WHO Jumped On the Media's Anti-HCL Bandwagon!

JimofPennsylvan

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
905
Reaction score
599
Points
910
The World Heath Organization reported today that it is stopping the study of hydroxychloroquine (HCL) as a therapeutic for covid 19. This is just one of the highlights of the world's science community and their co-conspirators, the U.S. media community, efforts to kill HCL in its valuable life saving role of combating Covid 19 for mankind! In medical schools for generations to come they should use the examples of the HCL studies done in these times as an example of how not to design medical studies to evaluate potential pharmaceutical therapies for a disease that such study designers should not ignore the science on how the pharmaceutical works on the human body. Specifically, they should call out how the health care professionals involved in these studies ignored the science behind HCL that it obstructs activation of dendritic cells which trigger T and B immune cells to fight antigens attacking the body and how a drug like that should never have been given to patients with compromised immune systems that are fighting a viral infection that has at least taken a significant hold in the patients body.

One recent big study that came out this past friday in the Lancet that the media wants to use to pronounce HCL as dead as a therapeutic for Covid 19 was a large observational study that included 96 thousand patients from 671 hospitals from 6 continents; of course the study had the fatal flaw of including at least thirty percent of the patients taking HCL or its sister drug CL with significant comorbidity these groups probably had higher comorbidity rates but it is unclear from the study report how many patients had multiple comorbidities so the lower number was put forth. This study found that HCL and CL did not offer any benefit in treating Covid 19 and caused a significant increase in heart arrhythmia and thus posed a significant increase in the risk of heart related death. The media ignored a lot of the contents of the study but if one looks at this content from a responsible person perspective it is informative about the value of the study; drug studies should be fair should they not! The study found in the control group (no HCL and no CL) 11.1% died in the hospital, in the HCL group 18 % died, in the HCL plus an antibiotic group 23.8 % died, in the CL group 16.4% died and in the CL plus antibiotic group 22.2% died. The American people know that 1.69 million people tested positive for the disease in the U.S. and 98460 of these people died so America is experiencing a 5.8% death rate. If the studies control group has a death rate of almost twice that of the overall disease affecting America how is this a fair evaluation of this drug your giving it to really sick people people that have the disease people that are at a stage where it really has progressed. The science of the drug, HCL, indicates you don't give it to people with weakened immune system and the value of the drug is it increases the PH of cells so it interferes with the virus movement into the center of good cells and HCL interferes with the structures of viruses receptors inhibiting viruses ability to identify and latch on to good cells. To put it another way HCL just weakens the virus's ability to attack good cells it buys the human body some time to mount an immune system response the science indicates it would have minimal efficacy to start giving it to patients shortly before or once they enter the ICU, the science indicates it was never the drug for these really sick Covid 19 people.

The other really informative thing about this study, is that in the control group these patient were not given HCL and CL but many of them were given anti-viral drugs the doctors for these patient followed the science they brought optimal intelligence to the whole issue. In the control group forty and a half percent received one or more of the following: lopinar, ritonavir (HIV antiviral drugs); ribnavirin (Hepatitis C antiviral drug) and oseltamivir (flu antiviral drug). Common sense would indicate that it was probably these antivirals that saved a lot of these patients lives that took these drugs. The best outcome for the world is that the world-wide medical profession not discard any drug that can play a valuable role in fighting Covid 19; HCL is cheap and fairly readily available throughout the world. HCL has another valuable quality about it in so far that it has the ability to transport Zinc into cells and Zinc interferes with virus's replication with all this media and big shot doctors and scientist campaign to paint HCL as a fool's effort as a therapeutic for Covid 19 it is hoped that the world and America does not lose a valuable prophylactic drug or immediate post exposure drug for Covid 19!
 
The best outcome for the world is that the world-wide medical profession not discard any drug that can play a valuable role in fighting Covid 19; HCL is cheap and fairly readily available throughout the world.
It's also homeopathic , unacceptable by empirical medicine Jim

~S~
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.

was this via "operation warp speed" Biker....?


~S~
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.

was this via "operation warp speed" Biker....?


~S~

Operation warp speed is for vaccines.
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.

was this via "operation warp speed" Biker....?


~S~

Operation warp speed is for vaccines.

yes it is Biker

censored crazy lady Judy Mikovits (sp?) aka 'plandemic' mentioned it being tested on the military

if true, one wonders what results they had?

~S~
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.

was this via "operation warp speed" Biker....?


~S~

Operation warp speed is for vaccines.

yes it is Biker

censored crazy lady Judy Mikovits (sp?) aka 'plandemic' mentioned it being tested on the military

if true, one wonders what results they had?

~S~

To tell you the truth, there is a lot of hope that this treatment will be effective. So far, it's proved to be fairly good. The only people who don't respond well are those that have been put on ventilators, but we also know that hydroxychloroquinine causes problems like that, but much worse than remdesivir. Remdedivir apparently works better.


Remdesivir, the only drug cleared to treat Covid-19, sped the recovery time of patients with the disease, but its benefit appeared much more limited in patients who needed mechanical ventilation as part of their treatment, according to eagerly awaited results of a clinical trial.


Initial results from the study, which led to the drug’s emergency authorization by the Food and Drug Administration, were released late last month. Full data were published late Friday in the New England Journal of Medicine.


“It’s a very safe and effective drug,” said Eric Topol, founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute. “We now have a definite first efficacious drug for Covid-19, which is a major step forward and will be built upon with other drugs, [and drug] combinations.”
 
The World Heath Organization reported today that it is stopping the study of hydroxychloroquine (HCL) as a therapeutic for covid 19. This is just one of the highlights of the world's science community and their co-conspirators, the U.S. media community, efforts to kill HCL in its valuable life saving role of combating Covid 19 for mankind! In medical schools for generations to come they should use the examples of the HCL studies done in these times as an example of how not to design medical studies to evaluate potential pharmaceutical therapies for a disease that such study designers should not ignore the science on how the pharmaceutical works on the human body. Specifically, they should call out how the health care professionals involved in these studies ignored the science behind HCL that it obstructs activation of dendritic cells which trigger T and B immune cells to fight antigens attacking the body and how a drug like that should never have been given to patients with compromised immune systems that are fighting a viral infection that has at least taken a significant hold in the patients body.

One recent big study that came out this past friday in the Lancet that the media wants to use to pronounce HCL as dead as a therapeutic for Covid 19 was a large observational study that included 96 thousand patients from 671 hospitals from 6 continents; of course the study had the fatal flaw of including at least thirty percent of the patients taking HCL or its sister drug CL with significant comorbidity these groups probably had higher comorbidity rates but it is unclear from the study report how many patients had multiple comorbidities so the lower number was put forth. This study found that HCL and CL did not offer any benefit in treating Covid 19 and caused a significant increase in heart arrhythmia and thus posed a significant increase in the risk of heart related death. The media ignored a lot of the contents of the study but if one looks at this content from a responsible person perspective it is informative about the value of the study; drug studies should be fair should they not! The study found in the control group (no HCL and no CL) 11.1% died in the hospital, in the HCL group 18 % died, in the HCL plus an antibiotic group 23.8 % died, in the CL group 16.4% died and in the CL plus antibiotic group 22.2% died. The American people know that 1.69 million people tested positive for the disease in the U.S. and 98460 of these people died so America is experiencing a 5.8% death rate. If the studies control group has a death rate of almost twice that of the overall disease affecting America how is this a fair evaluation of this drug your giving it to really sick people people that have the disease people that are at a stage where it really has progressed. The science of the drug, HCL, indicates you don't give it to people with weakened immune system and the value of the drug is it increases the PH of cells so it interferes with the virus movement into the center of good cells and HCL interferes with the structures of viruses receptors inhibiting viruses ability to identify and latch on to good cells. To put it another way HCL just weakens the virus's ability to attack good cells it buys the human body some time to mount an immune system response the science indicates it would have minimal efficacy to start giving it to patients shortly before or once they enter the ICU, the science indicates it was never the drug for these really sick Covid 19 people.

The other really informative thing about this study, is that in the control group these patient were not given HCL and CL but many of them were given anti-viral drugs the doctors for these patient followed the science they brought optimal intelligence to the whole issue. In the control group forty and a half percent received one or more of the following: lopinar, ritonavir (HIV antiviral drugs); ribnavirin (Hepatitis C antiviral drug) and oseltamivir (flu antiviral drug). Common sense would indicate that it was probably these antivirals that saved a lot of these patients lives that took these drugs. The best outcome for the world is that the world-wide medical profession not discard any drug that can play a valuable role in fighting Covid 19; HCL is cheap and fairly readily available throughout the world. HCL has another valuable quality about it in so far that it has the ability to transport Zinc into cells and Zinc interferes with virus's replication with all this media and big shot doctors and scientist campaign to paint HCL as a fool's effort as a therapeutic for Covid 19 it is hoped that the world and America does not lose a valuable prophylactic drug or immediate post exposure drug for Covid 19!
Don't be stupider than you have to be, Son

The World Health Organization does not jump on media bandwagons. They do science. They run trials. This trial is reported to be costing lives so they are stopping. They have no reason to lie about it.
 
Gilead ..........LOL

Tried for an orphan status on a drug that had been studied for years with tax payers money.......They are lobbyist from hell and are the Crony Capitalist choice for their bitch.........LOL

I trust the University of Alabama who for years have studied this drug..........but it doesn't mean it's effective........Gilead wants to me the main supplier at the Covid TROUGH......................

There are many studies for the Hydroxy..... and many doctors say it is the best still........so .........what ever Malaria drugs have been around for 70 plus years.........those that say IT'S HARMFUL......LOL

Are BS artists..................

Oh..........BTW..........Gilead got a Ophan status from the FDA...........GOT BITCH SLAPPED FOR IT AND WITHDREW IT .........LOL
 
The doctors here in Amarillo haven't been using hydrochloroquinine. They have been using plasma therapy, and recently, they got in a supply of remdesivir, which was reported on the local news as the treatment they are going with here.

was this via "operation warp speed" Biker....?


~S~

Operation warp speed is for vaccines.

yes it is Biker

censored crazy lady Judy Mikovits (sp?) aka 'plandemic' mentioned it being tested on the military

if true, one wonders what results they had?

~S~

To tell you the truth, there is a lot of hope that this treatment will be effective. So far, it's proved to be fairly good. The only people who don't respond well are those that have been put on ventilators, but we also know that hydroxychloroquinine causes problems like that, but much worse than remdesivir. Remdedivir apparently works better.


Remdesivir, the only drug cleared to treat Covid-19, sped the recovery time of patients with the disease, but its benefit appeared much more limited in patients who needed mechanical ventilation as part of their treatment, according to eagerly awaited results of a clinical trial.


Initial results from the study, which led to the drug’s emergency authorization by the Food and Drug Administration, were released late last month. Full data were published late Friday in the New England Journal of Medicine.


“It’s a very safe and effective drug,” said Eric Topol, founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute. “We now have a definite first efficacious drug for Covid-19, which is a major step forward and will be built upon with other drugs, [and drug] combinations.”
The report isn't quite stellar, but i share your hope for some success Biker ~S~
 
There are many studies for the Hydroxy..... and many doctors say it is the best still........so .........what ever Malaria drugs have been around for 70 plus years.........those that say IT'S HARMFUL......LOL
because it;s homeopathic eagle

and......there's a history ....


~S~
 
There are many studies for the Hydroxy..... and many doctors say it is the best still........so .........what ever Malaria drugs have been around for 70 plus years.........those that say IT'S HARMFUL......LOL
because it;s homeopathic eagle

and......there's a history ....


~S~
LOL

It is used for Lupus and as a precaution for Malaria........hell I took it before going to Kenya.........it has been studied for use by Universities since 2003 SARs........this is nothing new....

Most reports I read are that it is a pathway in for the Zinc to kill the virus..........aka STOP the body from producing so much that it kills you.........

By itself...........maybe it can be prevention......Doctors are using it......as prevention......DOCTORS are doing so.............Are these Doctors homeopathic.??????
 
There are many studies for the Hydroxy..... and many doctors say it is the best still........so .........what ever Malaria drugs have been around for 70 plus years.........those that say IT'S HARMFUL......LOL
because it;s homeopathic eagle

and......there's a history ....


~S~
LOL

It is used for Lupus and as a precaution for Malaria........hell I took it before going to Kenya.........it has been studied for use by Universities since 2003 SARs........this is nothing new....

Most reports I read are that it is a pathway in for the Zinc to kill the virus..........aka STOP the body from producing so much that it kills you.........

By itself...........maybe it can be prevention......Doctors are using it......as prevention......DOCTORS are doing so.............Are these Doctors homeopathic.??????

yes it's preventative , in that we as 'host' can survive lower PH levels than most virus' , and no Dr in his/her right mind would maintain good standing in the AMA treating 'homeopathically' , lest they be ousted , and summarily dismissed as witch doctors Eagle

~S~
 
There are many studies for the Hydroxy..... and many doctors say it is the best still........so .........what ever Malaria drugs have been around for 70 plus years.........those that say IT'S HARMFUL......LOL
because it;s homeopathic eagle

and......there's a history ....


~S~
LOL

It is used for Lupus and as a precaution for Malaria........hell I took it before going to Kenya.........it has been studied for use by Universities since 2003 SARs........this is nothing new....

Most reports I read are that it is a pathway in for the Zinc to kill the virus..........aka STOP the body from producing so much that it kills you.........

By itself...........maybe it can be prevention......Doctors are using it......as prevention......DOCTORS are doing so.............Are these Doctors homeopathic.??????

yes it's preventative , in that we as 'host' can survive lower PH levels than most virus' , and no Dr in his/her right mind would maintain good standing in the AMA treating 'homeopathically' , lest they be ousted , and summarily dismissed as witch doctors Eagle

~S~
Tons of doctors are using it............are they all witch doctors...........

We've been using this for 70 plus years...........they studied it for SARs for years........it has shown promise as a means to get to the virus with the zinc.............

The Globalist are pushing other Meds......for money not success...............
 
Libs will do anything to make Trump look bad.
They are obsessed with it only because Trump talked about it.........and nothing more.

It's been around a while.............some like it some don't........I don't care......many Doctors have said it was their choice before Trump said anything...........others like other drugs........Nothing knew here.....except with the other drug we know the drug manufacturer buys politicians.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom