What’s the deal with far left Democrats? Will they use transgender’s, feminine type men as bodyguards and in the front lines of war?

That was the discussion here.

They Want Big, Strapping Men!” - Women Don’t Call Betas When Trouble Strikes​




Completely serious thing. We see all the Democrats here keep talking about things like transgender‘s, LGBT rights. OK it is right to talk about equal rights for all in our country to strive for a better country.

But We see them(The far left, anarchists antifa) get mad when Americans have questions about how our society has changed and how we will deal with this.

The question that can be asked of these folks is what kind of country do you want? OK democrats say what you’ll say. Are you democrats seeing women being used as bodyguards for the vice president? Are you seeing feminine type men being used as bodyguards for the vice president or for the president? . Are you seeing feminine type men being use in the front lines of our military?

Notice how often from the far left, there’s never an answer for this. They simply look at the headline and just lose it. They’ll say things like “why do you care about peoples private lives” or something similar . we’re not talking about private lives here. We’re talking about our country. So to all the Democrats answer the questions. Respond to the points being made in the video above.

This simply comes down to one thing it is as follows , when it comes to applying to be a secret Service agent or a bodyguard for the president or Vice President . And when it comes to fighting on the front lines in our military,

Should males and females have to pass the same test or should a different test be given to a female or a transgender man or transgender woman?



anyone capable of doing the job should be allowed the opportunity to apply for it.


if the job has a dress code it should be met.
 
So when it comes to applying for the job for the Secret Service. And when it comes to fighting on the front lines in our military.,

should males and females have to pass the same test or should a different test be given to a female or a transgender man or transgender woman?

same test.
 
Increasing numbers? You guys have scoured the country, and the only one you have found is the Cole chick, who seems like she's a whole bag of crazy.
Another, and its just starting.


young detransitioned woman is seeking justice from the medical group and hospital that facilitated her medical transition between the ages of 12 to 17, which included puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and a double mastectomy at just 13 years old.
 
young detransitioned woman is seeking justice from the medical group and hospital that facilitated her medical transition between the ages of 12 to 17, which included puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and a double mastectomy at just 13 years old.

Yawn.... two cases out of hundreds of thousands of cases.

Here's a hint. We aren't getting Kaiser's side because HIPAA prevents them from releasing her full medical records.
 
These ^^^ fvckers are the same people that LOVED M*A*S*H but would despise it today.

You do understand, don't you, that the point of the Klinger character was that he was trying to make himself look crazy, hoping to get a Section Eight discharge?

Your fucked-up side is now trying to tell us that much crazier behavior than that in which Klinger was depicted to engage, in order to try to convince people that he was crazy, is now sane, proper, and acceptable.

Nothing about M*A*S*H helps your point at all.

1679109683890.png
 
You do understand, don't you, that the point of the Klinger character was that he was trying to make himself look crazy, hoping to get a Section Eight discharge?

Your fucked-up side is now trying to tell us that much crazier behavior than that in which Klinger was depicted to engage, in order to try to convince people that he was crazy, is now sane, proper, and acceptable.

Nothing about M*A*S*H helps your point at all.
I totally understand Klingers Reasoning.
The point...... read slowly..... is that RWI's LOVED the Show in 1980, but IFIFIFIFIF it was never shown in 1980, but only in 2023, then you RWI's would be going ballistic.
 
I totally understand Klingers [sic] Reasoning.
The point...... read slowly..... is that RWI's LOVED the Show in 1980, but IFIFIFIFIF it was never shown in 1980, but only in 2023, then you RWI's would be going ballistic.

You seem to be under the delusion that you have a point to make, here. You have nothing.

You're trying to confound our enjoyment entertainment in the form of a fictional character behaving in an insane manner in a ploy to convince his peers that he's mentally ill; with our disgust at actual crazies engaging in insane behavior in a manner that is overtly harmful, and especially with crazies who drag children into their sick perversions.
 
Last edited:
You seem to be under the delusion that you have a point to make, here. You have nothing.

You're trying to confound our enjoyment entertainment in the form of a fictional character behaving in an insane manner in a ploy to convince his peers that he's mentally ill; with our disgust at actual crazies engaging in insane behavior in a manner that is overtly harmful, and especially with crazies who drag children into their sick perversions.

Speaking of fictional characters. If you are living around people living like that, I suggest you wake the F up, you are dreaming. Now whether it's a nightmare of a wet dream, that's up to you. But how about you leave the rest of us out of of your fantasy.
 
You do understand, don't you, that the point of the Klinger character was that he was trying to make himself look crazy, hoping to get a Section Eight discharge?

Your fucked-up side is now trying to tell us that much crazier behavior than that in which Klinger was depicted to engage, in order to try to convince people that he was crazy, is now sane, proper, and acceptable.

Nothing about M*A*S*H helps your point at all.
They will also point to bugs bunny and Mrs doubtfire, not realizing that the entire point of both was the ridiculousness and humor in it. If those characters were made today with the same intention, they fail to understand that there would be riots from the trans activists.

There is humor in Elmer Fudd falling for a male bugs bunny because bugs is wearing women's clothes. Today, the loony left would insist that Elmer sees bugs as an actual female and be pissed if Elmer didn't want to play with bug bunny's womanly dick.
 
Last edited:
In the "before times", also know as the normal times, they would be making comedy movies and sketches about this. An obviously male "woman" trying to sleep with a hetero male talking of how they really are a woman etc. But that is now verboten.
 
I totally understand Klingers Reasoning.
The point...... read slowly..... is that RWI's LOVED the Show in 1980, but IFIFIFIFIF it was never shown in 1980, but only in 2023, then you RWI's would be going ballistic.

Actually, MASH would never create a character like Klinger today because he would be offensive to the Trans community.

Even the show realized the character was offensive, and later rewrote him to be a normal soldier who was a bit of a wheeler-dealer. Also, like most of that show, the gag got old really fast. It was a show that lasted 11 years set in a war that only lasted 3.

They will also point to bugs bunny and Mrs doubtfire, not realizing that the entire point of both was the ridiculousness and humor in it. If those characters were made today with the same intention, they fail to understand that there would be riots from the trans activists.

There is humor in Elmer Fudd falling for a male bugs bunny because bugs is wearing women's clothes. Today, the loony left would insist that Elmer sees bugs as an actual female and be pissed if Elmer didn't want to play with bug bunny's womanly dick.

Hey, do you know what else they used to do on Looney Tune cartoons? They used to have characters in blackface.

images
images
images


Today, everyone agrees that this was completely offensive and these catroons have largely been taken out of circulation.

The point we make about Bugs in Drag is not that it wasn't offensive (it was) but that the right's insistence that if little Timmy sees a drag queen reading a story, his first reaction is going to be to run home and ask his parents to cut off his pee-pee.
 
In the "before times", also know as the normal times, they would be making comedy movies and sketches about this. An obviously male "woman" trying to sleep with a hetero male talking of how they really are a woman etc. But that is now verboten.

As it should be. Just like characters like Step N' Fetchit aren't acceptable anymore.

Just like having white actors put on yellowface and squint a lot and be called Asians isn't acceptable anymore.

Just like the lisping, flamboyant gay stereotype is no longer acceptable for comic effect isn't acceptable anymore.
 
Yawn.... two cases out of hundreds of thousands of cases.

Here's a hint. We aren't getting Kaiser's side because HIPAA prevents them from releasing her full medical records.
Dhillon says she receives 'thousands of calls from people all over the country' who want to sue healthcare providers for bungled trans care, but that 'unfortunately, most are beyond the statute of limitations
 

Forum List

Back
Top