Whitehouse ***ADMITS*** no evidence of foreign interference in the election process !!!!!!!!!

[TheOldSchool]

This what the man you fellate , Obama, is accusing the Russians of doing:


CNN: What's Obama's take on all of this?

Obama says he is determined to take action against Russia -- and says Putin is "well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it."
"I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," he told NPR.

Again, you do not what you are talking about or you are a disinformation agent

.

The White House did not refute that princess. The intelligence report came out YESTERDAY. Your article is from OVER A MONTH AGO.

BULLSHIT


during a secret briefing for congressional leaders, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voiced doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according to officials present


The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability."

.

WTF IS THE DEAL WITH YOU AND OBSOLETE ARTICLES THAT ARE OVER A MONTH OLD AND OFF TOPIC?

 

[tyroneweaver]

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS ******* IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

NaziCons don't care about sources and methods being exposed.

Not to worry sugartits, help is on the way.
Within a couple of days they'll be a post to refute everything you spew.

 

[Contumacious]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

If anyone is claiming that the Russians compromised our electoral infrastructure, they are few and far between.

That's not what this is about.
.

What is this about

tell me, clearly and succinctly

.

 

[Contumacious]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

What exactly are they blaming them for? There hasn't been an ounce of proof just magical dragon, Alice in wonderland leaps.

I need to remember that Trump voters are profoundly uninformed, and don't know anything about the issue at hand when they decide to butt into the conversation.

As shown during the election process

we are not gullible and take shit from nobody

.

 

[Slade3200]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

What exactly are they blaming them for? There hasn't been an ounce of proof just magical dragon, Alice in wonderland leaps.

I need to remember that Trump voters are profoundly uninformed, and don't know anything about the issue at hand when they decide to butt into the conversation.

As shown during the election process

we are not gullible and take shit from nobody

.

That seems to be exactly what you are and exactly what you do...

 

[TheOldSchool]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

What exactly are they blaming them for? There hasn't been an ounce of proof just magical dragon, Alice in wonderland leaps.

I need to remember that Trump voters are profoundly uninformed, and don't know anything about the issue at hand when they decide to butt into the conversation.

As shown during the election process

we are not gullible and take shit from nobody

.

Actually you showed the complete opposite. But if you can't even understand the topic of your own OP, how can I expect you to understand anything at all...

 

[Contumacious]

BULLSHIT.

SHOW ME WHERE CLAPPER, THE WHITE OR SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE THAT DISTINCTION CLEAR.


.


.

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the **** you . stop toeing the party line

BECAUSE THAT WASN'T IN THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT RETARD. IT'S A COMPLETELY SEPARATE MATTER THAT PEOPLE STOPPED CARING ABOUT WEEKS AGO. REMEMBER THE RECOUNTS GENIUS?

This what the man you fellate , Obama, is accusing the Russians of doing:


CNN: What's Obama's take on all of this?

Obama says he is determined to take action against Russia -- and says Putin is "well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it."
"I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," he told NPR.

Again, you do not what you are talking about or you are a disinformation agent

.

Hacking private information from a political party, strategically leaking information to hurt a candidate, online trolling, spreading fake news, etc etc. that is the claim... not changing votes

There is NO EVIDENCE of hacking

The NSA can identify hackers and hackees , they haven't identify anyone.

Everything is based on self-serving "conclusions"


.

 

[Contumacious]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

Amen! The OP is just spreading more fake news bullshit.

Wishful thinking

.

 

[Contumacious]

Exactly.

The CIA has been politicized:

"Indeed, that the CIA is not only suddenly involved, but suddenly at the forefront, may well reflect President-elect Trump’s stated policy intentions being far removed from those that the CIA has endorsed, and might be done with an eye toward undermining Trump’s position in those upcoming policy battles."


.

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS ******* IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

REPEATING

There is NO EVIDENCE

JUST "CONCLUSIONS"

They can "conclude" so can I

.

 

[Contumacious]

Exactly? Did you not read anything I wrote?

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS ******* IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

NaziCons don't care about sources and methods being exposed.

Speak for yourself

You are the #1 disinformation agent

.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If Russia tried to undermine confidence in the US electoral system, how is that any different than people asking electors not to vote for Trump?

How did Russia know the DNC is corrupt? Did Russia make the DNC **** over Bernie Sanders and make Donna Brazile give debate questions to the DNC? How did Russia make the DNC corrupt?

If a sports team steals plays from another team then releases that information to another team to help them defeat the "hacked" team do you think that's a fair game? Do you think the team that stole the plays should be punished ?

Your analogy is terrible.

Try it again like this:

If the Pittsburgh Steelers hacked the New England Patriots computer system and uncover cheating by the New England Patriots, and it helps the Cowboys win the Super Bowl, who should be punished?

That's a fine analogy... the patriots and the steelers should be punished. The flaw in your analogy is you are only talking about cheating, it would be more accurate to say that the steelers revealed the the Patriots playbook, and strategies to help the cowboys win.

Podestas emails and DNC communications weren't cheating, they were private strategic communications that got leaked out and spun to help by the Trump squad.

All fair game in a campaign but I'd like to see how things would have played out if the RNC was also hacked and all email communications exposed.

Let's talk about CNN giving the DNC debate questions and the DNC intentionally sabotaging Bernie Sanders. That's analogous to cheating. That's the Patriots cheating to win. That's the DNC cheating to win.

Sanction the Steelers and the Patriots. The Cowboys did nothing wrong.

 

[Mac1958]

U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

------________

But suddenly they changed their minds, an afterthought, in order to discredit the Trump administration

Me thinks motherfucking Clapper is LYING AGAIN

Americans DO NOT LET the butthurts interfere with the Trump Administration.

LET'S STAND OUR GROUND !!!!!!!!!!!
.

If anyone is claiming that the Russians compromised our electoral infrastructure, they are few and far between.

That's not what this is about.
.

What is this about

tell me, clearly and succinctly

.

A successful email phishing operation targeted at the DNC, primarily.

Stolen emails, not hacked voting machines.
.

 

[Slade3200]

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the **** you . stop toeing the party line

BECAUSE THAT WASN'T IN THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT RETARD. IT'S A COMPLETELY SEPARATE MATTER THAT PEOPLE STOPPED CARING ABOUT WEEKS AGO. REMEMBER THE RECOUNTS GENIUS?

This what the man you fellate , Obama, is accusing the Russians of doing:


CNN: What's Obama's take on all of this?

Obama says he is determined to take action against Russia -- and says Putin is "well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it."
"I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," he told NPR.

Again, you do not what you are talking about or you are a disinformation agent

.

Hacking private information from a political party, strategically leaking information to hurt a candidate, online trolling, spreading fake news, etc etc. that is the claim... not changing votes

There is NO EVIDENCE of hacking

The NSA can identify hackers and hackees , they haven't identify anyone.

Everything is based on self-serving "conclusions"


.

You obviously haven't read or haven't understood the reports and conclusions of those that have viewed the actual evidence. You are ignorant like we all are to the facts yet you think you know more than you really do.

It's a matter of who you trust. You obviously don't trust our intelligence professionals. That's sad.

 

[Contumacious]

The WHITEHOUSE ADMITS THAT

"The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

ANYTHING ELSE IS ******* IRRELEVANT


.

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

Hell yes they should. Just as they should have released the proof of weapons of mass destruction under W. See where this is going?

So to be clear, if the CIA has a man inside the Russian gov or if they have tapped into their communications you think it's a smart thing to release that information to the public? Do you have any worries about compromising those assets?

Repeatinng

The "intelligence report" is a "consensus view" of 17 agencies

it is not based on hard evidence

WHY HASN'T THE WHITEHOUSE MADE PUBLIC THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT " AS DEMANDED BY SENATE DEMOCRATS?!?!?!??!?

.

 

[Slade3200]

If Russia tried to undermine confidence in the US electoral system, how is that any different than people asking electors not to vote for Trump?

How did Russia know the DNC is corrupt? Did Russia make the DNC **** over Bernie Sanders and make Donna Brazile give debate questions to the DNC? How did Russia make the DNC corrupt?

If a sports team steals plays from another team then releases that information to another team to help them defeat the "hacked" team do you think that's a fair game? Do you think the team that stole the plays should be punished ?

Your analogy is terrible.

Try it again like this:

If the Pittsburgh Steelers hacked the New England Patriots computer system and uncover cheating by the New England Patriots, and it helps the Cowboys win the Super Bowl, who should be punished?

That's a fine analogy... the patriots and the steelers should be punished. The flaw in your analogy is you are only talking about cheating, it would be more accurate to say that the steelers revealed the the Patriots playbook, and strategies to help the cowboys win.

Podestas emails and DNC communications weren't cheating, they were private strategic communications that got leaked out and spun to help by the Trump squad.

All fair game in a campaign but I'd like to see how things would have played out if the RNC was also hacked and all email communications exposed.

Let's talk about CNN giving the DNC debate questions and the DNC intentionally sabotaging Bernie Sanders. That's analogous to cheating. That's the Patriots cheating to win. That's the DNC cheating to win.

Sanction the Steelers and the Patriots. The Cowboys did nothing wrong.

I agree, I have no problem with penalties to CNN or the DNC for cheating. I believe people were fired.

I also dont see anybody going after the cowboys (Trump). The conversation is about punishing the Steelers (Russians). Y'all seem to be either dismissing the steelers involvement or making a case that they did nothing wrong.

 

[Iceweasel]

explaining the psychological impact of the constant barrage of the email horseshit right up to the FBI investigation Friday before the election to Right Wing DUMBASSES is tantamount to explaining nano technology in a classroom full of earthworms.

EXCEPT ...the lefties were prancing around in victory claiming there was nothing substantive in the emails and were waiting for the bombshell that never came.

The left dismissed the emails and the right didn't need them to know how corrupt the Dems are. Anyone paying attention to the primaries saw Bernie winning states but Hillary getting the delegates. And somehow the emails were the problem?

Libs can't see their flaws but that's why they are libs.

 

[Contumacious]

So the election machines weren't hacked. This is not a revelation, nor is it what our intelligence agencies are unanimously blaming Russia for.

What exactly are they blaming them for? There hasn't been an ounce of proof just magical dragon, Alice in wonderland leaps.

I need to remember that Trump voters are profoundly uninformed, and don't know anything about the issue at hand when they decide to butt into the conversation.

I don't swallow fake news and regurgitate the propaganda.

Then you would be the first rube on the forum that doesn't. Which is unlikely.

You are NOT going to pull the wool over our eyes


.

 

[Contumacious]

BULLSHIT.

SHOW ME WHERE CLAPPER, THE WHITE OR SENATE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE THAT DISTINCTION CLEAR.


.


.

WHAT YOU RETARD? GET BACK TO ME WHEN THE ADMINISTRATION REFUTES THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED BY OUR INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.

The "intelligence report" cum swallower?

Anyone can use a word processor to manufacture an "intelligence report".

Why didn't the whitehouse rely on the "intelligence report" before declaring

" we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective."

Shut the **** you . stop toeing the party line

What are you implying? Sounds like you're saying that the intelligence report was manufactured for political reasons and not based on real intelligence... is that what you think?

THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT" WAS MANUFACTURED

Show me where they say that they have HARD EVIDENCE OF CYBERATTACKS

The "intelligence report" is based on "conclusions"

The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.

con·clu·sion
kənˈklo͞oZHən/
noun

1. 2.
   a judgment or decision reached by reasoning.
   "each research group came to a similar conclusion"
   synonyms: deduction, inference, interpretation, reasoning; More

INSTEAD OF POSTING A MONTH AND A HALF OLD ARTICLE THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ALLEGATIONS AGAINST RUSSIA, WHY DON'T YOU READ YESTERDAY'S REPORT YOURSELF YOU DUMB ******* RUBE:

Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections

Because I don't like FICTION


.

 

[Slade3200]

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Where the evidence?

Do you honestly think they should release the evidence to the public if it compromises their intelligence assets? Do you understand or respect to reasons for classification?

Hell yes they should. Just as they should have released the proof of weapons of mass destruction under W. See where this is going?

So to be clear, if the CIA has a man inside the Russian gov or if they have tapped into their communications you think it's a smart thing to release that information to the public? Do you have any worries about compromising those assets?

Repeatinng

The "intelligence report" is a "consensus view" of 17 agencies

it is not based on hard evidence

WHY HASN'T THE WHITEHOUSE MADE PUBLIC THE "INTELLIGENCE REPORT " AS DEMANDED BY SENATE DEMOCRATS?!?!?!??!?

.

Of course it's based on hard evidence you dumbshit. The evidence is what they draw their conclusions from. The evidence is strong enough to give the 3 agencies extremely high confidence in their findings.

 

[Iceweasel]

You are completely missing the point. Nobody is trying to take Trumps win away... it's over, he is president. Though there is a political spin on the left that implies a negative narrative towards the support Russia showed Trump, the entire point of the intelligence report is aimed at malicious interference by Russia. Trump is playing politics trying to dismiss these actions but that is entirely because of his ego, his attitude is not making America safer, it is leaving us open to continued attacks by Russia, which will eventually bite Trump in the Ass.

If Clinton or Obama were acting like Trump after these actions by Russia, y'all would be throwing out terms like feckless and weak... don't be a hypocrite, it's ok to be critical of your goldenboy. He is far from perfect.

Yes, the left is trying to take Trump's win away. They would throw him out of office or lock him up if they could. You are full of shit.

Instead of posturing non stop, post the evidence (not OPINION) that Russia hacked the DNC's servers and the email revelations of Democrat corruption swayed the election outcome.

Everything else you say is an attempt to avoid it.