What you must believe to think Biden is innocent.

[badger2]

The Deep State and Its Discontents: Failure to Investigate

It's too late to dumb down the hostage reading population. When Hunter introduced Metabiota to Burisma, deputy Secretary of State Miss Pigtoria Nuland could not have been anything but pleased.

 

[badger2]

The handshakes are totally legal as well.

 

[rightwinger]

In order to believe that Biden is innocent of taking bribes for favorable foreign policy decisions, we must ignore his own words, his son’s text messages and emails, all the “spontaneous” meetings, all the whistleblowers and witnesses, and the need for more than 20 shell companies to launder and distribute loot among family members who have no demonstrable skills. Finally, we must believe that $20 million — and probably much more — has been lavished on all of these people except the only one possessed of the power to make it rain.

You are shooting blanks Skippy

You can’t show a single meeting where Joe Biden discussed business
You can’t show any money going to Joe Biden
You can’t show any favors


As usual, you fail

 

[Lisa558]

Great. And what part of earning $20 million and giving some to your family members is illegal?

It wasn’t “earned.” Bribes are illegal.

 

[bripat9643]

Few living in the real world believe that.

There is no credible evidence of that wild theory. Leading Republican opponents are on the record saying your claims are crazed.

There is a mountain of credible evidence, moron.

 

[Marener]

It wasn’t “earned.” Bribes are illegal.

You can’t bribe someone after they left office.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

There is a mountain of credible evidence, moron.

Really?



not of what you people allege. Not even Comer or Jordan (or the other whackos), say there's real evidence. If they had any they could send it over to the DOJ recommending a prosecution.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

There is a mountain of credible evidence, moron.

and as far as in impeachment? GOP Senators are already on record saying they see nothing there.

We have an inquiry because, they need to go hunting for evidence they don't have.

 

[White 6]

Impeachment ain't a court. And the Repubs have a shitload of actual evidence already

More power to ya.

 

[bripat9643]

Really?



not of what you people allege. Not even Comer or Jordan (or the other whackos), say there's real evidence. If they had any they could send it over to the DOJ recommending a prosecution.

Yes, really, you ******* dumbass.

Pull your head out of your ass.

 

[bripat9643]

and as far as in impeachment? GOP Senators are already on record saying they see nothing there.

We have an inquiry because, they need to go hunting for evidence they don't have.

How would they get bank records without a Congressional subpeona?

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Yes, really, you ******* dumbass.

Pull your head out of your ass.

Fact: No evidence exists for what you claim. No criminal prosecution, and most likely a doomed trial, by the Senate

 

[Dante Reawakened]

How would they get bank records without a Congressional subpeona?

What banks records have they gotten? It's a congressional subpoena. Go look it up. It's not a criminal subpoena from a court.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Tautology.

You aren’t using logic. You’re following a narrative.

Is everyone at the State Dept lying about wanting to get Shokin fired?

Who is “everyone” that’s a Lib talking point. Again the timing is suspicious to logical people.

 

[Lisa558]

How would they get bank records without a Congressional subpeona?

We will finally be able to force the DOJ to stop blocking the investigation.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

We will finally be able to force the DOJ to stop blocking the investigation.

You don't understand anything here.

What Republicans ignored congressional subpoenas?


"In addition to McCarthy, three other lawmakers were referred for defying subpoenas: Reps. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.). Another GOP member who ignored the summons, Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, is leaving Congress after this year and will be out of the ethics panel's reach."

 

[Marener]

Who is “everyone” that’s a Lib talking point. Again the timing is suspicious to logical people.

Pyatt. Nuland. Kent. You know, the people you claimed to have read the testimony of.

What timing? The timing with the investigation that Shokin claims he was doing despite no corroborating evidence.

Seems like it might have been made up well after the fact.

 

[Marener]

We will finally be able to force the DOJ to stop blocking the investigation.

How?

 

[Nostra]

What banks records have they gotten? It's a congressional subpoena. Go look it up. It's not a criminal subpoena from a court.

Moroner says the bank records show nothing, so he obviously has seen them.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Moroner says the bank records show nothing, so he obviously has seen them.

Nope. Banks records don't and won't show what you Magadonian mongoloids believe they do or will.