Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elburn man accused of having sex with dog
By Tona Kunz Daily Herald Staff Writer
Posted 7/16/2004
Police are searching for an Elburn man charged with molesting a pit bull-boxer mix.
A warrant was issued for Daniel J. Joyner, 27, of 40W019 Hughes Road in Elburn Thursday after a 2 1/2-week investigation into complaints from the dog's owner, a Geneva woman, that Joyner injured the animal in June after having sex with it in Geneva.
Joyner faces felony charges of engaging in sexual conduct with an animal and criminal damage to property. He could face up to nine years in prison and $75,000 but is also eligible for probation.
The dog has recovered and is back with its owner, said Debra Bree, assistant Kane County state's attorney.
Sexual abuse of animals has dropped off in recent years, although more people are reporting animal neglect and cruelty, Bree said.
Joyner also is wanted by police on a warrant alleging he failed to appear in drug court for follow up on charges of possession of controlled substances and a syringe. He also has a lengthy record in Geneva, Batavia, St. Charles and North Aurora for possession of cannabis, breaking into cars, theft and DUI.
Joyner is 6 foot 4 inches tall, 200 pound with brown hair and blue eyes.
Anyone who has information about Joyner should contact the Geneva Police Department at (630) 232-4736.
The dog has recovered and is back with its owner, said Debra Bree, assistant Kane County state's attorney.
Sexual abuse of animals has dropped off in recent years, although more people are reporting animal neglect and cruelty, Bree said.
HGROKIT said:You have got to be kidding me!
This does not even belong in the humor Forum. Do we not have a Believe it or Not, or Stranger Than Fiction forum?
But anyway, what's the problem? He was probably just throwing the dog a bone.
:teeth:
Kathianne said:Enough with the smilies, we need audio! drum and cymbals!
HGROKIT said:I'll see what I can come up with!
I am then reminded of a childhood diddy:
"with a nick nack paddy wack..."
Those of us old enough will appreciate the humor in that one!
LOL - me too!Kathianne said:Sad, but I'm old enough! Loved that man rolling home!
HGROKIT said:LOL - me too!
Am enjoying teaching it to my grandchildren.
hehehe - rots o ruckKathianne said:Waiting for the grandchildren! Just wishing they wait until they are 35 to get married! ~slap to me~I'm jaded!
So I'm hearing from the nearly 23 year old daughter! Only moments ago, she was saying, "You may only have 1 cookie, my mommy says so!"HGROKIT said:hehehe - rots o ruck
Kathianne said:So I'm hearing from the nearly 23 year old daughter! Only moments ago, she was saying, "You may only have 1 cookie, my mommy says so!"
HGROKIT said:Well, at least she is still listening to mommy!
My boys...well, let's just leave it at they are boys. The grandkids are boys too. So, there is some truth to the saying that what goes around comes around.
insein said:All that out of a topic of man/dog loving, lol. :rotflmao:
Kathianne said:So I'm hearing from the nearly 23 year old daughter! Only moments ago, she was saying, "You may only have 1 cookie, my mommy says so!"
insein said:http://www.dailyherald.com/search/main_story.asp?intID=3818451
Sounds like a card-carrying member of the ACLU if i ever did hear one.
DKSuddeth said:Don't hate the player, hate the game.
seriously, this isn't a civil rights issue and you know it. this is a criminal act. I don't understand why so many people hate the ACLU, is it because they don't give a damn about civil rights?
-=d=- said:Take every argument that exists for the pro-homosexual agenda, and apply it to this guy shafting the pooch. That's why the ACLU sucks.
DKSuddeth said:where is anyone applying those arguments to this issue? they are obviously two totally different situations not even comparable except to those that are trying to equate the gay marriage issue to people marrying cats and dogs.
-=d=- said:They are the same issue - at stake is a person's right to prefer whichever sexual connections they want. Rights to privacy...Rights to live and to love.
I'm saying, if you apply those arguments to this issue, you'll have the reason the ACLU was mentioned.
DKSuddeth said:wow, and here all along I thought it was just about human sexual connections, not all sexual connections. what the hell was I thinking.
