LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Well being that youre an expert mind-reader, i think we should all agree with you that he meant the drunk club goers. After all that explaintion makes perfect sense.
I don't believe or take seriously anything that buffoon has to say.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Well being that youre an expert mind-reader, i think we should all agree with you that he meant the drunk club goers. After all that explaintion makes perfect sense.
You believe him?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Well being that youre an expert mind-reader, i think we should all agree with you that he meant the drunk club goers. After all that explaintion makes perfect sense.
You believe him?
Why wouldn't I?
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
It's as believable as Imam Obama saying he's a Christian.
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Then again... the whole idea of being in a club is not to worry about safety, but of what drink you're going to order when you get there.
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
It's as believable as Imam Obama saying he's a Christian.
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Then again... the whole idea of being in a club is not to worry about safety, but of what drink you're going to order when you get there.
There were two armed people in the club.
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Then again... the whole idea of being in a club is not to worry about safety, but of what drink you're going to order when you get there.
There were two armed people in the club.
Apparently that wasn't enough.
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Well being that youre an expert mind-reader, i think we should all agree with you that he meant the drunk club goers. After all that explaintion makes perfect sense.
You believe him?
Why wouldn't I?
Hmmmm. Because you have some sense and some ability to tell when someone is lying?
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Then again... the whole idea of being in a club is not to worry about safety, but of what drink you're going to order when you get there.
There were two armed people in the club.
Apparently that wasn't enough.
Or...maybe it was too many?
......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Well being that youre an expert mind-reader, i think we should all agree with you that he meant the drunk club goers. After all that explaintion makes perfect sense.
You believe him?
Why wouldn't I?
Hmmmm. Because you have some sense and some ability to tell when someone is lying?
Hmmm So its your contention that trump was advocating that wasted clubbers should be armed. One would have to be clynically insane to suggest something like that. Could it be that that interpretation is just a strawman argument??
Not me. The whole idea of making the argument for the second amendment means saying that the patrons should have been armed as well. But then, I recall people telling me such a thing wouldn't be wise, with all the bullets flying about. Out of all those people, three hundred of them, only one had to be armed. All it takes is one.......that Trump was referring only to guards and employees when he suggested that the people in the Pulse nightclub should have been armed?
Anyone?
Then again... the whole idea of being in a club is not to worry about safety, but of what drink you're going to order when you get there.
There were two armed people in the club.
Apparently that wasn't enough.
Or...maybe it was too many?
Hardly.