When the Arizona Supreme Court eliminated the Fraudulent Votes Today, the Pro-Trump margin in Georgia began to collapse

[The2ndAmendment]

What a coincidence. Democrats didn't think they needed Georgia...until the Arizona Supreme Court eliminated the Fraudulent Mail in Overvote. As the decision came down, the insurmountable Trump margin in Georgia began to rapidly collapse.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

 

[The Original Tree]

They need to sue appeal, sue and appeal in every state that has irregularities.

Every vote must be challenged and verified and matched up with a registered and living voter!

I believe we need to pray for President Trump and God is testing our faith.

Massive voter fraud, and God will expose it if we are faithful.

I believe President Trump will be our President.

God is not ready to turn America over to Evil, Satanic, Globalist Marxists!

If you love America, pray for our Republic and President Trump.

 

[The Original Tree]

 

[JimBowie1958]

What a coincidence. Democrats didn't think they needed Georgia...until the Arizona Supreme Court eliminated the Fraudulent Mail in Overvote. As the decision came down, the insurmountable Trump margin in Georgia began to rapidly collapse.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

If Trump's program to secure the vote with DHS actions is true as reported by the WaPo article here; then Trump can have DHS verify the ballots very quickly and easily.

Trump is not going to be robbed by cheating lying criminal Dimocrat jack asses.

 

[theHawk]

What a coincidence. Democrats didn't think they needed Georgia...until the Arizona Supreme Court eliminated the Fraudulent Mail in Overvote. As the decision came down, the insurmountable Trump margin in Georgia began to rapidly collapse.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

They need to arrest Fontes’ communist ass.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

What a coincidence. Democrats didn't think they needed Georgia...until the Arizona Supreme Court eliminated the Fraudulent Mail in Overvote. As the decision came down, the insurmountable Trump margin in Georgia began to rapidly collapse.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

They need to arrest Fontes’ communist ass.

Already a thread on this. But I'll restate my response anyway.

The Court found that the instructions on the original mail-in vote packets were improper for August before they were mailed out. But it also found that they were corrected in October to the correct instructions before they were mailed out. The instructions did NOT cause improper voting.

Don't you read your own cites?