Which Party Is The Big Tent Inclusive Party?

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Is it the party who censures Kyrsten Sinema for not going along with the collective?

Or is it the party who censures Liz Cheney for not going along with the collective?

Is it the party who wants to run bisexuals out of the party?

Or is it the party that wants to cancel LGBTQ altogether?

Is it the party who wants to primary Sinema and Manchin out because they are not welcome in the party tent and want to exclude them from the inclusive party?

Or is it the party who wants to primary Cheney and Kinzinger out because they are not welcome in the party tent and want to exclude them from the inclusive party?

Hmm. Seems like neither.

 

[JWBooth]

Republicans of course

Bwahahahahahahahaha good un.

 

[JWBooth]

Which Party Is The Big Tent Inclusive Party?​

The Libertarian Party, they’ll take anybody except libertarians.

 

[rightwinger]

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, are you that uniformed that the Arizona Democratic Party censured Sinema? Are you that uniformed that democrats want to primary Sinema and Manchin out to get rid of them?

Sinemas censure came because of her votes, not because she is a woman.
Republicans also censure and primary those who do not toe the party line. They call them RINOs
It is called politics.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Ever hear of Liz Cheney?
How is she doing?

Democrats welcome Blacks and all minorities. Muslims, Jews and Atheists. Homosexuals and Transexuals. Women.

Republicans welcome white males and an occasional woman

Democrats welcome everyone you just mentioned conditionally. If any minority chooses to go against Democrats on any level, the Democrats smear and vindictiveness is over the top.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats welcome everyone you just mentioned conditionally. If any minority chooses to go against Democrats on any level, the Democrats smear and vindictiveness is over the top.

It is part of being in a political party

Dems still have Manchin and Sinema
Republicans still have Collins and Romney
I notice they are going after Murkowski

 

[FA_Q2]

Anyone who thinks republicans have a bigger tent than democrats is a fucking idiot who doesn't understand our modern politics. At all

Republicans are conservatives....That inherently narrows your slice of what you can support relative to people who openly profess being progressive you dipshit.

No conservative should want to be part of a "big tent" party, lol

As some one who hasn't voted democrat since 08 let me assure you, you don't want what you think you do.

Big tent = non main stream = not conservative. It's not 1980 go in a hole and die you fucking idiot. And the democratic commies existed then too Republicans were just too stupid to realize they were in fact the united ones. They're commies or they're a small tent. Pick one

That is an odd version of politics.

Conservatives are, if we are going by definition and not party, those that support traditions and the status quo. Essentially, the job of conservatives in the political sphere is to protect those institutions that are working. Liberals are the ones that want to push those institutions further or, in the more extreme circumstances, remove them entirely.

I would say that means in any functional society, and our society is quite functional, that conservatives should absolutely be the 'big tenet party' aka has broad appeal across society in general.

The fact that the republicans are not that is not indicative of conservatism but rather indicative of the republicans failure to actually be conservative.

 

[FA_Q2]

Which Party Is The Big Tent Inclusive Party?​

The Libertarian Party, they’ll take anybody except libertarians.

lol.

Not really. The libertarian party will take ANYONE.

The problem is no one wants to be a libertarian. They want to be on the 'winning' team.

 

[Independentthinker]

Which one are we talking about here? For the Republicans, the only ones they want out are some that voted to Impeach Trump in two sham impeachments.

For Dems they want to censure/primary two for voting against filibuster reform.

These are merely current events compared to the real battle for each party's "soul" and the concept of having diverse views (to a point) in a given party.

One side requires groupthink, the other does not. Both are coalitions of various actual positions.

I'm just saying that it is democrats who outright claim they are the big tent inclusive party and yet it is the dems who are trying to exclude people from their own party. How is excluding people inclusive?

 

[Independentthinker]

Or is it the party who censures Liz Cheney for not going along with the collective?

Or is it the party that wants to cancel LGBTQ altogether?

Or is it the party who wants to primary Cheney and Kinzinger out because they are not welcome in the party tent and want to exclude them from the inclusive party?

Hmm. Seems like neither.

I'm just saying it is DEMOCRATS who claim they are the big tent inclusive party and it is DEMOCRATS who are trying to exclude people from their big tent inclusive party. How is it inclusive to exclude people? How is it inclusive when they try excluding a bisexual out of their party?

 

[Independentthinker]

Sinemas censure came because of her votes, not because she is a woman.
Republicans also censure and primary those who do not toe the party line. They call them RINOs
It is called politics.

So, you are trying to say that both parties aren't inclusive and both parties exclude people from their party who they don't want.

 

[rightwinger]

So, you are trying to say that both parties aren't inclusive and both parties exclude people from their party who they don't want.

I think you need to Google inclusive

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Is it the party who censures Kyrsten Sinema for not going along with the collective? Is it the party who wants to run bisexuals out of the party? Is it the party who wants to primary Sinema and Manchin out because they are not welcome in the party tent and want to exclude them from the inclusive party?

Depends on your definition of "inclusive".
And whether the inclusiveness is token, or real.
For instance - black people.
The Democratic Party believes they are inclusive with blacks. And they maintain that belief through bribery.
Bribery in the form of all manner of free money, no strings attached paid tuition knowing absolutely that the majority of that money will be given to students who will never graduate. They could care less. They just want to stand at a podium and say they paid the tuition.
The Democratic Party is extremely good at bribing minorities of all kind into going with them. It works very well in their favor.

 

[lennypartiv]

Or is it the party who censures Liz Cheney for not going along with the collective?

Or is it the party that wants to cancel LGBTQ altogether?

Or is it the party who wants to primary Cheney and Kinzinger out because they are not welcome in the party tent and want to exclude them from the inclusive party?

Hmm. Seems like neither.

Which party approves of discriminating against white men?

 

[rightwinger]

I'm just saying it is DEMOCRATS who claim they are the big tent inclusive party and it is DEMOCRATS who are trying to exclude people from their big tent inclusive party. How is it inclusive to exclude people? How is it inclusive when they try excluding a bisexual out of their party?

It is a Democratic Tent welcome to all races, religions, sexes and sexual orientations

The Republican Tent?
Not so much

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Which party approves of discriminating against white men?

Same answer.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I'm just saying it is DEMOCRATS who claim they are the big tent inclusive party and it is DEMOCRATS who are trying to exclude people from their big tent inclusive party.

I know what you're saying, and I think your opinion is skewed by partisanship. I believe neither party is inclusive unless you toe the party line.

 

[rightwinger]

Which party approves of discriminating against white men?

Democrats have elected many white men along with blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Muslims, Jews, Christians, gays, transexuals and many more women than Republicans

 

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

Or is it the party who censures Liz Cheney for not going along with the collective?

Wrong Bumbling Bumblebrain.

Liz Cheney turned on her own voter and turned traitor on the head of her party, and assisting the enemies with creating a one-party socialist state. Thats why she is on the ours, moron

 

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

Democrats have elected many white men along with blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Muslims, Jews, Christians, gays, transexuals and many more women than Republicans

Democrats elect Marxist idiots like you. Their color matters not, asshat