By the way, you are spreading outright lies.
Bush, total jobs created in 8 years: Negative 673,000
Obama created more private sector jobs in his first 6 months, than bush did during his entire presidency.
By the way, you are spreading outright lies.
Bush, total jobs created in 8 years: Negative 673,000
Obama created more private sector jobs in his first 6 months, than bush did during his entire presidency.
no, thinkprogress is spreading outright lies. I used the figures from the archived employment situation reports. Household data, dear. A prime example of why not to believe anything you read from a bias source.
By the way, you are spreading outright lies.
Bush, total jobs created in 8 years: Negative 673,000
Obama created more private sector jobs in his first 6 months, than bush did during his entire presidency.
no, thinkprogress is spreading outright lies. I used the figures from the archived employment situation reports. Household data, dear. A prime example of why not to believe anything you read from a bias source.
Bush didn't leave office with a total of negative 673,000 jobs?
If you think otherwise, you must be some brainwashed moron, or "the archived employment situation reports" is actually "A bunch of shit made up by Beck that I like because I'm a stupid right wing moron that believes anything my masters tell me"
?
Are you adding this properly? This would seems like a relatively simple thing to do no matter how meaningless it is devoid of other factors.
From what you posted, he started 2001 with 135,999,000 and ended with Jan 2009 with 142,099,000.
142,099,000 – 135,999,000 is 6,100,000 POSITIVE JOBS
Ending Jobs---Starting Jobs
Where are you getting the loss from your data?
---------------------------------------------------NEVER MIND--------------------------------------------------
I was confusing the quotes and what you were getting at. I thought you were trying to reinforce
the negative numbers in the graphic – not dispute them.
?
Are you adding this properly? This would seems like a relatively simple thing to do no matter how meaningless it is devoid of other factors.
From what you posted, he started 2001 with 135,999,000 and ended with Jan 2009 with 142,099,000.
142,099,000 – 135,999,000 is 6,100,000 POSITIVE JOBS
Ending Jobs---Starting Jobs
Where are you getting the loss from your data?
---------------------------------------------------NEVER MIND--------------------------------------------------
I was confusing the quotes and what you were getting at. I thought you were trying to reinforce
the negative numbers in the graphic – not dispute them.
that's ok, at least you were able to verify my numbers for black label.
So, you want to look at B data, rather than total jobs. Well, sure , it looks like that BUT?
Are you adding this properly? This would seems like a relatively simple thing to do no matter how meaningless it is devoid of other factors.
From what you posted, he started 2001 with 135,999,000 and ended with Jan 2009 with 142,099,000.
142,099,000 – 135,999,000 is 6,100,000 POSITIVE JOBS
Ending Jobs---Starting Jobs
Where are you getting the loss from your data?
---------------------------------------------------NEVER MIND--------------------------------------------------
I was confusing the quotes and what you were getting at. I thought you were trying to reinforce
the negative numbers in the graphic – not dispute them.
that's ok, at least you were able to verify my numbers for black label.
Yep, you are one stupid ******* idiot. Did you even read your own links?
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: JANUARY 2009 Nonfarm payroll employment fell sharply in January (-598,000) and the unemployment rate rose from 7.2 to 7.6 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today. Payroll employment has declined by 3.6 million since the start of the recession in December 2007; about one-half of this decline occurred in the past 3 months. In January, job losses were large and wi despread across nearly all major industry sector
Manufacturing employment fell by 207,000 in January, the largest 1-month decline since October 1982.
In January, durable goods manufacturing lost 157,000 jobs, with notable decreases in fabricated metal products
(-37,000), motor vehicles and parts (-31,000), and machinery (-22,000). Employment in nondurable goods manufacturing declined by 50,000 over the month
The private sector got absolutely destroyed under W and the GOP, though as usual and I predicted, right wing hacks like yourself just look at what you want to see, make up lies, and ignore the truth.
Look at the statistics for the private sector, your supposed excuse for "job creation" are government jobs W was creating left and right to try and save face like expanding on his huge government DHS and TSA, "fluff" positions to their cronies, and other taxpayer wasting BS.
The only jobs W and the GOP could create, were government jobs by using taxpayer funds to bankroll their huge government oversight organizations.
