Where is the Consensus survey

[abu afak]

Consensus is not a word used in science, it's a Cult word

Scientific consensus​

Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.[1][2]

Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.

Popular or political debate on subjects that are controversial within the Public sphere but Not necessarily controversial within the Scientific community may invoke scientific consensus: note such topics as evolution,[13][14] climate change,[15] the safety of genetically modified organisms,[16] or the lack of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism.[10]

Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

`

 

[ReinyDays]

Ask them to post one (1) repeatable experiment demonstrating the expected temperature increase by increasing CO2 from 280 to 420PPM and we get

Or at least include the entire temperature record ... this only counting from 1980 is statistical bullshit ... not even the IPCC is that craven ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Scientific consensus​

Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.[1][2]

Consensus is achieved through scholarly communication at conferences, the publication process, replication of reproducible results by others, scholarly debate,[3][4][5][6] and peer review. A conference meant to create a consensus is termed as a consensus conference.[7][8][9] Such measures lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists; however, communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the "normal" debates through which science progresses may appear to outsiders as contestation.[10] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community, or consensus review articles[11] or surveys[12] may be published. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing the consensus can be quite straightforward.

Popular or political debate on subjects that are controversial within the Public sphere but Not necessarily controversial within the Scientific community may invoke scientific consensus: note such topics as evolution,[13][14] climate change,[15] the safety of genetically modified organisms,[16] or the lack of a link between MMR vaccinations and autism.[10]

Scientific consensus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

`

Still testing gravity, but climate is "settled" LOL!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Remember the consensus around the Big Bang? That didn't survive testing

 

[Crepitus]

Okay, you can link to wikipedia, can you link to a study, a report, a survey, anything other that an abstract which tells us what we to believe is in the study.

POST A STUDY

YOu gotta read the link, kid.

 

[elektra]

YOu gotta read the link, kid.

show me

 

[elektra]

The statistic comes from the fact that any scientific paper that doesn't mention AGW is a positive trial ... in other words, 1% of papers argue against AGW, 99% don't ... even if the conclusion doesn't support AGW, this paper would be counted as a positive ...

It's one photon per molecule ... and there's just not enough CO2 molecules in the atmosphere ...

I contend the papers do not state a positive or negative idea about CO2 and that most papers had nothing to do with global warming.

That is why we are not allowed to see the papers.

 

[Crepitus]

show me

I already quoted it in the post with the link.

 

[elektra]

YOu gotta read the link, kid.

real world solution to what?

 

[elektra]

2. Footnotes with ALL The Studies cited. Click away![/SIZE]

Survey Links/References 1​

1. ^ Jump up to:a b c Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (10): 104030. Bibcode:2021ERL....16j4030M. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. S2CID 239047650.
2. ^ John Cook; et al. (April 2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Powell, James Lawrence (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Perry, Simon (19 October 2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode:2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. S2CID 239032360.
5. ^ Benestad, Rasmus E.; Nuccitelli, Dana; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Hayhoe, Katharine; Hygen, Hans Olav; van Dorland, Rob; Cook, John (1 November 2016). "Learning from mistakes in climate research". Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 126 (3): 699–703. Bibcode:2016ThApC.126..699B. doi:10.1007/s00704-015-1597-5. ISSN 1434-4483.
6. ^ "Total radiative forcing is positive and has led to an uptake of energy by the climate system. The largest contribution to total radiative forcing is caused by the increase in the atmospheric concentration of CO2 since 1750." and "From 1750 to 2011, CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production have released 375 [345 to 405] GtC to the atmosphere, while deforestation and other land-use change are estimated to have released 180 [100 to 260] GtC." In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
7. ^ IPCC, 2013: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. "Extremely likely" is defined as a 95–100% likelihood on p 2.
8. ^ "Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF). 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2014-04-20. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001). This warming has already led to changes in the Earth's climate.
9. ^ "'Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.' IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group I, Summary for Policymakers. 'The best estimate of the human-induced contribution to warming is similar to the observed warming over this period.'" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 October 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
10. ^ Julie Brigham-Grette; et al. (September 2006). "Petroleum Geologists' Award to Novelist Crichton Is Inappropriate". Eos. 87 (36): 364. Bibcode:2006EOSTr..87..364B. doi:10.1029/2006EO360008. The AAPG stands alone among scientific societies in its denial of human-induced effects on global warming.
11. ^ DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M. (2007). Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. The MIT Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-262-54193-0.
12. ^ Stoddard, Isak; Anderson, Kevin; Capstick, Stuart; Carton, Wim; Depledge, Joanna; Facer, Keri; Gough, Clair; Hache, Frederic; Hoolohan, Claire; Hultman, Martin; Hällström, Niclas; Kartha, Sivan; Klinsky, Sonja; Kuchler, Magdalena; Lövbrand, Eva; Nasiritousi, Naghmeh; Newell, Peter; Peters, Glen P.; Sokona, Youba; Stirling, Andy; Stilwell, Matthew; Spash, Clive L.; Williams, Mariama; et al. (18 October 2021). "Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve?". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 46 (1): 653–689. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104. hdl:1983/93c742bc-4895-42ac-be81-535f36c5039d. ISSN 1543-5938. S2CID 233815004. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
13. ^ Mann, Michael E.; Toles, Tom (2016). The Madhouse Effect. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/mann17786. ISBN 978-0231541817.
14. ^ Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik (2012). Merchants of doubt : how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1408824832. OCLC 934374946.
15. ^ "Public perceptions on climate change" (PDF). PERITIA Trust EU - The Policy Institute of King's College London. June 2022. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2022.
16. ^ Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806.
17. ^ Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Perry, Simon (19 October 2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode:2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. S2CID 239032360.
18. ^ Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (10): 104030. Bibcode:2021ERL....16j4030M. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. S2CID 239047650.
19. ^ Jump up to:a b Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We're Not Wrong?". In DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M. (eds.). Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. MIT Press. pp. 65–66. ISBN 978-0-262-54193-0.
20. ^ Jump up to:a b "The Science of Climate Change". Science Magazine.[permanent dead link]
21. ^ "Climate Change Research: Issues for the Atmospheric and Related Sciences Adopted by the AMS Council 9 February 2003". Ametsoc.org. 9 February 2003. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
22. ^ "Joint Science Academies' Statement" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-09. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
23. ^ Jump up to:a b AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change www.aaas.org December 2006
24. ^ "Australian Coral Reef Society". Australian Coral Reef Society. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
25. ^ Australian Coral Reef Society official letter Archived 22 March 2006 at the Wayback Machine, 16 June 2006
26. ^ Jump up to:a b "Joint statement by the Network of African Science Academies (NASAC) to the G8 on sustainability, energy efficiency and climate change". Network of African Science Academies. 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2012.
27. ^ Jump up to:a b "INQUA Statement On Climate Change" (PDF).
28. ^ US NRC (2008). Understanding and Responding to Climate Change. A brochure prepared by the US National Research Council (US NRC) (PDF). Washington DC, US: US National Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2013-06-27.
29. ^ "Did You Know?". www.ncdc.noaa.gov. National Centers for Environmental Information, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 1 October 2019.
30. ^ Jump up to:a b c Climate Change to the Year 2000: A Survey of Expert Opinion (PDF) (Report). February 1978.
31. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Stewart, Thomas R.; Mumpower, Jeryl L.; Reagan-Cirincione, Patricia (April 1992). Scientists' Agreement and Disagreement about Global Climate Change: Evidence from Surveys (PDF) (Report).
32. ^ Jump up to:a b Bray, Dennis; Hans von Storch (1999). "Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 80 (3): 439–455. Bibcode:1999BAMS...80..439B. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0439:CSAEEO>2.0.CO;2. ISSN 1520-0477.
33. ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A.; Nuccitelli, Dana; Jacobs, Peter; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Rice, Ken (2016). "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (4): 048002. Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002. ISSN 1748-9326.
34. ^ Cook, John; Nuccitelli, Dana; Green, Sarah A.; Richardson, Mark; Winkler, Bärbel; Painting, Rob; Way, Robert; Jacobs, Peter; Skuce, Andrew (15 May 2013). "Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature". Environ. Res. Lett. IOP Publishing Ltd. 8 (2): 024024. Bibcode:2013ERL.....8b4024C. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024.
35. ^ "Scientific and Public Perspectives on Climate Change / Scientists' vs. Public Understanding of Human-Caused Global Warming". climatecommunication.yale.edu. Yale University. 29 May 2013. Archived from the original on 17 April 2019.
36. ^ Jump up to:a b Wuebbles, D.J.; Fahey, D.W.; Hibbard, K.A.; Deangelo, B.; Doherty, S.; Hayhoe, K.; Horton, R.; Kossin, J.P.; Taylor, P.C.; Waple, A.M.; Yohe, C.P. (23 November 2018). "Climate Science Special Report / Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I /Executive Summary / Highlights of the Findings of the U.S. Global Change Research Program Climate Science Special Report". globalchange.gov. U.S. Global Change Research Program: 1–470. doi:10.7930/J0DJ5CTG. Archived from the original on 14 June 2019.
37. ^ "Scientific consensus: Earth's climate is warming". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Archived from the original on 17 June 2019. Retrieved 18 August 2018. Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position.
38. ^ "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level." IPCC, Synthesis Report Archived 2018-11-02 at the Wayback Machine, Section 1.1: Observations of climate change Archived 2018-08-04 at the Wayback Machine, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007.
39. ^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF), Detection and Attribution of Climate Change, "It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century" (page 17) and "In this Summary for Policymakers, the following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: ... extremely likely: 95–100%" (page 2)., in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
40. ^ IPCC, Synthesis Report Archived 2018-11-02 at the Wayback Machine, Section 2.4: Attribution of climate change Archived 2018-11-03 at the Wayback Machine, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007."It is likely that increases in GHG concentrations alone would have caused more warming than observed because volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols have offset some warming that would otherwise have taken place."
41. ^ [Notes-SciPanel] America's Climate Choices: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change; National Research Council (2010). Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-14588-6. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014. (p1) there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that climate is changing and that these changes are in large part caused by human activities. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations. * * * (p. 21–22) Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.
42. ^ "The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)". NOAA.gov. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Spring 2023. Archived from the original on 24 May 2023.
43. ^ Ogden, Aynslie & Cohen, Stewart (2002). "Integration and Synthesis: Assessing Climate Change Impacts in Northern Canada" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2007. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
44. ^ Jump up to:a b McGrath, Matt (2021-08-09). "Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity'". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-09.
45. ^ IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp. doi:10.1017/9781009157896.
46. ^ "UN climate science talks open amid heatwaves, floods and drought". UN News. 2021-07-26. Archived from the original on 2021-08-02. Retrieved 2021-08-02.
47. ^ Dunne, Daisy (2021-08-10). "How scientists around the world reacted to the IPCC's landmark climate report". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-13.
48. ^ Jump up to:a b "The IPCC delivers its starkest warning about the world's climate". The Economist. 2021-08-09. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 2021-08-12. Retrieved 2021-08-09.
49. ^ Plumer, Brad; Fountain, Henry (2021-08-11) [2021-08-09]. "A Hotter Future Is Certain, Climate Panel Warns. But How Hot Is Up to Us". Climate Change: U.N. Climate Report. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2021-08-13. Retrieved 2021-08-09.
50. ^ Harvey, Fiona (2021-08-09). "Major climate changes inevitable and irreversible – IPCC's starkest warning yet". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
51. ^ Sullivan, Helen (2021-08-10). "'Code red for humanity': what the papers say about the IPCC report on the climate crisis". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2021-08-11. Retrieved 2021-08-11.
52. ^ "AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023". www.ipcc.ch. Retrieved 2023-03-27.
53. ^ Synthesis Report Of The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Longer Report (PDF). IPCC. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
54. ^ Synthesis Report Of The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Summary for Policymakers (PDF). IPCC. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
55. ^ "Press conference slides FINAL_PDF" (PDF). IPCC Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. United Nations. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
56. ^ "Headline Statements". IPCC Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. United Nations. Retrieved 2 April 2023.
57. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC (2014) The IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) leaflet
58. ^ Agenda item 3; Annex III. "REPORT OF THE 31ST SESSION OF THE IPCC" (PDF). IPCC.
59. ^ "Scope, Content and Process for the Preparation of the Synthesis Report (SYR) of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)" (PDF). IPCC.
60. ^ Collins, M.; et al. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (Working Group I contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report). Chapter 12: Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility (Section 12.3.1.3): Cambridge University Press. pp. 1045–1047. ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0.
61. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
62. ^ Nesbit, Jeff (2013). "Settled Science".
63. ^ Redfearn, Graham (27 September 2013). "IPCC climate change report by numbers". Planet Oz. Guardian.
64. ^ "Fossil fuels should be 'phased out by 2100' says IPCC". BBC. 2 November 2014. Retrieved 2 November 2014.
65. ^ "Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). IPCC. Retrieved 1 August 2015.
66. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): B. Observed Changes in the Climate System, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 2
67. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): B.5 Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 9
68. ^ Jump up to:a b IPCC (11 November 2013): D. Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 13
69. ^ IPCC (11 November 2013): Footnote 2, in: Summary for Policymakers (finalized version) Archived 9 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, in: IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 2
70. ^ Jump up to:a b Summary for Policymakers, p.14 (archived 25 June 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
71. ^ Summary for Policymakers, p.23 (archived 25 June 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG2 A 2014
72. ^ SPM.3 Trends in stocks and flows of greenhouse gases and their drivers, in: Summary for Policymakers Archived 2020-01-28 at the Wayback Machine, p.8 (archived 2 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
73. ^ Victor, D., et al., Executive summary, in: Chapter 1: Introductory Chapter, p.4 (archived 3 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
74. ^ SPM.4.1 Long‐term mitigation pathways, in: Summary for Policymakers, p.15 (archived 2 July 2014), in IPCC AR5 WG3 2014
75. ^ "Warming 'very likely' human-made". BBC News. BBC. 1 February 2007. Retrieved 1 February 2007.
76. ^ "Summary for Policymakers", 1. Observed changes in climate and their effects, archived from the original on 2018-11-03, retrieved 2013-06-04, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
77. ^ "Summary for Policymakers", 2. Causes of change, archived from the original on 2018-02-28, retrieved 2013-06-04, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
78. ^ Jump up to:a b c Parry, M.L.; et al., "Technical summary", Industry, settlement and society, in: Box TS.5. The main projected impacts for systems and sectors, archived from the original on 2018-11-02, retrieved 2013-06-04, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
79. ^ IPCC, "Summary for Policymakers", Magnitudes of impact, archived from the original on 2018-11-02, retrieved 2013-06-04, in IPCC AR4 WG2 2007
80. ^ "Synthesis report", Ecosystems, in: Sec 3.3.1 Impacts on systems and sectors, archived from the original on 3 November 2018, retrieved 4 June 2013, in IPCC AR4 SYR 2007
81. ^ "Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I - Chapter 3: Detection and Attribution of Climate Change". science2017.globalchange.gov. U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP): 1–470. 2017. Archived from the original on 23 September 2019. Adapted directly from Fig. 3.3.
82. ^ "Downloads.globalchange.gov" (PDF).
83. ^ "Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment New Scientific Consensus: Arctic Is Warming Rapidly". UNEP/GRID-Arendal. 8 November 2004. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
84. ^ "ACIA Display". Amap.no. Archived from the original on 14 December 2010. Retrieved 30 July 2012.
85. ^ Cook, John; Oreskes, Naomi; Doran, Peter T.; Anderegg, William R. L.; Verheggen, Bart; Maibach, Ed W.; Carlton, J. Stuart; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Skuce, Andrew G.; Green, Sarah A. (2016), "Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming", Environmental Research Letters, 11 (44): 048002, Bibcode:2016ERL....11d8002C, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002048002
86. ^ Roper, Willem. "Global Warming Chart - Here's How Temperatures Have Risen Since 1950". World Economic Forum. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
87. ^ Slade, David H. (1989). "A survey of informed opinion regarding the nature and reality of a 'global greenhouse warming'". Climatic Change. 16: 1-4. doi:10.1007/BF00137342.
88. ^ GECR climate survey shows strong agreement on action, less so on warming (Report). Vol. 2. Global Environmental Change Report. 1990. pp. 1–3.
89. ^ "World warming at record 0.2 C per decade, scientists warn". Phys.org. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
90. ^ Jump up to:a b c Bray, Dennis; Storch, Hans von. "Climate Scientists' Perceptions of Climate Change Science" (PDF). GKSS Report 11/2007.
91. ^ "Climate scientists' views on climate change: a survey". Nature Climate Change. 8 August 2007. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help)
92. ^ Naomi Oreskes (3 December 2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change" (PDF). Science. 306 (5702): 1686. doi:10.1126/science.1103618. PMID 15576594. S2CID 153792099.
93. ^ Lichter, S. Robert (24 April 2008). "Climate Scientists Agree on Warming, Disagree on Dangers, and Don't Trust the Media's Coverage of Climate Change". Statistical Assessment Service, George Mason University. Archived from the original on 11 January 2010. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
94. ^ ""Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change"". Journalist's Resource.org.
95. ^ Stephen J. Farnsworth; S. Robert Lichter (27 October 2011). "The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change". International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Archived from the original on 11 March 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2011.
96. ^ Lavelle, Marianne (23 April 2008). "Survey Tracks Scientists' Growing Climate Concern". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
97. ^ Bray, Dennis; von Storch, Hans (2010). "A Survey of the Perspectives of Climate Scientists Concerning Climate Science and Climate Change" (PDF).
98. ^ Bray, Dennis (August 2010). "The scientific consensus of climate change revisited" (PDF). Environmental Science & Policy. 13 (5): 340–350. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.001., copy online at [1]
99. ^ Bray, D.; von Storch H. (2009). "Prediction' or 'Projection; The nomenclature of climate science" (PDF). Science Communication. 30 (4): 534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698. S2CID 145338218.
100. ^ "Ice sheet melt on track with 'worst-case climate scenario'". www.esa.int. Retrieved 8 September 2020.

​

Nice cut/paste, pick a study if you think they are there, then we will have piece of meat to chew on. What are you afraid of.

 

[Crepitus]

real world solution to what?

 

[Oddball]

Nice cut/paste, pick a study if you think they are there, then we will have piece of meat to chew on. What are you afraid of.

The warmer moonbats have never read them themselves....They just appeal to authority with a blizzard of links, and you're just supposed to sit down, shut up, and eat your bugs.

 

[elektra]

I already quoted it in the post with the link.

I followed your link, a wiki page stating over and over, there is a consensus

I just want that magical study in its full glory. Eventually I am sure someone will post the abstract or a follow up study claiming the original is good.

The actual study, with the method, key questions, key words they used will never be shown. Further we will not be allowed to the reference material. We will not see the titles. We will not the authors names.

 

[Oddball]

real world solution to what?

And where's any evidence that your "solution" would actually work?

 

[Crepitus]

I followed your link, a wiki page stating over and over, there is a consensus

I just want that magical study in its full glory. Eventually I am sure someone will post the abstract or a follow up study claiming the original is good.

The actual study, with the method, key questions, key words they used will never be shown. Further we will not be allowed to the reference material. We will not see the titles. We will not the authors names.

Are you fucking stupid?

 

[elektra]

The warmer moonbats have never read them themselves....They just appeal to authority with a blizzard of links, and you're just supposed to sit down, shut up, and eat your bugs.

I clicked on two dozen links in the wiki pages, a huge waste of my time.

Google is the perfect propaganda tool

 

[elektra]

Are you fucking stupid?

I must be, that is why I keep requesting a study and all I get is wiki pages

 

[Crepitus]

I must be, that is why I keep requesting a study and all I get is wiki pages

Maybe get somebody to read that wiki entry to you.

 

[elektra]

Maybe get somebody to read that wiki entry to you.

why not just post the study

 

[Oddball]

I clicked on two dozen links in the wiki pages, a huge waste of my time.

Google is the perfect propaganda tool

Basically why I reject Wiki out of hand for shit like this.