When Arabs brought terrorism to “Palestine”

[Magnus]

It's backed up all over the place. You are clearly no authority and have no idea what you are talking about.

In other words, you still can't back up your statement? Yup. Thought so. Thanks for playing.

 

[MartyNYC]

What exactly do you hope to prove by posting this over and over again? How on earth does it prove your case? I know you are a moron but still...

There never was a place known as Palestine by the indigenous Middle Eastern peoples, and there never was a place named Palestine founded by people named Palestinians.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Magnus keeps chattering like a mindless chipmunk.

He has been answered thoroughly, and he keeps acting like Gump.

 

[MartyNYC]

Magnus is ignoring that I answered that question. Jerusalem was pulled down by the Romans. He ignores that tens of thousands of Jews remained in country, studied the Torah, and waited for the home country that came 2,000 years later.

The Jews were always there and not replaced by "Palestinians."

Roman Emperor Caracalla, in 212 CE, granted Roman citizenship to Jews.

 

[Magnus]

There never was a place known as Palestine by the indigenous Middle Eastern peoples, and there never was a place named Palestine founded by people named Palestinians.

Poor poor MoronNYC. Proving that you can take a horse to water but you can't make him drink...

One more time...

Who Are the Palestinians?

Who Are the Palestinians? You may be familiar with modern-day Palestine, especially in regard to the conflict between Israel and Palestine. But who are the Palestinian people, and what is their history? The Palestinian people are Arabs who liveand have lived throughout historyin a certain...

www.pcrf.net

 

[MartyNYC]

Poor poor MoronNYC. Proving that you can take a horse to water but you can't make him drink...

One more time...

Who Are the Palestinians?

Who Are the Palestinians? You may be familiar with modern-day Palestine, especially in regard to the conflict between Israel and Palestine. But who are the Palestinian people, and what is their history? The Palestinian people are Arabs who liveand have lived throughout historyin a certain...

www.pcrf.net

The word “Palestinian” does not appear in Middle East records.

Arabs themselves laugh out loud: “When were there any palestinians?! Where?!”

 

[Magnus]

Roman Emperor Caracalla, in 212 CE, granted Roman citizenship to Jews.

Tut...tut. Fail again. Read and learn.

The Constitutio Antoniniana (lit. "Constitution of Antoninus", also called "Edict of Caracalla" or "Antonine Constitution") was an edict issued in 212 by Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given full Roman citizenship,[40] with the exception of the dediticii, people who had become subject to Rome through surrender in war, and freed slaves.[41][42][43][44][45]

Caracalla - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Now, prove that the Jewish people were free. Go.

 

[Magnus]

Magnus keeps chattering like a mindless chipmunk.

He has been answered thoroughly, and he keeps acting like Gump.

Hi Retard. You still can't prove your point, could you? Thought so. Now, shut up and sit down. Learn to read. Who knows, you may even learn something.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Hi Retard. You still can't prove your point, could you? Thought so. Now, shut up and sit down. Learn to read. Who knows, you may even learn something.

Minimus, you have just been so inadequate in this thread that people are laughing at you. But, fine, be as you are.

 

[MartyNYC]

Tut...tut. Fail again. Read and learn.

The Constitutio Antoniniana (lit. "Constitution of Antoninus", also called "Edict of Caracalla" or "Antonine Constitution") was an edict issued in 212 by Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given full Roman citizenship,[40] with the exception of the dediticii, people who had become subject to Rome through surrender in war, and freed slaves.[41][42][43][44][45]

Caracalla - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Now, prove that the Jewish people were free. Go.

Where were the Fakestinians?

 

[MartyNYC]

Tut...tut. Fail again. Read and learn.

The Constitutio Antoniniana (lit. "Constitution of Antoninus", also called "Edict of Caracalla" or "Antonine Constitution") was an edict issued in 212 by Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given full Roman citizenship,[40] with the exception of the dediticii, people who had become subject to Rome through surrender in war, and freed slaves.[41][42][43][44][45]

Caracalla - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Now, prove that the Jewish people were free. Go.

Renowned scholar of Roman history Professor Paula Fredriksen: Jews flourished in the Roman Empire…

“Roman government continued to respect the long-established ancestral practices of its Jewish subjects, as it customarily respected such practices of its other subject peoples. When Rome (perhaps in the late 120s) banned the practice of circumcision, Jews were exempted from the ban; slightly later, Antoninus Pius explicitly permitted circumcision to Jews, while banning it for non-Jews. Sometime between 196 and 211, the emperors Septimius Severus and Caracalla ruled that those Jews who served on town councils could exercise that office without performing liturgies" (those rites and ceremonies incumbent upon a councilor) that might "offend against their religion." And finally, when in 212 the emperor Caracalla universalized Roman citizenship, Jews (as many others) who had been citizens of their own cities became, also, citizens of the city of Rome”

“The archaeological record for the entire Roman period, both in the Diaspora and in the Land of Israel, both before Constantine and well after him, also reveals that many Jewish communities continued to thrive. Synagogue buildings are refurbished and new ones built, occasionally on a grand scale. Wealthy pagans continue to support and to sponsor local Jewish activities; Jewish citizens continue to hold offices in municipal and imperial government; Jewish funerary artifacts and inscriptions attest to the continued rootedness and social integration of these communities in their diaspora setting. And as compendia of late Roman law codes (and the occasional comments of irate orthodox bishops) attest, the legitimacy of Jewish holy books, prop-erty, and practices continues to be asserted, and Jews continue to be citizens of their cities and of the empire, well after the empire itself was Christian. The rhetoric of the adversus ludaeos tradition does not give us the measure of this social reality.”

 

[MartyNYC]

Tut...tut. Fail again. Read and learn.

The Constitutio Antoniniana (lit. "Constitution of Antoninus", also called "Edict of Caracalla" or "Antonine Constitution") was an edict issued in 212 by Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given full Roman citizenship,[40] with the exception of the dediticii, people who had become subject to Rome through surrender in war, and freed slaves.[41][42][43][44][45]

Caracalla - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Now, prove that the Jewish people were free. Go.

Jews were free. Now, even a mental midget like you knows. Still, no record of Fakestinians in the Roman Empire.

Eminent scholar of Roman/Jewish history E. Mary Smallwood, “The Jews Under Roman Rule”…

“Caracalla’s most famous measure was his issue of the Constitutio Antoniniana in 212, granting Roman citizenship to all the free inhabitants of the empire. A Greek translation of the edict preserved on a badly damaged papyrus excludes the deditici in some way from its scope. But literary references imply no exceptions to the general enfranchisement, and the majority opinion among scholars now appears to be that the main clause of the papyrus text confers Roman citizenship on all provincials without exception, and that the deditici are excluded only from the subsidiary provision which follows in a grammatically subordinate form--a provision which is a matter of debate, since most of it has disappeared in a lacuna. Thus all, or virtually all, Jews in the empire will presumably have come under the universal benefaction. For whatever precisely the exclusion of the deditici amounted to (even if it was exclusion from the citizen-ship), it is unlikely that any significant number of Jews fell into that category. If any in Palestine had been so degraded as punishment for Bar Cochba's revolt (a point on which there is no evidence), the status of dediticius was normally only temporary (except for criminal freedmen classified in numero dediticioram under the Lex Aelia Sentia), and they are likely to have regained normal provincial status long since. Caracalla's name Aurelius, assumed by the newly enfranchised, occurs quite frequently among Diaspora Jews.

Dio makes the purpose of the Constitutio Antoniniana the mundane one of increasing the number of people liable for taxes payable only by Roman citizens, to counterbalance Caracalla's extravagance.

According to the Greek text of that edict, however, its purpose was to enhance the prestige of the Roman gods, who had preserved Caracalla from some danger (the word is lost but the allusion is generally supposed to be to the alleged conspiracy against his life for which Geta was murdered), by increasing the number of their worshippers. Yet under the Constitutio the Jews were apparently treated on an absolute equality with other provincials, and were put under no disadvantage”

 

[Magnus]

Jews were free. Now, even a mental midget like you knows. Still, no record of Fakestinians in the Roman Empire.

Eminent scholar of Roman/Jewish history E. Mary Smallwood, “The Jews Under Roman Rule”…

“Caracalla’s most famous measure was his issue of the Constitutio Antoniniana in 212, granting Roman citizenship to all the free inhabitants of the empire. A Greek translation of the edict preserved on a badly damaged papyrus excludes the deditici in some way from its scope. But literary references imply no exceptions to the general enfranchisement, and the majority opinion among scholars now appears to be that the main clause of the papyrus text confers Roman citizenship on all provincials without exception, and that the deditici are excluded only from the subsidiary provision which follows in a grammatically subordinate form--a provision which is a matter of debate, since most of it has disappeared in a lacuna. Thus all, or virtually all, Jews in the empire will presumably have come under the universal benefaction. For whatever precisely the exclusion of the deditici amounted to (even if it was exclusion from the citizen-ship), it is unlikely that any significant number of Jews fell into that category. If any in Palestine had been so degraded as punishment for Bar Cochba's revolt (a point on which there is no evidence), the status of dediticius was normally only temporary (except for criminal freedmen classified in numero dediticioram under the Lex Aelia Sentia), and they are likely to have regained normal provincial status long since. Caracalla's name Aurelius, assumed by the newly enfranchised, occurs quite frequently among Diaspora Jews.

Dio makes the purpose of the Constitutio Antoniniana the mundane one of increasing the number of people liable for taxes payable only by Roman citizens, to counterbalance Caracalla's extravagance.

According to the Greek text of that edict, however, its purpose was to enhance the prestige of the Roman gods, who had preserved Caracalla from some danger (the word is lost but the allusion is generally supposed to be to the alleged conspiracy against his life for which Geta was murdered), by increasing the number of their worshippers. Yet under the Constitutio the Jews were apparently treated on an absolute equality with other provincials, and were put under no disadvantage”


View attachment 778995

LOL All them words... and yet... Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Remember, that was your original argument? That the Jews were still living in the land of Isreal even after being thrown out by the Romans?

Poor MoronNYC. Tries so hard and falls badly over and over again. My sympathies.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Magnus is such a twit. He has to accept the Jews are forever and the Arabs will assimilate or travel away from Greater Israel.

We Never Left: The Jews' Continuous Presence in the Land of Israel​

By LEE BENDER
Updated: DECEMBER 12, 2016 23:13

We Never Left: The Jews' Continuous Presence in the Land of Israel

www.jpost.com

 

[MartyNYC]

LOL All them words... and yet... Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Remember, that was your original argument? That the Jews were still living in the land of Isreal even after being thrown out by the Romans?

Poor MoronNYC. Tries so hard and falls badly over and over again. My sympathies.

Words from renowned scholars of Roman Jewish history: Jews were free and flourished in the Roman Empire…

 

[Magnus]

Words from renowned scholars of Roman Jewish history: Jews were free and flourished in the Roman Empire…


View attachment 779145View attachment 779146

What's the matter, MoronNYC? Having difficulty in reading and comprehension? Same response as before:

LOL All them words... and yet... Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Remember, that was your original argument? That the Jews were still living in the land of Isreal even after being thrown out by the Romans?

Keep trying, moron. All the best.

 

[MartyNYC]

What's the matter, MoronNYC? Having difficulty in reading and comprehension? Same response as before:

LOL All them words... and yet... Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Remember, that was your original argument? That the Jews were still living in the land of Isreal even after being thrown out by the Romans?

Keep trying, moron. All the best.

Jews lived freely throughout the Roman Empire and even thrived. Now, even you know!

Paula Fredriksen: “The archaeological record for the entire Roman period, both in the Diaspora and in the Land of Israel, both before Constantine and well after him, also reveals that many Jewish communities continued to thrive. Synagogue buildings are refurbished and new ones built, occasionally on a grand scale.”

No record, however, of any Fakestinians.

 

[Magnus]

Jews lived freely throughout the Roman Empire and even thrived. Now, even you know!

No record, however, of any Fakestinians.

Same question, moron...

Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Did you really think you can snowball me with a lot of junk notes and I will somehow forget my question?

 

[MartyNYC]

Same question, moron...

Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Did you really think you can snowball me with a lot of junk notes and I will somehow forget my question

You’re brain-dead.

Paula Fredriksen: “The archaeological record for the entire Roman period, both in the Diaspora and in the Land of Israel, both before Constantine and well after him, also reveals that many Jewish communities continued to thrive. Synagogue buildings are refurbished and new ones built, occasionally on a grand scale.”

No record of Fakestinians.

 

[Magnus]

You’re brain-dead.

Paula Fredriksen: “The archaeological record for the entire Roman period, both in the Diaspora and in the Land of Israel, both before Constantine and well after him, also reveals that many Jewish communities continued to thrive. Synagogue buildings are refurbished and new ones built, occasionally on a grand scale.”

No record of Fakestinians.

Same question, moron...

Where does it say that the Jews lived in Jerusalem during the time the Romans supposedly gave them their freedom?

Did you really think you can snowball me with a lot of junk notes and I will somehow forget my question?