"White Supremacists Greatest And Most Lethal Threat."

[LOIE]

After promising that Iran would never get nuclear weapons, Obama guaranteed them nukes.

Politifact:

No, the Clintons and Obama didn’t give nukes and uranium to North Korea, Iran and Russia

"It’s obvious who the real traitors are," begins a Dec. 29 Facebook post featuring photos of former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Donald Trump. It claims that Bill Clinton "gave nukes to North Korea," Obama "gave nukes to Iran" and Hillary Clinton "gave uranium to Russia."

The text over the photo of a satisfied-looking Trump says: "Who betrayed America?"

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.

 

[LOIE]

In that case, you don't know what "context" means.

I quoted his exact words, and what came before and after.

And.....the context is that Democrats passed a bill in 1965 designed to do exactly what Obama told them to do.

Encouraging illegal entry didn't prove to be a fast enough destruction of America for the Democrats......so underBiden....they simply opened the border.

Did you know that by the end of Biden's term America will be 20% illegal immigrants?


Texas lieutenant governor warns 20% of people in US will be ...
https://video.foxnews.com › ...
Texas lieutenant governor warns 20% of people in US will be illegal immigrants by end of Biden's first term. Apr. 11, 2022 - 4:05 - Texas sheriffs Brad Coe ...




20% of American population will be here illegally by the end of ...
https://www.yahoo.com › video › 20-american-populati...
2 days ago — 20% of American population will be here illegally by the end of Biden's ... in US will be illegal immigrants by end of Biden's first term.

But......you are an imbecile.

Again, you get your info from sources you believe in and in which I do not believe at all.

 

[miketx]

I watched the entire interview this info came from. This sentence, pushed by fox news and others is totally taken out of context and much of his words were eliminated. He was telling American born citizens that they, when they vote, are the voice for those who are not able to because of their lack of citizenship. Typical misrepresentation of the facts.

And that you simply believe whatever these guys tell you I might call a bit imbecilic.

Defines the left to a T. ^^^

 

[PoliticalChic]

Politifact:

No, the Clintons and Obama didn’t give nukes and uranium to North Korea, Iran and Russia

"It’s obvious who the real traitors are," begins a Dec. 29 Facebook post featuring photos of former presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Donald Trump. It claims that Bill Clinton "gave nukes to North Korea," Obama "gave nukes to Iran" and Hillary Clinton "gave uranium to Russia."

The text over the photo of a satisfied-looking Trump says: "Who betrayed America?"

This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.

Did I mention that you are an imbecile????

It bears repeating.

You're an imbecile.

On a national level, most people now know PolitiFact is nothing but another Obama-shilling mainstream media joke -- an entity so in the tank for the White House it ruled as mostly true that "Barack Obama has lowest spending record of any recent president:"​

sing inflation-adjusted dollars, Obama had the second-lowest increase -- in fact, he actually presided over a decrease once inflation is taken into account.

Yes, you read that correctly. According to PolitiFact, when indexed for inflation, Obama reduced spending.

PolitiFact's motto appears to be: The bigger the lie the more people will believe it. Hm. Sounds familiar. But how else can you palace guard for a failed president?

But PolitiFact isn't just a national cancer on all of us. This reprehensible outfit also "fact-checks" in a number of individual states, including the crucial swing states of Florida, Wisconsin, Ohio, New Hampshire, and Virginia.

Unfortunately, my lack of superpowers makes it impossible for me to monitor the left-wing propaganda PolitiFact is surely spewing in each individual state. Thankfully, though, the Republican Party of Virginia has had enough and late yesterday hit back at PolitiFact Virginia with both barrels:

For quite some time we've had growing concerns regarding PolitiFact Virginia's approach towards Republicans in general, and in specific, "separating fact from fiction" against Republican candidates, officials and committees.

On February 16th of this year, the Republican Party of Virginia had a meeting with the Editor and Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch regarding the paper's PolitiFact Virginia unit. In late April - two months later - we had a subsequent conference call to follow up on our original meeting.

Since the original meeting - nearly five months ago - PolitiFact Virginia has meted-out 36 rulings, not including recent "Ad Watch" articles. Of those rulings, 26 targeted Republican candidates, elected officials, our State Party, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Crossroads. At the same time, PolitiFact Virginia handed down only 10 rulings on Democrats and one 3rd party organization.

That might not sound like both barrels, but included in the press release is this 87-page document which goes into great detail to refute a number of PolitiFact's lies, some of them nearly as absurd as PolitiFact's mostly true ruling that "Obama has the lowest spending record of any recent president."

This pushback is crucial and hopefully this is just the beginning. Whether it's on a national or local level, Republicans must treat the media as what it truly is: an adversary.

There is no downside anymore in pushing back and going on offense against the corrupt media. New Media is here to stay and not fighting back against the likes of PolitiFact is no different than not fighting back against the DNC.



VA Pushes Back Against PolitiFact, Shows Other States the Way







This bias is evident in:

1) The targeting of Republican political figures for lopsidedly disproportionate

PolitiFact examination;2

2) The showering of Republican politicians with suspiciously negative determinations;

and

3) The basing of these supposed “factual” determinations on highly subjective analysis

and even opinion masquerading as “fact checks.

http://library.constantcontact.com/...nia+--+Political+Bias+--+Final+--+7-10-12.pdf





Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

The fact that, as the Lichter study shows, "A majority of Democratic statements (54 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely true, compared to only 18 percent of Republican statements," probably has more to do with how the statements were picked and the subjective bias of the fact checker involved than anything remotely empirical. Likewise, the fact that "a majority of Republican statements (52 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely false, compared to only 24 percent of Democratic statements" probably has more to do with spinning stories than it does with evaluating statements.

There is a "truth gap" in Washington, but it doesn't exist along the lines the fact checkers would have you think. It was Obama who said you could keep the health care you had if you liked it, even if Obamacare became law. It was Obama who said the Citizens United decision would open the floodgates of foreign money into U.S. campaigns. It was Obama who said Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video. It was Obama's IRS that denied conservative political groups had been singled out for special scrutiny. And it was Obama who promised that taxes would not go up for any American making less than $250,000 per year.

All of these statements and plenty more are demonstrably false,

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans

PolitiFact.com is a project operated by the Tampa Bay Times, in which reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets "fact-check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists and interest groups".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolitiFact.com



The St. PetersburgTampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a traditionally liberal paper. We note that PolitiFact's stories appear to damage Republicans far more often than Democrats despite the fact that PF tends to choose about as many stories dealing with Republicans as for Democrats. If the selection process was blind then either proportions should be approximately even or else the party with worse ratings should receive more ratings overall according to what PolitiFact lists as its selection criteria. Plus our independent research helps confirm the hypothesis. About PolitiFact Bias/FAQ



"The Tampa Bay Times, which produces the PolitFact Truth-o-Meter, has not endorsed a single Republican candidate this century for any of the three most important positions on the Florida election ballot. Accordingly, the Times scores a “Pants on Fire” for its lack of objectivity, according to an extensive analysis by Media Trackers Florida.

Since 2000, the Times has issued 10 endorsements in elections for U.S. President, U.S. Senate, and Florida Governor. Nine of the 10 endorsements went to Democrats, with the sole exception being theTimes’ endorsement of Democrat-leaning Independent Charlie Crist in the 2010 U.S. Senate contest." http://mediatrackers.org/florida/20...-times-scores-pants-on-fire-for-partisan-bias

PolitiFact’s liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)​

PolitiFact's liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)

PolitiFact this week judged statements about the Arizona immigration law and Climategate. Guess what side these fact-checkers chose? If you guessed “Progressive/Democrat,” you’re a w...

www.redstate.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Again, you get your info from sources you believe in and in which I do not believe at all.

That's because you are an imbecile.


Can you provide the three or four books that have informed your geopolitical outlook?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Defines the left to a T. ^^^

Sad but true.


Unless we can pry the schools from them, as earlier American pried their slaves from them.....America is lost.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I watched the entire interview this info came from. This sentence, pushed by fox news and others is totally taken out of context and much of his words were eliminated. He was telling American born citizens that they, when they vote, are the voice for those who are not able to because of their lack of citizenship. Typical misrepresentation of the facts.

And that you simply believe whatever these guys tell you I might call a bit imbecilic.

Barry actually said that.

 

[LOIE]

That's because you are an imbecile.


Can you provide the three or four books that have informed your geopolitical outlook?

No, because that will just give you fodder to blast them, criticize them and try to debunk them. They are my choices because I have the freedom to read and believe whatever I choose. Unlike in some states where they are actually banning books and limiting choices.

Your party doesn't just want to take schools back, they want to take the country back - WAY back to when white people, who claimed to be building a Christian country, made all the rules, decided to whom they applied and how they would be enforced. Even if it meant lynching, burning, killing, bombing, and terrorizing American people.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Neither "whites", nor "The Right" (regular, alt., extreme) have a monopoly here on this topic.
EXCERPT:

May 17, 2022

Guess how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically​

By D. Parker​

The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported?​

If the alleged Buffalo killer's "manifesto" is authentic, he was deep into communist ideology and now is an authoritarian leftist. Why is this being kept under wraps?

The teenager accused of murdering ten people last Saturday in Buffalo, N.Y. also allegedly posted a 180-page "manifesto" online that the national media are selectively exploiting, leaving out key facts. Why?

Please note that we're going to use the term chumbucket instead of the mass murderer's name, following in the tradition of the Zelman Partisans. We should all be aware of the phenomenon of media contagion, whereby wall-to-wall coverage, cynically exploited by the anti-liberty left for political purposes to suppress civil rights, also encourages further attacks.

Even though it makes perfect sense to avoid propagating the images and writings of these suspects so they don't encourage further attacks, it is entirely incorrect to cherry-pick the data to score cynical political points, while purposefully excluding other key facts that interrupt the nation's socialist media's chosen false narrative.

You can search all you want for the story, and there will be a myriad of versions that mention the alleged mass murderer and the "manifesto." Most of these will reference the latter as a news source, assuming that it is authentic. But they never actually provide factual backing to their reportage. Many have posted an image of the first pages. Others had additional images of other pages to collaborate the following quotes that were found that upend the national media's disinformation narrative (leaving in any typos):



Did you catch that? The chumbucket first admits to being "deep into communist ideology" at 12, then being in the "authoritarian left category." Have you seen that fact published anywhere except in the pro-freedom media? Have you seen that quote published anywhere?
...

Guess how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically

The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported? If the alleged Buffalo killer's

www.americanthinker.com

Payton Gendron was deeply influenced by Tucker Carlson. He repeated Tucker many times in his manifesto, concerning White Replacement Theory.

 

[LOIE]

Payton Gendron was deeply influenced by Tucker Carlson. He repeated Tucker many times in his manifesto, concerning White Replacement Theory.

A large number of white people have pretty much always been afraid that blacks would outnumber them and that's why they have tried so hard over the years to make life so difficult for them and to keep them down. I was at a discussion group on Saturday and someone told us the story about a black woman who had been sterilized against her will. She had been told she needed surgery for some pains she was having but was never told what they actually did. Years later when she and her husband tried to have a baby, a doctor told her that she never would because she had been sterilized.

I just read that the exact thing happened to Fannie Lou Hammer, who was rushed to the hospital with stomach pains. When she recovered from surgery, she learned that the white doctor had sterilized her against her will. It was a common experience among black women and it was dubbed, "Mississippi appendectomy." This was a practice forced on black women to keep them from having children. I've read it is likely that doctors performed several hundred thousand of these procedures without the consent of the patient.

I did not know about this, just like so many other atrocities that have been hidden, or kept out of history books.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

A large number of white people have pretty much always been afraid that blacks would outnumber them and that's why they have tried so hard over the years to make life so difficult for them and to keep them down. I was at a discussion group on Saturday and someone told us the story about a black woman who had been sterilized against her will. She had been told she needed surgery for some pains she was having but was never told what they actually did. Years later when she and her husband tried to have a baby, a doctor told her that she never would because she had been sterilized.

I just read that the exact thing happened to Fannie Lou Hammer, who was rushed to the hospital with stomach pains. When she recovered from surgery, she learned that the white doctor had sterilized her against her will. It was a common experience among black women and it was dubbed, "Mississippi appendectomy." This was a practice forced on black women to keep them from having children. I've read it is likely that doctors performed several hundred thousand of these procedures without the consent of the patient.

I did not know about this, just like so many other atrocities that have been hidden, or kept out of history books.

That is horrible. This is why The 1619 Project and CRT needs to be taught to our children. They need to know all the cruel, inhumane things that have been done to African-Americans and other POC.

 

[Stryder50]

Payton Gendron was deeply influenced by Tucker Carlson. He repeated Tucker many times in his manifesto, concerning White Replacement Theory.

Link/URL ... ???

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Link/URL ... ???

It's on YouTube. Go look it up.

 

[IM2]

Did I mention that you are an imbecile????

It bears repeating.

You're an imbecile.

On a national level, most people now know PolitiFact is nothing but another Obama-shilling mainstream media joke -- an entity so in the tank for the White House it ruled as mostly true that "Barack Obama has lowest spending record of any recent president:"​

sing inflation-adjusted dollars, Obama had the second-lowest increase -- in fact, he actually presided over a decrease once inflation is taken into account.

Yes, you read that correctly. According to PolitiFact, when indexed for inflation, Obama reduced spending.

PolitiFact's motto appears to be: The bigger the lie the more people will believe it. Hm. Sounds familiar. But how else can you palace guard for a failed president?

But PolitiFact isn't just a national cancer on all of us. This reprehensible outfit also "fact-checks" in a number of individual states, including the crucial swing states of Florida, Wisconsin, Ohio, New Hampshire, and Virginia.

Unfortunately, my lack of superpowers makes it impossible for me to monitor the left-wing propaganda PolitiFact is surely spewing in each individual state. Thankfully, though, the Republican Party of Virginia has had enough and late yesterday hit back at PolitiFact Virginia with both barrels:

For quite some time we've had growing concerns regarding PolitiFact Virginia's approach towards Republicans in general, and in specific, "separating fact from fiction" against Republican candidates, officials and committees.

On February 16th of this year, the Republican Party of Virginia had a meeting with the Editor and Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch regarding the paper's PolitiFact Virginia unit. In late April - two months later - we had a subsequent conference call to follow up on our original meeting.

Since the original meeting - nearly five months ago - PolitiFact Virginia has meted-out 36 rulings, not including recent "Ad Watch" articles. Of those rulings, 26 targeted Republican candidates, elected officials, our State Party, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and American Crossroads. At the same time, PolitiFact Virginia handed down only 10 rulings on Democrats and one 3rd party organization.

That might not sound like both barrels, but included in the press release is this 87-page document which goes into great detail to refute a number of PolitiFact's lies, some of them nearly as absurd as PolitiFact's mostly true ruling that "Obama has the lowest spending record of any recent president."

This pushback is crucial and hopefully this is just the beginning. Whether it's on a national or local level, Republicans must treat the media as what it truly is: an adversary.

There is no downside anymore in pushing back and going on offense against the corrupt media. New Media is here to stay and not fighting back against the likes of PolitiFact is no different than not fighting back against the DNC.



VA Pushes Back Against PolitiFact, Shows Other States the Way







This bias is evident in:

1) The targeting of Republican political figures for lopsidedly disproportionate

PolitiFact examination;2

2) The showering of Republican politicians with suspiciously negative determinations;

and

3) The basing of these supposed “factual” determinations on highly subjective analysis

and even opinion masquerading as “fact checks.

http://library.constantcontact.com/...nia+--+Political+Bias+--+Final+--+7-10-12.pdf





Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

The fact that, as the Lichter study shows, "A majority of Democratic statements (54 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely true, compared to only 18 percent of Republican statements," probably has more to do with how the statements were picked and the subjective bias of the fact checker involved than anything remotely empirical. Likewise, the fact that "a majority of Republican statements (52 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely false, compared to only 24 percent of Democratic statements" probably has more to do with spinning stories than it does with evaluating statements.

There is a "truth gap" in Washington, but it doesn't exist along the lines the fact checkers would have you think. It was Obama who said you could keep the health care you had if you liked it, even if Obamacare became law. It was Obama who said the Citizens United decision would open the floodgates of foreign money into U.S. campaigns. It was Obama who said Benghazi happened because of a YouTube video. It was Obama's IRS that denied conservative political groups had been singled out for special scrutiny. And it was Obama who promised that taxes would not go up for any American making less than $250,000 per year.

All of these statements and plenty more are demonstrably false,

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans

PolitiFact.com is a project operated by the Tampa Bay Times, in which reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets "fact-check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists and interest groups".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PolitiFact.com



The St. PetersburgTampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a traditionally liberal paper. We note that PolitiFact's stories appear to damage Republicans far more often than Democrats despite the fact that PF tends to choose about as many stories dealing with Republicans as for Democrats. If the selection process was blind then either proportions should be approximately even or else the party with worse ratings should receive more ratings overall according to what PolitiFact lists as its selection criteria. Plus our independent research helps confirm the hypothesis. About PolitiFact Bias/FAQ



"The Tampa Bay Times, which produces the PolitFact Truth-o-Meter, has not endorsed a single Republican candidate this century for any of the three most important positions on the Florida election ballot. Accordingly, the Times scores a “Pants on Fire” for its lack of objectivity, according to an extensive analysis by Media Trackers Florida.

Since 2000, the Times has issued 10 endorsements in elections for U.S. President, U.S. Senate, and Florida Governor. Nine of the 10 endorsements went to Democrats, with the sole exception being theTimes’ endorsement of Democrat-leaning Independent Charlie Crist in the 2010 U.S. Senate contest." http://mediatrackers.org/florida/20...-times-scores-pants-on-fire-for-partisan-bias

PolitiFact’s liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)​

PolitiFact's liberal bias, yet again (Arizona law; Climategate)

PolitiFact this week judged statements about the Arizona immigration law and Climategate. Guess what side these fact-checkers chose? If you guessed “Progressive/Democrat,” you’re a w...

www.redstate.com

Another mountain of bullshit.

 

[IM2]

No, because that will just give you fodder to blast them, criticize them and try to debunk them. They are my choices because I have the freedom to read and believe whatever I choose. Unlike in some states where they are actually banning books and limiting choices.

Your party doesn't just want to take schools back, they want to take the country back - WAY back to when white people, who claimed to be building a Christian country, made all the rules, decided to whom they applied and how they would be enforced. Even if it meant lynching, burning, killing, bombing, and terrorizing American people.

And poli chic will be excluded and returned back to Korea as the whites she chums up to Reestablishes the no Asian policy.

 

[Stryder50]

It's on YouTube. Go look it up.

Or you could "look up" post #9 of this thread, which I'll repost here since you appear to be "disabled";
...
May 17, 2022

Guess how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically​

By D. Parker​

The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported?​

If the alleged Buffalo killer's "manifesto" is authentic, he was deep into communist ideology and now is an authoritarian leftist. Why is this being kept under wraps?
The teenager accused of murdering ten people last Saturday in Buffalo, N.Y. also allegedly posted a 180-page "manifesto" online that the national media are selectively exploiting, leaving out key facts. Why?
Please note that we're going to use the term chumbucket instead of the mass murderer's name, following in the tradition of the Zelman Partisans. We should all be aware of the phenomenon of media contagion, whereby wall-to-wall coverage, cynically exploited by the anti-liberty left for political purposes to suppress civil rights, also encourages further attacks.

Even though it makes perfect sense to avoid propagating the images and writings of these suspects so they don't encourage further attacks, it is entirely incorrect to cherry-pick the data to score cynical political points, while purposefully excluding other key facts that interrupt the nation's socialist media's chosen false narrative.
You can search all you want for the story, and there will be a myriad of versions that mention the alleged mass murderer and the "manifesto." Most of these will reference the latter as a news source, assuming that it is authentic. But they never actually provide factual backing to their reportage. Many have posted an image of the first pages. Others had additional images of other pages to collaborate the following quotes that were found that upend the national media's disinformation narrative (leaving in any typos):

When I was 12 I was deep into communist ideology, talk to anyone from my old high school and ask about me and you will hear that. From age 15 to 18 however, I consistently moved farther to the right. On the political compass I fall in the mildmoderate authoritarian left category, and I would prefer to be called a populist.

Did you catch that? The chumbucket first admits to being "deep into communist ideology" at 12, then being in the "authoritarian left category." Have you seen that fact published anywhere except in the pro-freedom media? Have you seen that quote published anywhere?
...

Guess how the Buffalo shooter identified himself politically ​

The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn't this being reported? If the alleged Buffalo killer's

www.americanthinker.com

 

[Stryder50]

That is horrible. This is why The 1619 Project and CRT needs to be taught to our children. They need to know all the cruel, inhumane things that have been done to African-Americans and other POC.

You mean they need to be indoctrinated with your Leftist-Socialist/communist propaganda bullshit and fantasies.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, because that will just give you fodder to blast them, criticize them and try to debunk them. They are my choices because I have the freedom to read and believe whatever I choose. Unlike in some states where they are actually banning books and limiting choices.

Your party doesn't just want to take schools back, they want to take the country back - WAY back to when white people, who claimed to be building a Christian country, made all the rules, decided to whom they applied and how they would be enforced. Even if it meant lynching, burning, killing, bombing, and terrorizing American people.

It was a joke. I'm simply mocking you again.

You are the typical Democrat, unaware of these:

Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.



"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter

 

[PoliticalChic]

Payton Gendron was deeply influenced by Tucker Carlson. He repeated Tucker many times in his manifesto, concerning White Replacement Theory.

Let's review the term, just to prove how wrong you are.

This is what the Democrats claim Replacement Theory is:
The catch phrase used by the demented shooter in Buffalo is "replEacement theory," and here is NPR's definition:
"...the "Great Replacement" is a conspiracy theory that states that non-white individuals are being brought into the United States and other Western countries to "replace" white voters to achieve a political agenda. It is often touted by anti-immigration groups, white supremacists and others, according to the National Immigration Forum." (NPR)


Now......I don't watch Fox News or Tucker Carlson, but if that maniac killed black people based on the above.....

...then it is the Democrats who are responsible for the slaughter.




This is what Replacement theory is:
"Republican objections to the Democrat plan would be exactly the same if Democrats were importing blonde-haired blue-eyed yodeling Scandinavians to shift the US electorate to the Left. In medieval scholastic terminology, what Republicans object to is only per accidens, not per se (accidentally, not essentially) about race. Republicans object to the importation of a political persuasion, not a specific race, into the country in order to achieve political power. It is only the Democrat’s explicit racist plan to use “persons of color” to shift the demographics to secure their hold on power that brings race into the issue!"

The Latest Hoax By Democrats And Their Media... Great Replacement Theory​

Democrats claim that they are not using mass immigration to shift the demographics of America while simultaneously doing exactly that.

thebluestateconservative.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

A large number of white people have pretty much always been afraid that blacks would outnumber them and that's why they have tried so hard over the years to make life so difficult for them and to keep them down. I was at a discussion group on Saturday and someone told us the story about a black woman who had been sterilized against her will. She had been told she needed surgery for some pains she was having but was never told what they actually did. Years later when she and her husband tried to have a baby, a doctor told her that she never would because she had been sterilized.

I just read that the exact thing happened to Fannie Lou Hammer, who was rushed to the hospital with stomach pains. When she recovered from surgery, she learned that the white doctor had sterilized her against her will. It was a common experience among black women and it was dubbed, "Mississippi appendectomy." This was a practice forced on black women to keep them from having children. I've read it is likely that doctors performed several hundred thousand of these procedures without the consent of the patient.

I did not know about this, just like so many other atrocities that have been hidden, or kept out of history books.

Spoken like a true Democrat simpleton!

Pat on the head for you!