White House announces more aggressive review of Smithsonian museums

We as a society should be celebrating our long standing consensus on equality for racial minorities.

Yet, leftards like yourself ...
Piss off, troll.
You, as a leftard ...
Piss off, troll.
But, you can't do it. Becuase that division and that hurting of America, EMPOWERS, the left.
Piss off, troll.
You need that, hate and conflict to get the political power you need to advance your lefty agenda.
Piss off, troll.
 
Piss off, troll.

Piss off, troll.

Piss off, troll.

Piss off, troll.


All you had to do, was celebrate our generations long consensus on equality for racial minorities, and you would have thus undermined my argument, with your own action.

BUt, you can't.

Because your side, is deeply invested in hating America and tearing it down.


That is part of your agenda.


As you just demonstrated repeatedly.
 
Piss off, troll.

And you still can't celebrate how great it is that America has had a bi-partisan consensus for equality for racial minorities, since the mid 60s.


That btw, has been my entire life. ALL of the shit talk about whites keeping blacks down, was over well before my time.


Is that not true? Is that not a great thing for and about America?
 
No I wasn’t alive

He cared about ending slavery he literally help create an entire party that was about ending slavery
No fool he didn't care about ending slavery, he cated about saving the Union. You read his words on the matter, but like Trump your dumbass is in denial.
 
No fool he didn't care about ending slavery, he cated about saving the Union. You read his words on the matter, but like Trump your dumbass is in denial.
Um he literally help create the GOP which was created as the party to abolish slavery

You are clueless if African American history
 
It does matter, becasue you should be honest about how great America is for you and yours.
That would be you, it has been great for white folks.
Here you are admitting that leftards like yourself, push the idea that America is evil. YOu hate America.
Sorry ass clown, you can't put your cheap racist labels on me. I hate the evil that black folks have had to endure in America.
Not a lie. I don't know why you served, but it clearly was not because you love America.
That's all you do is lie? Have you served?
Except, you're the racist, not me. So, you are just a shit talker. Though I fully believe you hate me.
I do hate racist like you.
Nope. We see young people taught in schools by libtards like yourself, who grow up to be ashamed of America.
You see folks teaching young folks history and not his-story.
Your denial is not fooling anyone.
Neither are your racist lies.
 
Um he literally help create the GOP which was created as the party to abolish slavery

You are clueless if African American history
If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.
Abraham Lincoln
 
If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.
Abraham Lincoln
That doesn’t change the fact he founded the GOP which was a party formed to abolish slavery
 
As you can't or perhaps best explained as you refuse to provide evidence of ideological bias in historical matters by museums.
Take Civil war history, there is tons of proof that event is biased against democrats, yet democrats of now don't accept that bias.
Please document your baseless claim. Some states tried to reject the U.S. Constitution, and attacked and killed U.S. soldiers and sailors in an attempt to perpetuate and spread slavery. That's indispuable.


It's best to be wary of ideological zealots who, demonstrably, impose their political biases on higher education, science, and medicine.
 
Last edited:
No fool he didn't care about ending slavery, he cated about saving the Union. You read his words on the matter, but like Trump your dumbass is in denial.


Politicians words contradict each other.

What to do?

Judge him by his actions.

You are the fool.
 
That would be you, it has been great for white folks.

Sorry ass clown, you can't put your cheap racist labels on me. I hate the evil that black folks have had to endure in America.

That's all you do is lie? Have you served?

I do hate racist like you.

You see folks teaching young folks history and not his-story.

Neither are your racist lies.


Other than your magic word, you said nothing.

YOu hate America, and that's teh point. People like you should have no input into... anything relevant.
 
15th post
Please document your baseless claim. Some states tried to reject the U.S. Constitution, and attacked and killed U.S. soldiers and sailors in an attempt to perpetuate and spread slavery. That's indispuable.


It's best to be wary of ideological zealots who, demonstrably, impose their political biases on higher education, science, and medicine.
Thanks for proving my point. Slavery was then legal. The war was not about slavery. The confederates had not killed any soldiers. Lincoln invaded VA. He got first blood.
 
Thanks for proving my point. Slavery was then legal. The war was not about slavery. The confederates had not killed any soldiers. Lincoln invaded VA. He got first blood.
Your lies have been discredited, but if you need to cling to them that is what you will do, Objective scholars would not allow that shit to be substituted for the documented truth.

Ordinances of Secession - civilwarcauses.org

The Confederate Constitution explicitly supported slavery

The attack on Fort Sumter began on April 12, 1861, marking the official start of the American Civil War. Confederate artillery, commanded by General Pierre Gustave T. Beauregard, opened fire on the fort, which was held by Union forces under Major Robert Anderson. The bombardment lasted for about three days, during which over 3,000 shells were fired at the fort
 
Last edited:
Your lies have been discredited, but if you need to cling to them that is what you will do, Objective scholars would not allow that shit to be substituted for the documented truth.
Actually, I went to some of the major civil war sites and over time figured it out. Oh my books about that war are very t rue and provide proof the South was right. War is not started by a mere shots at a stout fort. Kindly supply proof by Lincoln it was due to the lousy shooting at an occupied fort where nobody was injured.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom