Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My inability to what?I didn't ask you. Your inability to follow along answers that question in any case.
That statement makes no sense whatsoever.
That is Unkboys tactic. He likes to ask unrelated out of the bloue off the wall questions and then accuse YOU of being too stupid or too cowardly to allow him to derail the subject into something else entirely.
Doncha, Unkboy?
I would have to say JFK. Disastrous foreign policy that emboldened Khrushchev and never got a single major piece of legislation through congress. His chances for re-election were almost zero...after he got shot THEN everyone acted like he walked on water and was this fantastic president. In reality he was a disaster.
His chances for re-election were close to zero?
Against Goldwater?
Hard to tell who would have won that election. The campaign strategies would have been totally different. After JFK got shot he was canonized. The same people who were bitching about him a week before were suddenly talking like he was the greatest thing since the wheel. LBJ rode that popularity into the White House, which of course was a very smart political move, and it was difficult for the Republicans to make an attack since it could be twisted as showing disrespect to a murdered president.
Had JFK not been killed, there's a reasonable argument to be made that IF he was re-elected it certainly would not have been the crushing that the 1964 election was.
My inability to what?
That statement makes no sense whatsoever.
That is Unkboys tactic. He likes to ask unrelated out of the bloue off the wall questions and then accuse YOU of being too stupid or too cowardly to allow him to derail the subject into something else entirely.
Doncha, Unkboy?
Did you say "out of the bloue"? What the hell is that? Gonna try and call that a "typo" as well? You seriously need to work on your English.
Now then, I believe you made some claim about logic a while back? Are you ready to try and support your claim? Or are you too stupid and cowardly to stand by your own words? Your little disclaimer above doesn't change anything, despite what you were hoping.
My inability to what?
That statement makes no sense whatsoever.
That is Unkboys tactic. He likes to ask unrelated out of the bloue off the wall questions and then accuse YOU of being too stupid or too cowardly to allow him to derail the subject into something else entirely.
Doncha, Unkboy?
Did you say "out of the bloue"? What the hell is that? Gonna try and call that a "typo" as well? You seriously need to work on your English.
Now then, I believe you made some claim about logic a while back? Are you ready to try and support your claim? Or are you too stupid and cowardly to stand by your own words? Your little disclaimer above doesn't change anything, despite what you were hoping.
That is Unkboys tactic. He likes to ask unrelated out of the bloue off the wall questions and then accuse YOU of being too stupid or too cowardly to allow him to derail the subject into something else entirely.
Doncha, Unkboy?
Did you say "out of the bloue"? What the hell is that? Gonna try and call that a "typo" as well? You seriously need to work on your English.
Now then, I believe you made some claim about logic a while back? Are you ready to try and support your claim? Or are you too stupid and cowardly to stand by your own words? Your little disclaimer above doesn't change anything, despite what you were hoping.
I type fast and dont look to see if its all perfect enough to pass your typing tests. You want to focus on that instead of the content, feel free. Maybe someday youll get that stick out of your ass and realize you should check your FACTS before you worry about your spelling.
Your logic is indeed flawed. Its[sic] flawed because you cant[sic] see the forest for the trees, as demonstarted[sic] by your grammer[sic] nazi mentality.
if you actually had to back your shit up with links and facts?
Your logic is indeed flawed. Its[sic] flawed because you cant[sic] see the forest for the trees, as demonstarted[sic] by your grammer[sic] nazi mentality.
Can't you even try?
Spelling issues aside, what you describe above would not be a problem of logic even if it were true and you somehow managed to write about it in proper English.
if you actually had to back your shit up with links and facts?
I almost always do.
Was Daily still mayor of Chicago in '64?His chances for re-election were close to zero?
Against Goldwater?
Hard to tell who would have won that election. The campaign strategies would have been totally different. After JFK got shot he was canonized. The same people who were bitching about him a week before were suddenly talking like he was the greatest thing since the wheel. LBJ rode that popularity into the White House, which of course was a very smart political move, and it was difficult for the Republicans to make an attack since it could be twisted as showing disrespect to a murdered president.
Had JFK not been killed, there's a reasonable argument to be made that IF he was re-elected it certainly would not have been the crushing that the 1964 election was.
True. Kennedy beat Nixon by only a 100,000 or so votes in the popular vote. Chances are..had he survived and had he won, it would have been just as close.
if you actually had to back your shit up with links and facts?
I almost always do.
lIl ebielve ti ehwn I ese ti
Was Daily still mayor of Chicago in '64?Hard to tell who would have won that election. The campaign strategies would have been totally different. After JFK got shot he was canonized. The same people who were bitching about him a week before were suddenly talking like he was the greatest thing since the wheel. LBJ rode that popularity into the White House, which of course was a very smart political move, and it was difficult for the Republicans to make an attack since it could be twisted as showing disrespect to a murdered president.
Had JFK not been killed, there's a reasonable argument to be made that IF he was re-elected it certainly would not have been the crushing that the 1964 election was.
True. Kennedy beat Nixon by only a 100,000 or so votes in the popular vote. Chances are..had he survived and had he won, it would have been just as close.
Was Daily still mayor of Chicago in '64?True. Kennedy beat Nixon by only a 100,000 or so votes in the popular vote. Chances are..had he survived and had he won, it would have been just as close.
Even if you gave all 27 electorals from Illinois to Nixon. Kennedy still wins by 29 electtoral votes, so corruption in Chicago would have had very little impact at all.
Was Daily still mayor of Chicago in '64?
Even if you gave all 27 electorals from Illinois to Nixon. Kennedy still wins by 29 electtoral votes, so corruption in Chicago would have had very little impact at all.
yeah, stealing all those votes in texas put him over the top.
What president was more stupid than 'W'?
And I suppose you think you are smarter than President Bush?
Lincoln. He solidified the already over reaching authorities given to the federal govt when the constitution was ratified. He was a tyrant, plain and simple. And yet almost all of written history treats him as though he "saved America". The states should have been allowed to secede from the union without physical or economic violence.
After him, I'd go with FDR. For the same reasons. His programs were unconstitutional and he cheated to get them into law. They are a looming disaster today and yet, most main stream history holds this man up as some sort of savior of the country. He too was a tyrant.
Lincoln. He solidified the already over reaching authorities given to the federal govt when the constitution was ratified. He was a tyrant, plain and simple. And yet almost all of written history treats him as though he "saved America". The states should have been allowed to secede from the union without physical or economic violence.
After him, I'd go with FDR. For the same reasons. His programs were unconstitutional and he cheated to get them into law. They are a looming disaster today and yet, most main stream history holds this man up as some sort of savior of the country. He too was a tyrant.
Easily, the worst was Lincoln. And thanks to him, the government created by the Founders was destroyed and socialism was introduced into America.
