Who Is The Worst President Since WWII?

[protectionist]

REAGAN was the worst. Gave us millions of illegal aliens, who sprouted into millions more. Ran up huge deficits. Opposed the Briggs Inititive in California. worst of all, he changed the entire dsefinition of a conservative from favoring high taxes on the rich to support national security, to a small, weak govt with low taxes letting everythin just go to hell in a handbasket.

A whole generation of young people (under 40) are too young to know the difference. All they've ever seen is Reagan's negligent version, and it's all they know.

 

[healthmyths]

Creating a false premise is a logical fallacy.

GW Bush by Iraq alone, and LBJ by Vietnam, and Nixon by Watergate each make it impossible to designate Obama as the worst president since WWII. Nothing that has happened on Obama's watch that Obama can be held accountable for even close to those 3 major disasters.

Actually, I'm revealing you to be the village dunce.

This is how I win arguments. By default, when no poster who disagrees with me is able to offer a refutation based on evidence.

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

NONE of those Presidents EVER EVER EVER wished there were higher gas prices. Or wanted utilities would go bankrupt. Or wanted 1,300 companies that pay
$100 billion a year in taxes employing 400,000 people GO OUT OF BUSINESS!

NOT ONE President EVER EVER EVER signed an agreement as Obama did in 2012, granting temporary legal status to many young illegal immigrants,
ending the threat of deportation for at least two years.
"With the renewal of DACA, we act according to our values and code of this great nation," Johnson said.
"But the biggest task of comprehensive immigration reform is yet to come."


"Many Americans don't understand the power of word-of-mouth in Latin America; it's like gossip in a small American town times ten.
Word about anything, especially friends or family members going though the northbound migration or southbound deportation process,
spreads very quickly."

"As immigrant detention policies are slowly changing in places like south Texas in order to accommodate spiking numbers of border crossings and subsequent illegal immigrant apprehensions, word is spreading about these changes," she continued. "Now that DHS doesn't want to split up families and is releasing so many non-criminal illegal immigrants with only orders to return in 15 days for a court hearing, those bring released are calling home."

Ultimately, the sharp increase in illegal immigration, which has been called a "humanitarian crisis," will likely only get worse as word of detention practices spreads throughout Central America.

Instead of dealing with the root of the border crisis, Washington's solution has been to throw money at the problem for a quick fix.

AND...
NOT ONE President has EVER EVER EVER told Americans that he'd would have been very very very happy to see over 1.9 million children dead today!
AND NOT ONE President in American HISTORY EVER EVER EVER sold out the military by telling our enemies that our military methodically and systematically
every day of every year AIR RAIDING VILLAGES and Killing civilians!

So you tell me how many American lives were lost because the enemies LOVED to recruit more terrorists that used kids to blow up US troops handing out candy...
and you and Obama with your glee helped these terrorists EVERY EVERY EVERY time you bad mouthed the military.

 

[PoliticalChic]

REAGAN was the worst. Gave us millions of illegal aliens, who sprouted into millions more. Ran up huge deficits. Opposed the Briggs Inititive in California. worst of all, he changed the entire dsefinition of a conservative from favoring high taxes on the rich to support national security, to a small, weak govt with low taxes letting everythin just go to hell in a handbasket.

A whole generation of young people (under 40) are too young to know the difference. All they've ever seen is Reagan's negligent version, and it's all they know.

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[healthmyths]

Facts about Federal Deficits:
As a percent of receipts what President has had the highest DEFICIT?
SOURCE: Historical Tables | The White House download the xls file
"Table 1.1—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-): 1789–2019"
Starting with Nixon 1970...the greatest deficit as a percent of tax revenue... how bad was the spending compared to how much covered the spending!
Obama has had in the history from Nixon THE HIGHEST % of MORE MONEY GOING OUT then coming in!!!!

2009 Obama Receipts $2.104 trillion $1.412 Trillion Deficit or as percent of receipts -67%
2010 Obama total Federal TAX Receipts $2.162 Trillion.. $1.3 trillion Deficit meaning spent more then came in -59% of receipts deficit...
2011 Obama Receipts $2.3 trillion deficit $1.3 trillion -56% again Obama spend over 2 times what was coming in as receipts.
2012 Obama Receipts $2.4 trillion but spent $3.5 trillion meaning $1.1 trillion more spent then coming in -44%
1983 Reagan $600 billion receipts but spent $808 billion or -34% more then what came in..
1985 Reagan $734 billion came in, $946 billion went out or -28% more then came in..
1986 Reagan $769 billion in or -28% more going out
1984 Reagan $666 billion in -27% more going out
1992 Bush $1.1 trillion in but -26% more going out
1991 Bush $1.1 trillion in -25% more going out
1976 Carter $298 billion -24% more going out
2013 Obama $2.7 trillion coming in $679 billion more going out or -24%
1993 Clinton $1.1 trillion coming in $255 billion more going out or -22%

Now out of all the years of Presidents Nixon through Obama..
2000 Clinton had $2 trillion coming in and $1.7 trillion going out or a 11.6% more coming in then going out! Hurray!
1999 Clinton had 6% MORE coming in then going out
2001 Bush Had 6.4% more coming in then going out
1998 Clinton had 4.02% coming in then going out..

 

[PoliticalChic]

Facts about Federal Deficits:
As a percent of receipts what President has had the highest DEFICIT?
SOURCE: Historical Tables | The White House download the xls file
"Table 1.1—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-): 1789–2019"
Starting with Nixon 1970...the greatest deficit as a percent of tax revenue... how bad was the spending compared to how much covered the spending!
Obama has had in the history from Nixon THE HIGHEST % of MORE MONEY GOING OUT then coming in!!!!

2009 Obama Receipts $2.104 trillion $1.412 Trillion Deficit or as percent of receipts -67%
2010 Obama total Federal TAX Receipts $2.162 Trillion.. $1.3 trillion Deficit meaning spent more then came in -59% of receipts deficit...
2011 Obama Receipts $2.3 trillion deficit $1.3 trillion -56% again Obama spend over 2 times what was coming in as receipts.
2012 Obama Receipts $2.4 trillion but spent $3.5 trillion meaning $1.1 trillion more spent then coming in -44%
1983 Reagan $600 billion receipts but spent $808 billion or -34% more then what came in..
1985 Reagan $734 billion came in, $946 billion went out or -28% more then came in..
1986 Reagan $769 billion in or -28% more going out
1984 Reagan $666 billion in -27% more going out
1992 Bush $1.1 trillion in but -26% more going out
1991 Bush $1.1 trillion in -25% more going out
1976 Carter $298 billion -24% more going out
2013 Obama $2.7 trillion coming in $679 billion more going out or -24%
1993 Clinton $1.1 trillion coming in $255 billion more going out or -22%

Now out of all the years of Presidents Nixon through Obama..
2000 Clinton had $2 trillion coming in and $1.7 trillion going out or a 11.6% more coming in then going out! Hurray!
1999 Clinton had 6% MORE coming in then going out
2001 Bush Had 6.4% more coming in then going out
1998 Clinton had 4.02% coming in then going out..

Federal debt climbed 41% under Bill 'the rapist' Clinton

 

[protectionist]

REAGAN was the worst. Gave us millions of illegal aliens, who sprouted into millions more. Ran up huge deficits. Opposed the Briggs Inititive in California. worst of all, he changed the entire dsefinition of a conservative from favoring high taxes on the rich to support national security, to a small, weak govt with low taxes letting everythin just go to hell in a handbasket.

A whole generation of young people (under 40) are too young to know the difference. All they've ever seen is Reagan's negligent version, and it's all they know.

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

 

[Gadawg73]

REAGAN was the worst. Gave us millions of illegal aliens, who sprouted into millions more. Ran up huge deficits. Opposed the Briggs Inititive in California. worst of all, he changed the entire dsefinition of a conservative from favoring high taxes on the rich to support national security, to a small, weak govt with low taxes letting everythin just go to hell in a handbasket.

A whole generation of young people (under 40) are too young to know the difference. All they've ever seen is Reagan's negligent version, and it's all they know.

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

Reaganomics kept more money in the pockets of everyone.
Allowed citizens to keep more of the money THEY EARNED.
Sure thing he ran up a tab ending the Cold War.
The savings long term for what he did standing down the Evil Empire paid for itself in les than 10 years.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

Reaganomics kept more money in the pockets of everyone.
Allowed citizens to keep more of the money THEY EARNED.
Sure thing he ran up a tab ending the Cold War.
The savings long term for what he did standing down the Evil Empire paid for itself in les than 10 years.

What he said.

 

[protectionist]

Facts about Federal Deficits:
As a percent of receipts what President has had the highest DEFICIT?
Obama has had in the history from Nixon THE HIGHEST % of MORE MONEY GOING OUT then coming in!!!!

While the Republican House of Reps consistently vetoed any chance to raise taxes on the rich (which 3/4 of the American people support), preventing more money from coming in.

PS - I'm not an Obama ass-kisser, and I've bashed him as bad or worse than anyone in this forum. I just like to keep things in perspective, that's all.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...ma-administration-the-muslim-brotherhood.html

 

[NYcarbineer]

Actually, I'm revealing you to be the village dunce.

This is how I win arguments. By default, when no poster who disagrees with me is able to offer a refutation based on evidence.

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

You're an imbecile.

Let's leave it to readers to decide if you have or haven't been revealed as a lying cur.

How's that?

Let me repeat the question:

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

 

[Gadawg73]

I never thought he was.

One day you call Bill Clinton a rapist, the next you agree that it's accurate to consider him a better president than Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, and both of the Bushes.

What do you call him.....'star'?

Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:

I'd say he's been the target of many unproven accusations.

Ok, just go with the ones that came forward and offered their story publicly.
I'd say your team gave Clinton a free pass.
And lynched and crucified Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain with what, hello,
SAY IT SAY IT
ACCUSATIONS
And you and your team did what?
Remained silent on Clinton and ran wild on Cain and Thomas.
Double standard that is shameful.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

Reaganomics kept more money in the pockets of everyone.
Allowed citizens to keep more of the money THEY EARNED.
Sure thing he ran up a tab ending the Cold War.
The savings long term for what he did standing down the Evil Empire paid for itself in les than 10 years.

The savings from the Cold War? lol, except for a few paleo-nuts in one wing of the GOP, the mainstream Republican opinion is that we're not spending enough on defense,

and in addition to that they still ***** about military reductions that occurred after the so-called end to the Cold War.

Every Republican president or presidential candidate in the post Cold War era has run on spending more and more and more and more on defense.

 

[protectionist]

"Ran up huge deficits."

You really should stop relying on bumper-stickers for your education.

1. Under Reagan, the debt went up $1.7 trillion, from $900 billion to $2.6 trillion.
2. But….the national wealth went up $ 17 trillion
3. Reagan's near-trillion-dollar bulge in defense spending transformed the global balance of power in favor of capitalism. Spurring a stock-market, energy, venture-capital, real-estate and employment boom, the Reagan tax-rate cuts and other pro-enterprise policies added some $17 trillion to America's private-sector assets, dwarfing the trillion-dollar rise in public-sector deficits and creating 45 million net new jobs at rising wages and salaries.

George Gilder: The Real Reagan Lesson for Romney-Ryan - WSJ

Reaganomics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

Reaganomics kept more money in the pockets of everyone.
Allowed citizens to keep more of the money THEY EARNED.
Sure thing he ran up a tab ending the Cold War.
The savings long term for what he did standing down the Evil Empire paid for itself in les than 10 years.

1. The awful job growth (1.1%) of the Reagan/Bush (28-31% top tax) years did not get more money in the pockets of everyone.

2. They didn't earn ANYTHING when they were unemployed.

3. Reagan didn't do a thing to end the cold war. The Soviet Union crumbled from DECADES of overspending on military and space exploration. Reagan just (lucky for him) happened to be standing around when it happened, and opportunistically took the credit.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What do you call him.....'star'?

Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:

I'd say he's been the target of many unproven accusations.

Ok, just go with the ones that came forward and offered their story publicly.
I'd say your team gave Clinton a free pass.
And lynched and crucified Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain with what, hello,
SAY IT SAY IT
ACCUSATIONS
And you and your team did what?
Remained silent on Clinton and ran wild on Cain and Thomas.
Double standard that is shameful.

The double standard here is you calling out Clinton defenders while giving Thomas and Cain defenders a pass.

 

[protectionist]

This is how I win arguments. By default, when no poster who disagrees with me is able to offer a refutation based on evidence.

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

You're an imbecile.

Let's leave it to readers to decide if you have or haven't been revealed as a lying cur.

How's that?

Let me repeat the question:

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

I don't think he wants to do that (recalling Watergate, Vietnam, & "nuclear imminent threat")

 

[Gadawg73]

I know 2 retired secret service guys, 1 was already retired when Clinton was President and the other was assigned local White House and city only, no travel detail.
Monica Lewinsky is not the only intern Clinton had massaging his Johnson. There was another one also that willingly went along with it and her parent's found out about it and begged not for her to be drug into the mess.
And the security clearances that come with a change of Presidents is a massive file that contains thousands of police records, state investigations, state security analysis, in the case of Clinton Arkansas State Patrol files and security analysis and planning for Governor Clinton, FBI reports and transition security analysis, planning and strategy on the new President by Secret Service,
And the files were loaded with women that Clinton had propositioned, verbally forced himself on and half a dozen, including Paula Jones, that Clinton pulled his Johnson out of his pants, played with and waved it at them soliciting a blow job.
6 women do not tell the same story about a Governor waving his dick at them unless it is true.

 

[Redfish]

I'd say he's been the target of many unproven accusations.

Ok, just go with the ones that came forward and offered their story publicly.
I'd say your team gave Clinton a free pass.
And lynched and crucified Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain with what, hello,
SAY IT SAY IT
ACCUSATIONS
And you and your team did what?
Remained silent on Clinton and ran wild on Cain and Thomas.
Double standard that is shameful.

The double standard here is you calling out Clinton defenders while giving Thomas and Cain defenders a pass.

OMG, the double standard was so evident in the media that is stunk like a five day old roadkill.

The media ignored the Clinton accusers and made media stars out of the Cain and Thomas accusers.

Your disengenuousness is evident in every one of your posts.

 

[Redfish]

You're an imbecile.

Let's leave it to readers to decide if you have or haven't been revealed as a lying cur.

How's that?

Let me repeat the question:

Don't you even want to try to convince me that Obama has committed greater blunders or wrongs, more harmful acts as president than did Nixon, Bush, or Johnson?

I don't think he wants to do that (recalling Watergate, Vietnam, & "nuclear imminent threat")

watergate-------one party spying on the other party, no one killed or injured. Nixon lied about it and was forced from office

Vietnam-----Kennedy and Johnson's war that killed 58,000 americans for nothing. Nixon ended it.

Nuclear threat-------Russia had nukes, still does.

 

[Gadawg73]

1. There is no such thing as Reaganomics. It was nothing more than a SCAM to keep more money in the pockets of a greedy, very high-income worker (movie star), and you fall for it.

2. The Reagan tax cuts (combined with the Bush still low 31% top bracket tax) are congruent with some of the WORST job growth (1.1%) and GDP growth (2.6%) rates in America, since 1950. After Reagan set his low 28%, the economy tanked. You've been reading kool-aid books.

PS - does this look like a "bumper-sticker" to you ? No charge for the "education" tutoring.

Reaganomics kept more money in the pockets of everyone.
Allowed citizens to keep more of the money THEY EARNED.
Sure thing he ran up a tab ending the Cold War.
The savings long term for what he did standing down the Evil Empire paid for itself in les than 10 years.

The savings from the Cold War? lol, except for a few paleo-nuts in one wing of the GOP, the mainstream Republican opinion is that we're not spending enough on defense,

and in addition to that they still ***** about military reductions that occurred after the so-called end to the Cold War.

Every Republican president or presidential candidate in the post Cold War era has run on spending more and more and more and more on defense.

Let me appeal to your reason and common sense.
BOTH PARTIES, as illustrated recently by the M-1 Abrahams tank plant. The Army says NO, WE DO NOT WANT IT and Congress led by BOTH PARTIES approves funding for it.
This goes on with WEAPONS SYSTEMS, not troop strengths.
Democrats cut troop levels instead of offering WEAPONS SYSTEMS to be cut. Weapons systems are jobs and neither party will cut them.
Same with obsolete military bases, Warner Robbins base here in Georgia is one of many.
Republicans have offered more bases to be closed but Democrats, not all of them, refuse and MANY Republicans refuse also.
Republicans want to keep TROOP LEVELS UP and the Democrats always want to use that as their way of "cutting" spending on the military.
BOTH PARTIES are to blame on the weapons systems being funded the military often does not want and the failure to close obsolete military bases but it would be ONLY Democrats that always sacrifice troop levels as their favorite "cost cutting" of the military.
And that policy always does what when the threat level increases?
Costs us twice as much to RETRAIN NEW TROOPS.

 

[protectionist]

I know 2 retired secret service guys, 1 was already retired when Clinton was President and the other was assigned local White House and city only, no travel detail.
Monica Lewinsky is not the only intern Clinton had massaging his Johnson. There was another one also that willingly went along with it and her parent's found out about it and begged not for her to be drug into the mess.
And the security clearances that come with a change of Presidents is a massive file that contains thousands of police records, state investigations, state security analysis, in the case of Clinton Arkansas State Patrol files and security analysis and planning for Governor Clinton, FBI reports and transition security analysis, planning and strategy on the new President by Secret Service,
And the files were loaded with women that Clinton had propositioned, verbally forced himself on and half a dozen, including Paula Jones, that Clinton pulled his Johnson out of his pants, played with and waved it at them soliciting a blow job.
6 women do not tell the same story about a Governor waving his dick at them unless it is true.

Sounds like a meaningful issue > FOR HILLARY CLINTON.