Looks like you are trying to play clever games with semantics to imply these people were only charged with trespassing misdemeanor. Pretty dishonest isn’t it? Since the charges many are charged are much more serious. But not surprising from you these days.
Meanwhile…
A federal grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment yesterday, which was unsealed today, charging 11 defendants with seditious conspiracy and other charges for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, which disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress...
www.justice.gov
Sedition and insurrection are closely linked, like slander and libel. Would it make you happier if we refer to these terrorists as seditionists?
CSIS security experts define acts of sedition and insurrection and evaluate the seriousness of both charges.
www.csis.org
Generally, sedition is conduct or speech that incites individuals to violently rebel against the authority of the government. Insurrection includes the actual acts of violence and rebellion. In a monarchy, sedition might refer to actions instigating the removal of a king or queen. In a constitutional democracy, sedition and insurrection refer to inciting or participating in rebellion against the constitutionally established government, its processes and institutions, or the rule of law. In other words, in the United States’ democracy, violently overthrowing the government or its institutions is overthrowing the Constitution itself. One cannot commit sedition or insurrection to “overthrow a government” while still claiming to uphold and defend the Constitution. The U.S. government, the rule of law, and the Constitution are inextricably linked, and violent attacks on any of the three are not protected actions.
Here is the LEGAL definition from USLegal:
"Insurrection Law and Legal Definition
Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
The following is a case law defining Insurrection:
Insurrection means “a violent uprising by a group or movement acting for the specific purpose of overthrowing the constituted government and seizing its powers. An insurrection occurs where a movement acts to overthrow the constituted government and to take possession of its inherent powers.” [Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1392-1393 (E.D. Pa. 1995)]"
LINK
It was obviously
Rioting/Mob Violence and with videos showing a lot of people walking around peacefully and without arms.
Only a few were violent and most of them were still unarmed as the FBI are on record saying so.
===
The FBI themselves said about 95% of the people were not armed and did simple rioting as I posted that to you before which you are willing to ignore not only that there are still ZERO Sedition/Insurrection charges posted, don't YOU bother to read your own link?
The FBI says about the remaining 5%
"FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said."
and,
"But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as "seditious conspiracy" to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs.
Senior officials had discussed filing such charges in the weeks after the attack, the sources said.
Prosecutors have also not brought any charges alleging that any individual or group played a central role in organizing or leading the riot. Law-enforcement sources told Reuters no such charges appeared to be pending."
and,
"In public comments last month to the Democratic-led congressional committee formed to investigate the violence, police officers injured in the mayhem
urged lawmakers to determine whether Trump helped instigate it. Some Democrats have said they want him to testify.
But the FBI has so far found no evidence that he or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to the four current and former law enforcement officials."
Reuters LINK
===
You still going ignore what the FBI stated?
You still going ignore the fact that after a YEAR of investigations that ZERO Sedition/insurrection charges are made?
Your own
Capital Breach Case link doesn't show any.
You still haven't posted actual Sedition/Insurrection charges even when I brought that up in my previous reply, you still haven't posted any in your latest reply.
Come on get real here you continue to flail over it while the FBI and DOJ haven't made any such charges which is WHY you haven't posted any.