Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And how new homes are, supposedly, illegal?I condemn the violence of the Palestinian attackers and I condemn Israel for using their tragic deaths as the basis for approving constuction of hundreds of new homes for an illegal settlement.
And how new homes are, supposedly, illegal?I condemn the violence of the Palestinian attackers and I condemn Israel for using their tragic deaths as the basis for approving constuction of hundreds of new homes for an illegal settlement.
And how new homes are, supposedly, illegal?I condemn the violence of the Palestinian attackers and I condemn Israel for using their tragic deaths as the basis for approving constuction of hundreds of new homes for an illegal settlement.
International law. All West Bank settlement are illegal. This particular (illegal) one was established in 1984.
The first point addressed by the resolution is the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Some people read two four two as though it ends here and the case for requiring a total Israeli withdrawal from the territories is proven. On the contrary, this clause does no such thing, because the reference clearly applies only to an offensive war.
The first point addressed by the resolution is the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Some people read two four two as though it ends here and the case for requiring a total Israeli withdrawal from the territories is proven. On the contrary, this clause does no such thing, because the reference clearly applies only to an offensive war.
Interesting. Israel has never been in a defensive war with Palestine. How could it have won Palestinian land?
There are no Palestinians. There was not any Palestinian land to win or lose. The only chance the Arabians had to gain a country was tossed away when they refused the partition for their squatter brethren who had no country. The British Mandate of the partition had been dissolved. It was simply owner-less land.
The Jews did not refuse their partition.
Since then Egypt, Jordan, Syria and other Arabian countries have attacked Israel and when they did, the land that was not theirs or Israels and which was still no more than open hosted land was taken as buffer areas and now are being settled upon.
November of 1967 PF.
That was when 242 was drafted. There is not one word in the entire resolution of 242 that even uses the word Palestine or Palestinian. They call the Arabs who are no genetically different than any of the other Lebanese, Jordanian and Syrian Arabs 'refugees'.
That's why there never will be peace. Arabs want it all. They are not content with 99.7% of the middle east.
They must have Israel as well. They come from all over to become "Palestinians". There are now over twenty thousand Shia "Palestinians" in Gaza. They are in their twenties, thirties and forties and they claim direct lineage to other "Palestinans" who are not Shia.
Yeah. OK.
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
Courts of Palestine? When there is no Palestine?
The exact number of countries recognizing the State of Palestine is unknown,
There you go. From the trolls own mouth. Because there is no state of Palestine.The first point addressed by the resolution is the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Some people read two four two as though it ends here and the case for requiring a total Israeli withdrawal from the territories is proven. On the contrary, this clause does no such thing, because the reference clearly applies only to an offensive war.
Interesting. Israel has never been in a defensive war with Palestine. How could it have won Palestinian land?
There are no Palestinians. There was not any Palestinian land to win or lose. The only chance the Arabians had to gain a country was tossed away when they refused the partition for their squatter brethren who had no country. The British Mandate of the partition had been dissolved. It was simply owner-less land.
The Jews did not refuse their partition.
Since then Egypt, Jordan, Syria and other Arabian countries have attacked Israel and when they did, the land that was not theirs or Israels and which was still no more than open hosted land was taken as buffer areas and now are being settled upon.
November of 1967 PF.
That was when 242 was drafted. There is not one word in the entire resolution of 242 that even uses the word Palestine or Palestinian. They call the Arabs who are no genetically different than any of the other Lebanese, Jordanian and Syrian Arabs 'refugees'.
That's why there never will be peace. Arabs want it all. They are not content with 99.7% of the middle east.
They must have Israel as well. They come from all over to become "Palestinians". There are now over twenty thousand Shia "Palestinians" in Gaza. They are in their twenties, thirties and forties and they claim direct lineage to other "Palestinans" who are not Shia.
Yeah. OK.
That's why there never will be peace. Arabs want it all. They are not content with 99.7% of the middle east.
That's why there never will be peace. Arabs want it all. They are not content with 99.7% of the middle east.
Smokescreen issue. Irrelevant.
There was no requirement for approval. It was open land. Israel is recreated and a country.
That's why there never will be peace. Arabs want it all. They are not content with 99.7% of the middle east.
Smokescreen issue. Irrelevant.
Not at all. My opinion is as relevant as yours here.
Now irrelevant to you?
Yeah.
The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.
The exact number of countries recognizing the State of Palestine is unknown,
The first point addressed by the resolution is the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." Some people read two four two as though it ends here and the case for requiring a total Israeli withdrawal from the territories is proven. On the contrary, this clause does no such thing, because the reference clearly applies only to an offensive war.
Interesting. Israel has never been in a defensive war with Palestine. How could it have won Palestinian land?