rylah
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 23,394
- 4,953
- 290
Ownership is more than possession.I know at the turn of the last century, Arabs were the majority land owners in this area.
Did Arabs become a majority by peaceful means?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ownership is more than possession.I know at the turn of the last century, Arabs were the majority land owners in this area.
Where did you get that number?
What's with the data dump? It doesn't take a genius to realize you can't move into an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there.Who Dispossessed the Palestinian Peasant?
The Palestinian peasant was indeed being dispossessed, but by his fellow-Arabs: the local sheikh and village elders, the Government tax-collector, the merchants and money-lenders; and, when he was a tenant-farmer (as was usually the case), by the absentee-owner. By the time the season’s crop had been distributed among all these, little if anything remained for him and his family, and new debts generally had to be incurred to pay off the old. Then the Bedouin came along and took their “cut”, or drove the hapless fellah off the land altogether.
This was the “normal” course of events in 19th-century Palestine. It was disrupted by the advent of the Jewish pioneering enterprise, which sounded the death-knell of this medieval feudal system. In this way the Jews played an objective revolutionary role. Small wonder that it aroused the ire and active opposition of the Arab sheikhs, absentee landowners, money-lenders and Bedouin bandits.
--------------
When considering Jewish land purchases and settlements, four factors should be borne in mind:
The following figures show land purchases by the three leading Jewish land-buying organizations and by individual Jews between 1880 and 1935.
- Most of the land purchases involved large tracts belonging to absentee owners. (Virtually all of the Jezreel Valley, for example, belonged in 1897 to only two persons: the eastern portion to the Turkish Sultan, and the western part to the richest banker in Syria, Sursuk “the Greek.”)
- Most of the land purchased had not been cultivated previously because it was swampy, rocky, sandy or, for some other reason, regarded as uncultivable. This is supported by the findings of the Peel Commission Report (p. 242): “The Arab charge that the Jews have obtained too large a proportion of good land cannot be maintained. Much of the land now carrying orange groves was sand dunes or swamp and uncultivated when it was purchased . . . there was at the time at least of the earlier sales little evidence that the owners possessed either the resources or training needed to develop the land.” (1937)
- While, for this reason, the early transactions did not involve unduly large sums of money, the price of land began to rise as Arab landowners took advantage of the growing demand for rural tracts. The resulting infusion of capital into the Palestinian economy had noticeable beneficial effects on the standard of living of all the inhabitants.
- The Jewish pioneers introduced new farming methods which improved the soil and crop cultivation and were soon emulated by Arab farmers.
(vide online)
From the above table it will be seen that the proportion of the land purchased from large (usually absentee) owners ranged from about 50 to 90 per cent.
“The total area of land in Jewish possession at the end of June 1947,” writes A. Granott in The Land System in Palestine (Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, 1952, p. 278), “amounted to 1,850,000 dunams, of this 181,100 dunams had been obtained through concessions from the Palestinian Government, and about 120,000 dunams had been acquired from Churches, from foreign companies, from the Government otherwise than by concessions, and so forth. It was estimated that 1,000,000 dunams and more, or 57 per cent, had been acquired from large Arab landowners, and if to this we add the lands acquired from the Government, Churches, and foreign companies, the percentage will amount to seventy-three. From the fellaheen there had been purchased about 500,000 dunams, or 27 per cent, of the total acquired. The result of Jewish land acquisitions, at least to a considerable part, was that properties which had been in the hands of large and medium owners were converted into holding of small peasants.”
(full article online )
Land Ownership in Palestine, 1880–1948 | survival
lessons.myjli.com
Thats the history of Arab / Islamic conquest and subjugation.What's with the data dump? It doesn't take a genius to realize you can't move into an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there.
The Jews did not take anything which was not theirs. The facts in the article hurt your narrative.What's with the data dump? It doesn't take a genius to realize you can't move into an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there.
Much of that was taken by force from Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun.Where did you get that number?
How much of it did they sell to Jews?
What I posted was what you pointed out to.Much of that was taken by force from Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun.
All righty then.Thats the history of Arab / Islamic conquest and subjugation.
What's with the data dump? It doesn't take a genius to realize you can't move into an area and automatically have more rights than the people already living there.
What are you talking about? You migrated into the area, then attacked the majority land owners.What I posted was what you pointed out to.
The turn of the century.
After 1920, Arabs were set up to riot against the Jews because of the possibility of a sovereign Jewish State.
I answered your post, do not change the subject.
Wrong. Palestinian-Arabs and Palestinian-Jews have been living there for over 2000 years. It was only when the Zionists showed up that things got violent.That's why 'Palestinian' is anyone
who passed for mere 2 years in the land?
Much of that was taken by force from Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun.
You are reading fables. Fables are not history.What are you talking about? You migrated into the area, then attacked the majority land owners.
Yeah. And I sent it to you a long time ago. You"re still doing the same schtik.Any backup? Or just a feeling?
You have no backup at all. Just fables against the jews.Yeah. And I sent it to you a long time ago. You"re still doing the same schtik.
Yeah. And I sent it to you a long time ago. You"re still doing the same schtik.
Well, the person who just moved into the area didn't own it!You are reading fables. Fables are not history.
You have no understanding of what Land Owners is. How many land owners there were. Not every person in the region 'Owned" the piece of land they lived on. Many left because of environment, many left because of the Bedouin.
Jews have always returned to their ancient homeland. At any time, any century. And stayed there. And there were no problems.
Jews continue to move back in the 19th century. At the end of that century many had returned. No one accused the Jews of Taking Land from their owners. Just as before, they BOUGHT land from the owners, usually swamp and sand dunes.
With the Mandate for Palestine, the Al Husseini clan turned against the Jewish right to have a sovereign state ON the ancient Jewish homeland, and started riots and expelling and killing Jews. All the Jews did was defend themselves from those attacks.
The Arabs attacked first. The Jews defended themselves, having the right to be there.
I've already posted the relevant facts. Your my way or the highway attitude, will not work.You have no backup at all. Just fables against the jews.
Try for real history and records.
Did the Bedouins who moved into the area and took over some lands, own it?Well, the person who just moved into the area didn't own it!