Who here thinks that running a real estate business is the same as running a country?

[danielpalos]

not the poor regarding social services due to any lack of Jobs Boom.

Well, in "fairness" trump has been able to find jobs for his entire family.....

We may need more of it; it is, a "right wing" form of Job Creation.

Kushner had to resign from 266 positions to avoid conflicts of interest

 

[Avatar4321]

Btw no one who supporter Barack Obama can complain about someone else's inexperience.

 

[Defiant1]

Your topic, as most of your topics, is not worthy of a reply.

.....and yet, like a dumb moth to flame......here you are a bit singed.....LOL

Hardly. I've been meaning to ask about your avatar for a while.

 

[hadit]

One could successfully argue that NOTHING is "like" running a country, and thus invalidate any president. Dumb premise.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The two idiots above, simply love to openly admit that they're idiots.........Answer the fucking question, morons or go play with your guns.....LOL

i will answer this like you would have nat if a righty had asked this......

 

[BluesLegend]

Your question is the poster child for liberal dishonesty, it has the rotted festering stench of lying lowlife scum liberal eww.

You could just as well stated...."I'm too dumb to answer a question and I just love fat guys...."
Now, THAT would have been more honest....LOL

I could link to your many other threads based on a lie, but that your threads are lies is pretty much implied anymore.

 

[BluesLegend]

Who here thinks you suck at math? Billionaire hello.

lol, billionaire minus the 23 million he had to give back to the people he screwed in his Trump University REAL ESTATE scam.

LOL Obama lost 20 times that on just one of his 'green' energy company failures. OH that's gonna leave a mark

 

[NYcarbineer]

Who here thinks you suck at math? Billionaire hello.

lol, billionaire minus the 23 million he had to give back to the people he screwed in his Trump University REAL ESTATE scam.

LOL Obama lost 20 times that on just one of his 'green' energy company failures. OH that's gonna leave a mark

Nice defense of Trump's criminal enterprise.

Let me ask you, why would a billionaire like Trump feel the need to screw ordinary Americans out of a few million bucks in a scam like Trump University?

What did he need that money for?

 

[kwc57]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Well, Trump is doing extremely well, exceeding expectations... so I guess you have been proven wrong.

Now, who thought it was a good idea to nominate a community organizer as the president? And what's that... the DNC is talking about nominating the Rock for the next run. The Rock!

Everyone expected that Trump would be a complete fuck-up and yes, he has exceeded those expectations. He's a totally useless fuck-up who is now on the edge of being impeached.

The man has accomplished the least of any President in his first 100 days of any President since FDR started the whole 100 day plan as a thing. Unless you count firings, going back on his promises, and ignoring the Constitution as accomplishments.





Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

You of course know why, but will never admit it. Congressional obstruction to appointments to prevent the administration from being able to function coupled with a complaint activist media working in concert with Republicans to take down a president because they are pissed they didn't win with their piss poor candidate. Too bad Trump isn't black, or he could shut you all up with charges of racism when you disagree with his policy like the left did for eight years.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's only taken Trump a hundred days to prove that the argument that his alleged business expertise would serve him well as president was bullshit.

 

[kwc57]

Pointing and laughing at the village idiot is a time honored tradition. Thank you for serving a purpose here

Unlike you, I find some worth in everybody......Yours is bumping up the original post......LOL

I find worth in every person too. Just not trolls like you.

 

[deltex1]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

Great point, Gnat. Far better to have a community organizer from a corrupt city.

 

[hadit]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

There is a tendency - especially among Conservatives - to belittle other peoples job skills. Just as they think that all factory workers just sit around putting nuts on bolts all day at $80 an hour, they also think that there's nothing more to the Presidency than giving speeches and having a bully pulpit.

Hey, all surgeons do is cut people open, slice off a tumor and stitch 'em back up...anybody could do that, right?

By the same token, liberals tend to believe they are the "smart" ones and belittle other peoples' job and life skills. Just as they think all southerners are 'bacca chewin', buck toothed, barefoot ignoramouses enamored with NASCAR and unable to put two sentences together, likewise they think being a president is nothing more than being able to read a good speech off a teleprompter and saying things to make the glitterari happy.

See how that works?

 

[Fang]

Successful business man with leadership experience > Community organizer with no experience

 

[Hum Dinger]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

There is a tendency - especially among Conservatives - to belittle other peoples job skills. Just as they think that all factory workers just sit around putting nuts on bolts all day at $80 an hour, they also think that there's nothing more to the Presidency than giving speeches and having a bully pulpit.

Hey, all surgeons do is cut people open, slice off a tumor and stitch 'em back up...anybody could do that, right?

By the same token, liberals tend to believe they are the "smart" ones and belittle other peoples' job and life skills. Just as they think all southerners are 'bacca chewin', buck toothed, barefoot ignoramouses enamored with NASCAR and unable to put two sentences together, likewise they think being a president is nothing more than being able to read a good speech off a teleprompter and saying things to make the glitterari happy.

See how that works?

Yes, I see how that works for you. You lie.

At least try to be original next time.

 

[hadit]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

There is a tendency - especially among Conservatives - to belittle other peoples job skills. Just as they think that all factory workers just sit around putting nuts on bolts all day at $80 an hour, they also think that there's nothing more to the Presidency than giving speeches and having a bully pulpit.

Hey, all surgeons do is cut people open, slice off a tumor and stitch 'em back up...anybody could do that, right?

By the same token, liberals tend to believe they are the "smart" ones and belittle other peoples' job and life skills. Just as they think all southerners are 'bacca chewin', buck toothed, barefoot ignoramouses enamored with NASCAR and unable to put two sentences together, likewise they think being a president is nothing more than being able to read a good speech off a teleprompter and saying things to make the glitterari happy.

See how that works?

Yes, I see how that works for you. You lie.

At least try to be original next time.

You have it half right. Both what I said and what I was responding to are wrong. They are extreme exaggerations. That is the point, but the difference is, I'm saying they are.

 

[Hum Dinger]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

There is a tendency - especially among Conservatives - to belittle other peoples job skills. Just as they think that all factory workers just sit around putting nuts on bolts all day at $80 an hour, they also think that there's nothing more to the Presidency than giving speeches and having a bully pulpit.

Hey, all surgeons do is cut people open, slice off a tumor and stitch 'em back up...anybody could do that, right?

By the same token, liberals tend to believe they are the "smart" ones and belittle other peoples' job and life skills. Just as they think all southerners are 'bacca chewin', buck toothed, barefoot ignoramouses enamored with NASCAR and unable to put two sentences together, likewise they think being a president is nothing more than being able to read a good speech off a teleprompter and saying things to make the glitterari happy.

See how that works?

Yes, I see how that works for you. You lie.

At least try to be original next time.

You have it half right. Both what I said and what I was responding to are wrong. They are extreme exaggerations. That is the point, but the difference is, I'm saying they are.

Nonsense. wingnuts believed that a real estate and construction tycoon is qualified to be president. Conservatives hate paying union workers and routinely belittle their skills - try getting into a debate about union wages with one sometime.

But everything you said about southerners is true...without a doubt...except you left out that they all have horny young daughters that wanna screw every salesman that comes to town....

 

[hadit]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

There is a tendency - especially among Conservatives - to belittle other peoples job skills. Just as they think that all factory workers just sit around putting nuts on bolts all day at $80 an hour, they also think that there's nothing more to the Presidency than giving speeches and having a bully pulpit.

Hey, all surgeons do is cut people open, slice off a tumor and stitch 'em back up...anybody could do that, right?

By the same token, liberals tend to believe they are the "smart" ones and belittle other peoples' job and life skills. Just as they think all southerners are 'bacca chewin', buck toothed, barefoot ignoramouses enamored with NASCAR and unable to put two sentences together, likewise they think being a president is nothing more than being able to read a good speech off a teleprompter and saying things to make the glitterari happy.

See how that works?

Yes, I see how that works for you. You lie.

At least try to be original next time.

You have it half right. Both what I said and what I was responding to are wrong. They are extreme exaggerations. That is the point, but the difference is, I'm saying they are.

Nonsense. wingnuts believed that a real estate and construction tycoon is qualified to be president. Conservatives hate paying union workers and routinely belittle their skills - try getting into a debate about union wages with one sometime.

But everything you said about southerners is true...without a doubt...except you left out that they all have horny young daughters that wanna screw every salesman that comes to town....

And you perfectly illustrated the vacuity of the left wing attempting to feel better about itself by denigrating others. Was that your intention?

 

[edward37]

In a sense, the thread's title/question is at the heart of the controversy in bashing the Trumpster.

Republicans (at least those that are ultra conservative and hated both Obama and Clinton) actually thought that it would be a good thing to have a businessman (an arrogant, childish, narcissistic and devious one) be president of the most powerful country on the planet.

As we are finding out almost on a daily basis, is that Trump "thinks" that (for example) twisting the arm of an intelligence head to drop investigations on him and his cronies, is the same as twisting the arm of another businessman in a boardroom setting.....

Obviously, businesses are NOT premised on democratic precepts; they are not premised on a check and balance system, and are not premised on the rule of concerns for the inclusive betterment of all citizens.

The Dump has twisted more than one intelligence agency guy Try 3... They told him FU,,,{my words}

 

[xotoxi]

You of course know why, but will never admit it. Congressional obstruction to appointments to prevent the administration from being able to function coupled with a complaint activist media working in concert with Republicans to take down a president because they are pissed they didn't win with their piss poor candidate. Too bad Trump isn't black, or he could shut you all up with charges of racism when you disagree with his policy like the left did for eight years.

How can there be Congressional obstruction to appointments when the opposing party is a minority in the House and Senate?

The only thing that is preventing the administration from being able to function is that it is a crappy administration lead by a worthless piece of shit.

And with regards to the media...how does the media prevent a President's administration from functioning? If there truly is nothing there, then the administration should be able to ignore the media and work on their policies.