The answer to this question cannot be simply attributed to the laziness and incompetence of US citizens.
Anyone seriously looking for a comprehensive answer to the problems due to massive unemployment and lack of industry will have to examine a number of topics.
Although I could give some short answers to the questions, to do so would only invite a plethora of challenges to "back up" what I say and insults from those to whom the implications of those answers would be obvious.
So I would suggest that anyone who asks the OPs question in other terms than as a rhetorical way of introducing a proposal of "austerity" such as those which are being offered to the people of Ukraine by the IMF, that they begin here.
History and Purpose of NAFTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9dGHuRExiM
Free Trade is BS. I disagreed with it since it's beginnings. It has outsourced more jobs to countries with laughable standards.
Our trade agreements were negotiated on a case by case treaty for over 200 years and it worked. Some how it was suddenly broken and no longer needed, and the results are clear that we made the wrong decisions.
These treaties are made to level the playing field to countries like China who have BS EPA requirements. In this area, you must be careful not to tariff too much as your prices will increase as a result.
I've gotten into this area with those I usually agree with many times, but will continue to push for getting rid of Free Trade Agreements.
Exactly! If one didn't know better, he might think that foreign trade negotiations were deliberately designed to ham string US industry and set up conditions to deindustrialize it.
I included Griffin and Fitts because I don't think what either of them have to say about the US economy is unrelated to the position that it's citizens find themselves in. How could they be?
I won't argue that you can't find softness and sloth among the American people. At what point in history have those traits ever been entirely absent from a population?
But an argument which tries to pin the blame for the collapsing economy at the doorstep of the general public without factoring in the actions of those whose decisions have much greater macroeconomic effects smacks of an attempt to justify or ignore the actions of those at the top.
It also appears to me as a prelude to coming "austerity measures" such as those which have been imposed upon Greece and other countries which have been caught in the snare of the IMF and their globalist cronies.
Where the sloth of the people enters in is when the masses are offered MARXIST Socialist "solutions" for problems which scarcely exist until the people are suckered into accepting the notion that everything in the world can be free of charge.
To those on the receiving end of the Social largesse, it may seem to be a party. But eventually the well runs dry and the only thing the masses have to share "equally" among themselves is the misery of their poverty. Meanwhile the Marxist socialist engineers who set the whole plan in motion use the power of the state they have acquired to see to it that they personally never do without.
The blacks, Mexicans, and leftist hopheads all believe that Marxism is the cat's meow. It means "stickin' it to da man" and "gettin' what's rightfully comin' to 'em". Naturally they will all join their Marxist Jewish colleagues in voting for every socialized program that's introduced and will continue to do so until the entire nation is reduced to the state of communist China and the former Soviet Union.
This is the dream of the "workers paradise" they have been sold by the Marxist demagogues in their bid for power. The demagogues rise to power. And when the jig is up, the "proletariat" gets stuck with the bill. Everyone who does not belong to the Politbureau will then suffer "equally" just as they wished.
I don't believe that any of the major political issues which have arisen prior to and including 9/11, from those ensuing wars to illegal immigration to the failing economy have happened in a vacuum or as the result of an accident.
When the time comes that the Globalist Banksters must pull the rug from beneath the "proletariat" suckers, you can be assured that the first means to be cut under "austerity" will be all the Social Programs that were used to entice the people to buy into the Marxist dream in the first place. And the people themselves will receive all the blame for the necessity of having to do so because of their sloth and etc.
There won't be a peep out of the Zionist media about those other factors which Griffin and Fitts have alluded to.