Mrs. M.
Man Feed Guest Writer
- Nov 2, 2015
- 739
- 393
- 940
"AMERIZUELA"
After reading many articles written by mainstream media which described Chavez as a tyrannical socialist dictator oppressing the poor in Venezuela, I decided to search for the other side of the story. After all, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State at the time. It wouldn't be the first time the media had covered up the truth. I learned that Chavez was adamantly opposed to the NWO and was an outspoken critic of Hillary Clinton's close friend and mentor, Henry Kissinger. A former army colonel stated that Hugo Chavez was not an a Socialist. That he was he was an enemy of the struggle for socialism. This statement is a complete contradiction of what mainstream media has written about Hugo Chavez.
With that, here is the other side of the story as presented by Mark Weisbrot:
Mark Weistbrot wrote:
The New York Times, for its part, ran yet another hate piece on its op-ed page. Dog bites man. Nothing new here, they have doing this for almost 14 years – most recently just three months ago. This one was remarkably unoriginal, comparing the Chávez government to a Latin American magical realist novel. It contained very little information – but being fact-free allowed the authors to claim that the country had “dwindling productivity” and “an enormous foreign debt load.” Productivity has not “dwindled” under Chávez; in fact real GDP per capita, which is mostly driven by productivity growth, expanded by 24 percent since 2004. (For an explanation of why 2004 is a reasonable starting point, see here.) In the 20 years prior to Chávez, real GDP per person actually fell. As for the “enormous foreign debt load,” Venezuela’s foreign public debt is about 28 percent of GDP, and the interest on it is about 2 percent of GDP. If this is enormous – well, let’s just say these people don’t have a good sense of quantity.
The authors were probably just following a general rule, which is that you can say almost anything you want about Venezuela, so long as it is bad – and it usually goes unquestioned. Statistics and data count for very little when the media is presenting its ugly picture. - end quote
Venezuela Hate-Fest
Turning his attention to yet another American News Source the author writes:
This is especially true for Jon Lee Anderson, writing in the January 28 issue of the New Yorker (“Slumlord: What has Hugo Chávez wrought in Venezuela?”). He mentions in passing that “the poorest Venezuelans are marginally better off these days.” Marginally? From 2004-2011, extreme poverty was reduced by about two-thirds. Poverty was reduced by about one-half, and this measures only cash income. It does not count the access to health care that millions now have, or the doubling of college enrollment – with free tuition for many. Access to public pensions tripled. Unemployment is half of what it was when Chávez took office. -end quote
Whether we approve or not of Chavez's anti-semitism and his opinion of Israel (I don't approve) it does appear that he was well liked by the poor in his country and the country was doing well under his leadership without UN / NATO assistance which perhaps is why the CIA led a failed coup d' etat against him in 2002. The timing appears to have coincided with a slow down in the Venezuelan economy which recovered after Chavez won the recall referendum:
Caracas, Venezuela during Hugo Chavez Presidency
Hugo Chávez died on March 5 2013. He was President of Venezuela between February 1999 and March 2013. His long hold on power was a result of the 4 elections in which he won by clear majorities. There is little disputing the fact that his main base of support came from the poorest layers of Venezuelan society and there is a good case to be made that his period in power saw some improvement in their condition (according to the World Bank the desperately poor in Venezuela has declined from 23% to 9% of the population).
Anyone reading the more ridiculous comments of the neo-liberal right would be pushed into a positive picture of a benevolent, socially concerned man of the people. When US papers accuse him of monopolising the media or recklessly increasing Venezuela’s debt burden we can only laugh. There are plenty of Berlusconi’s or Murdochs in the West and Venezuela’s debt burden is still much less than any of the G20 powers reeling from the collapse of 2008. To the open supporters of capitalism we have no more to say. A much more dangerous myth has to be countered: the widely-held belief that Chávez and ‘Chavismo’ represented real socialism.
Hugo Chávez: Neither Socialist Nor Anti-Imperialist | Leftcom
The comparison between the Chavez presidency and Socialist President Manduro's are stark - judging by the state of the economy, inflation rate, poverty rate and astronomical rise in crime...
"What's Happening in Venezuela?"
2016: Caracas, Venezuela named as the world's most violent city
This looks quite different from Venezuela during Chavez Presidency!
Why does the mainstream media in the United States refuse to report one of the most important stories of our time? It happened under Clinton's watch as Secretary of State. This is what has happened to Venezuela after Hugo Chavez died and the Socialist President Manduro who replaced him was installed. While I do not agree with Mr. Chavez's anti-semitism, it is quite clear that Venezuela was far better off under his leadership than it is today under Socialist President Manduro. Was there a second coup d' etat against Chavez which led to his death and the installation of this Socialist Tyrant who is now using military force and starvation to control the people of Venezuela? If so, it was another Clinton Coup d' etat. This might explain their not reporting what is happening in Venezuela now.
Venezuelan Journalist Rightly Wonders Why American Media Ignores Unfolding Crisis
A Venezuelan woman and her children suffer because of the current Socialist regime that was installed after President Hugo Chavez died. This poor mother and her children! What a tragic picture and it is the same all over Venezuela!
Last but not least we have this final report on Venezuela...
Dave Hodges reports:
Venezuelans are in search of anything they can eat. Despite having one of the world’s richest oil reserves, dogs, cats, and pigeons are in danger. Soon, there will be only thing left to eat, each other! America is following the same path. At the center of it all is Hillary Clinton. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was responsible for the unfolding starvation holocaust in Venezuela with regard to her role as Secretary of State. Venezuela is on the verge of a human holocaust due to a lack of food caused by Clinton’s actions against then Venezuelan leader, Hugo Chavez.
Hillary Clinton deserves all comparisons to Hitler, Stalin and Mao. Even as the Secretary of State, she has demonstrated a gross disdain for the sovereignty of any nation. In these emails, Clinton is demonstrating the kind of sociopathic behavior possessed by all mass murderers. With regard to her actions in Venezuela, she has not only earned her title as the Butcher of Benghazi, she has far exceeded that label.
The reader now has the ability to access Clinton’s recently leaked emails that demonstrates her propensity to become one of the greatest mass murderers in World History should she ever gain the power of the US Presidency.
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Clinton-Emails-Reveal-Direct-US-Sabotage-of-Venezuela-20160726-0041.html …
Clinton Emails Reveal Direct US Sabotage of VenezuelaControl oil and you control nations, control food and you control the people.
- Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
What's cooking in Clinton's Cauldron?
AMERIZUELA!
AMERIZUELA!
2016:Caracas, Venezuela named as the world's most violent city
Trump: The U.S. Will Become ‘Another Venezuela’ if Clinton Wins in November
Trump: If Hillary wins, 'we will be a large-scale version of Venezuela'
CIA's Cancer Weapons
US dismisses claims that CIA gave Chávez cancer as 'absurd'
Clinton Is Responsible for the Venezuelan Mass Starvation
Clinton Emails Reveal Direct US Sabotage of Venezuela
Last edited: