everywhere, your white ass should maybe pay more attention to that.

 

[IM2]

OK, Why were all those civil rights acts necessary? You seem to think YOU have all the answers, show the rest of us how smart you think you are.

No. You figure it since you and those like you continue to excuse the continuing history of white racism in this country.

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

What's interesting now about the Republican Passed Civil Rights Act is the fact that libs now say that it was passed to guarantee people the right to engage in alternative sexuality.

A current case before the SCOTUS says that this law outlaws discrimination against Trannies and She-Males.

There was no republican passed civil rights act and todays republican party would not vote for it.

Was the Emancipation Proclamation a "CIVIL Rights Act"?

The national policy of apartheid that resulted after the EP violated the civil rights of blacks. You know that or you're totally ignorant. Stop asking stupid questions. Unless you're stupid.

 

[Third Party]

Rubbish.

My honky grandfather served African Americans in his store long before the Civil Rights Act was passed. My other honky grandfather would sell chickens and eggs and produce to whomever had the money, regardless of their ethnicity.

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

Black and white

White. What you call black racism isn't even racism.

Your're CRAZY. Black AND white racism. Your're welcome for the lesson.

 

[Third Party]

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

We are talking about 3 different civil rights acts. And they happened because whites refused to follow the law.

It wasn't against the law to discriminate back in the day, so it had nothing to do with so-called "whites" refusing to "follow the law".

BTW, I object to the term "white". My skin isn't white by any definition of the color. In fact the only truly white people I've ever seen are a few local albinos who are ironically part of the so-called "black" race.

Pathetic. Civil rights laws were passed, that meant no more discrimination. But whites refused to follow those civil rights laws. I object to your racism and my skin isn't black. You have not seen albinos that are part of the black race. So as long as you talk about a black race, you are white.

Would you prefer a different name...?

Tell that to your fellow white boy who claimed to be offended by being called white while his ***** ass feels fine calling people black.

You didn't answer-yes or no...

 

[Third Party]

No. You figure it since you and those like you continue to excuse the continuing history of white racism in this country.

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

What's interesting now about the Republican Passed Civil Rights Act is the fact that libs now say that it was passed to guarantee people the right to engage in alternative sexuality.

A current case before the SCOTUS says that this law outlaws discrimination against Trannies and She-Males.

There was no republican passed civil rights act and todays republican party would not vote for it.

Was the Emancipation Proclamation a "CIVIL Rights Act"?

The national policy of apartheid that resulted after the EP violated the civil rights of blacks. You know that or you're totally ignorant. Stop asking stupid questions. Unless you're stupid.

You never answer a question directly, do you? You make speeches off them. Was the EP a civil rights act or not???

 

[IM2]

And the millions of other whites in the south?

FW Woolworth was a New York corporation, it had nothing to do with "The South".

Malcolm X lived in New York. Racism still exists there.

Black and white

White. What you call black racism isn't even racism.

Your're CRAZY. Black AND white racism. Your're welcome for the lesson.

No, I'm perfectly sane. Come talk to me about black racism after whites have endured this:

lynching, raping, oppressing, exploiting, shooting, jailing, whipping, maiming, torturing, evangelizing, robbing, stereotyping, bullying, bombing, segregating, building highways and thruways to dislocate businesses, communities and neighborhoods; creating SUN-DOWN towns, experimenting on, discriminating against, prohibiting, murdering, holding back/controlling in every imaginable way while HATING WHITE PEOPLE en mass via de jure and de facto racism for HUNDREDS of years;

from blacks.

 

[IM2]

OK, I'll answer for you. The Civil Rights Act was necessary because the black man could not take care of himself and needed the white man to help him.

What's interesting now about the Republican Passed Civil Rights Act is the fact that libs now say that it was passed to guarantee people the right to engage in alternative sexuality.

A current case before the SCOTUS says that this law outlaws discrimination against Trannies and She-Males.

There was no republican passed civil rights act and todays republican party would not vote for it.

Was the Emancipation Proclamation a "CIVIL Rights Act"?

The national policy of apartheid that resulted after the EP violated the civil rights of blacks. You know that or you're totally ignorant. Stop asking stupid questions. Unless you're stupid.

You never answer a question directly, do you? You make speeches off them. Was the EP a civil rights act or not???

The national policy of apartheid that resulted after the EP violated the civil rights of blacks. You know that or you're totally ignorant. Stop asking stupid questions. Unless you're stupid.

 

[IM2]

We are talking about 3 different civil rights acts. And they happened because whites refused to follow the law.

It wasn't against the law to discriminate back in the day, so it had nothing to do with so-called "whites" refusing to "follow the law".

BTW, I object to the term "white". My skin isn't white by any definition of the color. In fact the only truly white people I've ever seen are a few local albinos who are ironically part of the so-called "black" race.

Pathetic. Civil rights laws were passed, that meant no more discrimination. But whites refused to follow those civil rights laws. I object to your racism and my skin isn't black. You have not seen albinos that are part of the black race. So as long as you talk about a black race, you are white.

Would you prefer a different name...?

Tell that to your fellow white boy who claimed to be offended by being called white while his ***** ass feels fine calling people black.

You didn't answer-yes or no...

Tell that to your fellow white boy who claimed to be offended by being called white while his ***** ass feels fine calling people black.

 

[jasonnfree]

I think Blacks would know best who were the racists and non racists. Look at who they vote for. They've voted heavily democratic for the last sixty or so years. Reagan, a republican, was known to say to nixon “Last night, I tell you, to watch that thing on television as I did,” Reagan said. “To see those, those monkeys from those African countries — damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes.” Nixon began laughing hard.
A history of racism is woven into the US presidency