Who do they think they are fooling by blocking the Gaetz report?

Still waiting for you to prove it.

Huh? There is a link, your link, that shows you it’s sportstic, then post 111 where you see some are released as statements not full reports…including one about this this case
 
Huh? There is a link, your link, that shows you it’s sportstic, then post 111 where you see some are released as statements not full reports…including one about this this case
What does sporadic have to do with proving that they don’t release reports?

You’ve been wrong a lot.
 
What does sporadic have to do with proving that they don’t release reports?

You’ve been wrong a lot.
I never said they don’t release reports. What are you talking about? It appears they do sometimes, and other times they simply release a statement like they did this time see post 111
 
Yes, they do. Most of them are right here.

I thank you for providing that link. I may use it to start a thread of its own.

I didn't see any reports in that link, but I only went to page 4. If they are on later pages, give me a hint.

I do see a lot of statements about ongoing "matters" (not investigations). It seems that everytime any named or anonymous source makes an accusation to the ethics committee, it becomes a matter, which is then endlessly "extended," waiting for whatever.

I will say it is bi-partisan, in that about the same number of Dems as Reps appear to have "matters" before the Ethics Committee.

Still not sure what the point is of all this outcry. It seems the committee is following its standard procedures.
 
I never said they don’t release reports. What are you talking about? It appears they do sometimes, and other times they simply release a statement like they did this time see post 111
Those statements are about releasing reports.

Moron.
 
Still not sure what the point is of all this outcry. It seems the committee is following its standard procedures.
You can’t seriously be that confused about why people are upset about this?
 
You can’t seriously be that confused about why people are upset about this?
I understand why "Democrats" not "people" are upset about Matt Gaetz being named AG.

"People" overwhelmingly put Trump in office, not to mention re-electing Matt Gaetz, so "people" seem fine with it.
 
I understand why "Democrats" not "people" are upset about Matt Gaetz being named AG.

"People" overwhelmingly put Trump in office, not to mention re-electing Matt Gaetz, so "people" seem fine with it.
That’s terrible logic. What percentage of “people” know who Matt Gaetz is? What percentage of people know his wingman was arrested and convicted of human trafficking?

If everyone is so fine with it, then there’s no reason not to release the report that Republicans, especially Gaetz, really don’t want to release.
 
That’s terrible logic. What percentage of “people” know who Matt Gaetz is? What percentage of people know his wingman was arrested and convicted of human trafficking?

If everyone is so fine with it, then there’s no reason not to release the report that Republicans, especially Gaetz, really don’t want to release.
Matt and his family were victims of a extortist scam. Victims have rights and don’t need the reports made public
 
Matt and his family were victims of a extortist scam. Victims have rights and don’t need the reports made public
What part of the constitution protects Gaetz from having the report released?
 
What part of that applies to Congressional hearings?
It applies to victims right. This entire case started as an extortion and blackmail attempt by two former fbi agents of the congressman

He’s entitled to reasonable privacy
 
Back
Top Bottom