Who Are The Palestinians " III "

RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Annemarie Jacir, a Palestinian filmmaker, writer, and producer, associated with ""PHILISTINE FILMS""
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Every now an then, I just have to chuckle hard at the way the Palestinians present themselves.


Annemarie Jacir.png

PHILISTINE FILMS.png


Interview with Annemarie Jacir

(COMMENT)
.
Notice that the name of the Production Company is: ""PHILISTINE FILMS""

What does the word "Philistine" mean?



PHILISTINE.png


.That is not to say that the Palestinians are not really "philistines." For the most part, my opinion is that a vast majority of the general population of Palestinians in the disputed territories are "philistines." And they do associate themselves with the identity of "philistine."
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Attachments

  • PHILISTINE.webp
    PHILISTINE.webp
    2.7 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
The long reach of the forces confronting the Islamic terrorists is pretty evident.





Anti-Terror Operation in Nablus Is Further Proof of IDF Capabilities​


Yoni Ben Menachem
February 26, 2023
Anti-Terror Operation in Nablus Is Further Proof of IDF Capabilities

Eight Palestinian terrorists killed in Nablus on Feb. 22, 2023. (Abu Ali Express)
  • The IDF continues its counter-terrorism operations in Judea and Samaria and sends a warning to the terrorist organizations of its long reach.
  • However, the terrorist organizations are determined to bring about a new intifada soon, and the IDF may be tested to prevent it.
 
In another poll, 72% of pally children will be used as fodder to be thrown on the Islamic terrorist gee-had bonfire.




Poll: 72% of Palestinians support forming more armed groups in West Bank​


Poll: 72% of Palestinians support forming more armed groups in West Bank
 
Palestinians in Gaza Strip held today a vigil in solidarity with Palestinians in Nablus and in protest against Israeli crime in Nablus.

 
I'm afraid that the eternal Islamic terrorist welfare fraud of pally'dom will continue until the West decides to cease its funding




This is the same corrupt story seen everywhere, all over again. Power that in the name of many serves the few.

This current round of violence starts with Palestinian corruption. There are many versions to corruption, this one is about the indefinite postponement of the Palestinian elections by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. In the weeks following his decision, Hamas searched for ways to prove its impact on the Palestinian landscape. Hamas is a start-up, a company aimed to preserve political power, which will give its members money and influence over their surroundings. So, this round of violence is not about the occupation and it is not about religious freedom. It is about how a corrupt leadership is doing all it can to preserve its power and influence.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Michigan's 12th Congressional District (Parts of Detroit and Dearborn)
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, she sends mixed signals.


(COMMENT)
.
Opposing a General Population like the Arab Palestinians that voted for, financially support, lend material assistance, and following the policy that "Jihad and the Armed Resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine," is NOT really "racism."
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).
SOURCE: FBI


(A). involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;​
(B). appear to be intended—
(i). to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;​
(ii). to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or​
(iii). to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;​
  1. ‘Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade’
  2. ‘Al Aqsa e.V.’
  1. ‘Hamas’, including ‘Hamas Izz al Din al Qassem’
  2. ‘Palestine Liberation Front’ – ‘PLF’
  3. ‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ – ‘PIJ’
  4. ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine’ – ‘PFLP’
  5. ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command’ (a.k.a. ‘PFLP – General Command’)
SOURCE: Official Journal of the European Union
SOURCE: 18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R
 
C'mon man. This isn't shocking. Teenagers are a disposable commodity in pally'dom. Grooming teens to fulfill their role as splodeydopes in the service of making money for the Islamic terrorist enclaves is their duty.



Shocking: A Palestinian mother instructs her son how to become a Martyr

Itamar Marcus | Feb 28, 2023
When a 16-year-old Palestinian boy told his mother “I'll come back to you as a Martyr,” she could have discouraged him with several possible responses. However, she did not tell him she loves him and would rather he lived to adulthood and raised a family. She did not tell him NOT to seek suicide as a “Martyr.” What she did, alternatively, was give him instructions on how to assure Allah accepted him as a Martyr.



This is the shocking account that the mother of 16-year-old Muntasir Al-Shawa told PA TV:
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Michigan's 12th Congressional District (Parts of Detroit and Dearborn)
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, she sends mixed signals.



(COMMENT)
.
Opposing a General Population like the Arab Palestinians that voted for, financially support, lend material assistance, and following the policy that "Jihad and the Armed Resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine," is NOT really "racism."
International terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups who are inspired by, or associated with, designated foreign terrorist organizations or nations (state-sponsored).
SOURCE: FBI


(A). involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;​
(B). appear to be intended—​
(i). to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;​
(ii). to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or​
(iii). to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;​

  1. ‘Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade’
  2. ‘Al Aqsa e.V.’
  3. ‘Hamas’, including ‘Hamas Izz al Din al Qassem’
  4. ‘Palestine Liberation Front’ – ‘PLF’
  5. ‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ – ‘PIJ’
  6. ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine’ – ‘PFLP’
  7. ‘Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command’ (a.k.a. ‘PFLP – General Command’)
SOURCE: Official Journal of the European Union
SOURCE: 18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R
A). involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws, blah, blah, blah.
The Palestinians have the legal right to resist occupation by all means necessary including armed struggle.
 
The Palestinians have the legal right to resist occupation by all means necessary including armed struggle.
As the Arabs-Moslems you call pally hold no land as sovereign, there is no "occupation", only lands occupied by the Arabs-Moslems.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Michigan's 12th Congressional District (Parts of Detroit and Dearborn)
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Again, you are spreading misinformation.

The Palestinians have the legal right to resist occupation by all means necessary including armed struggle.
(COMMENT)
.
I do not care what toilet paper General Assembly Resolution you quote from. A General Assembly. A General Assembly Resolution is NOT binding and does NOT have the strength of law.

I suggest you read Applicable Article (68) from the Geneva Convention very carefully.


Article 68 • Fourth Geneva Convention.png

Any Arab Palestinian who commits an offense that is solely intended to harm the Israeli occupying forces or administration is subject to criminal prosecution.

And the call for increased attacks on the Israelis and the Rocket and Mortar Attacks are a direct violation of:

Article 51 - Protection of the civilian population

1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules, which are additional to other applicable rules of international law, shall be observed in all circumstances.​
2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.​
3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.​
4. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:​
(a) those which are not directed at a specific military objective;​
(b) those which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or​
(c) those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.​

I recommend you fact-check your work before you make such sweeping position statements. Not fact-checking and getting it wrong only further reduces your credibility.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
As the Arabs-Moslems you call pally hold no land as sovereign, there is no "occupation", only lands occupied by the Arabs-Moslems.
If you look at real hostory, all of Palestine is occupied.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Michigan's 12th Congressional District (Parts of Detroit and Dearborn)
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Again, you are spreading misinformation.


(COMMENT)
.
I do not care what toilet paper General Assembly Resolution you quote from. A General Assembly. A General Assembly Resolution is NOT binding and does NOT have the strength of law.

I suggest you read Applicable Article (68) from the Geneva Convention very carefully.
Any Arab Palestinian who commits an offense that is solely intended to harm the Israeli occupying forces or administration is subject to criminal prosecution.

And the call for increased attacks on the Israelis and the Rocket and Mortar Attacks are a direct violation of:

Article 51 - Protection of the civilian population

1. The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy general protection against dangers arising from military operations. To give effect to this protection, the following rules, which are additional to other applicable rules of international law, shall be observed in all circumstances.​
2. The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.​
3. Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.​
4. Indiscriminate attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:​
(a) those which are not directed at a specific military objective;​
(b) those which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed at a specific military objective; or​
(c) those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.​

I recommend you fact-check your work before you make such sweeping position statements. Not fact-checking and getting it wrong only further reduces your credibility.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
You need to read IVGC more closely. Israeli settlers are not protected persons, i.e. civilians.

Your whole shtick is based on false premise.
 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians " III "
SUBTOPIC: Confusion
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You need to read IVGC more closely. Israeli settlers are not protected persons, i.e. civilians.

Your whole shtick is based on false premise.
(COMMENT)
.
I did not realize I had to explain every little thing...

◈ The "Protected Persons" refers to the Arab Palestinians.​
◈ Article 51 of Protocol 1 covers the civilians in both Israel and the Special Provisions over Area "C"​
You are trying to through off the observation. No matter how you slice it, the Israeli Settlers ARE civilians protected under the Geneva Convention Protocol. The protocol does not say anything about your hair splitting.

(Para 3, A/PV.2268. 14 October 1974), agree to ANNEX III Protocol Concerning Civil Affairs • ARTICLE IV Special Provisions concerning Area "C" • which assigned Israel full civil and security control over Area “C"..
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom