What Would Be So Awful About Overturning Roe v. Wade & Saving Unborn Children's Lives?

[Asclepias]

So a 14 year old girl on life support has no “right to life”?

When it depends on the life of another? What do you think?

I think you’re a special sort of bat-shit crazy when you believe the extermination of humans is the perfect solution to anyone who finds that life to be a mild inconvenience.

You thought a fetus was an adult female too so no one really takes what you think seriously.

 

[P@triot]

Absolutely. What does that have to do with anything?

Does a woman?

Absolutely. Just like the man who shoots himself when he’s not carrying another human, so can a woman.

If a man didn’t that with another person between him and the gun - it would be called what it is: murder.

 

[P@triot]

You thought a fetus was an adult female too so no one really takes what you think seriously.

In other words, you just got your ass handed to you by me yet again. And now you’re running for the hills.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I think you’re a special sort of bat-shit crazy when you believe the extermination of humans is the perfect solution to anyone who finds that life to be a mild inconvenience.

And, I think you are quite inconsistent in your convictions.

Does one person have the right to the free, involuntary labor and services of another? Does one have the right to use the body of another?

 

[Asclepias]

Correct?!? You believe a newborn has no right to life?!?

I believe no human has the right to depend on another against the other's will.



That's called involuntary servitude.

So parents can kill their toddlers because their toddlers are enslaving them? Even though it was the parents who brought that child into the world.

Thank you, now I know you're just playing games here.

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

 

[P@triot]

It would pry open a woman's body and declare it state property.

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Absolutely. Just like the man who shoots himself when he’s not carrying another human, so can a woman.

If a man didn’t that with another person between him and the gun - it would be called what it is: murder.

The inconsistency and lack of principle is GLARING!

 

[Asclepias]

You thought a fetus was an adult female too so no one really takes what you think seriously.

In other words, you just got your ass handed to you by me yet again. And now you’re running for the hills.

Says the guy that claimed a fetus was an adult female. You sure you want to stick with that claim?

 

[P@triot]

And, I think you are quite inconsistent in your convictions.

Sadly, I’m the only one between us who is consistent.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

 

[P@triot]

Absolutely. Just like the man who shoots himself when he’s not carrying another human, so can a woman.

If a man didn’t that with another person between him and the gun - it would be called what it is: murder.

The inconsistency and lack of principle is GLARING!

So is you’re inability to make a coherent argument. A woman has every right to take her own life just as a man. She doesn’t have the right to take someone’s else’s life, snowflake. And a baby is a completely and separate life. DNA proves it.

 

[Asclepias]

And, I think you are quite inconsistent in your convictions.

Sadly, I’m the only one between us who is consistent.

You do consistently prove to be less intelligent than most. I mean I knew you were dumb but claiming a fetus is an adult female is pushing the limits.

 

[buttercup]

Correct?!? You believe a newborn has no right to life?!?

I believe no human has the right to depend on another against the other's will.



That's called involuntary servitude.

So parents can kill their toddlers because their toddlers are enslaving them? Even though it was the parents who brought that child into the world.

Thank you, now I know you're just playing games here.

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

You're clearly not following this conversation. He claimed that no human being has a right to be dependent on another.

 

[P@triot]

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

Botney just did. Try and keep up son.

 

[Asclepias]

Nobody is allowed to kill you - and you’re not “state property”. You’ll have to do a lot better than that, snowflake.

Is another person allowed to use my body against my will?

Am I allowed to continue to have sex with a woman after she changes her mind?

 

[buttercup]

And, I think you are quite inconsistent in your convictions.

Sadly, I’m the only one between us who is consistent.

You do consistently prove to be less intelligent than most. I mean I knew you were dumb but claiming a fetus is and adult female is pushing the limits.

lol. The irony. You don't even understand this conversation.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Sadly, I’m the only one between us who is consistent.

Really?

You seem to be quite statist in demanding that government has such extreme power over a woman. In other areas, you seem libertarian.

I suspect that you pick and choose when it comes to liberty.

I do not.

Why do you give a **** about some unborn kid that you will never see, but may be forced to support (which is also wrong) when the idiot birthing that bastard is yet another worthless human being incapable of her own survival?

 

[Asclepias]

Correct?!? You believe a newborn has no right to life?!?

I believe no human has the right to depend on another against the other's will.



That's called involuntary servitude.

So parents can kill their toddlers because their toddlers are enslaving them? Even though it was the parents who brought that child into the world.

Thank you, now I know you're just playing games here.

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

You're clearly not following this conversation. He claimed that no human being has a right to be dependent on another.

Youre clearly not understanding english. Being dependent has nothing to do with killing.

 

[WEATHER53]

I asked you a question in post 164. Evidently you don't have the cojones to answer it.

Your opinion is not a question. Its simply a misguided opinion I have already shown you was wrong.

It absolutely was a question in post 164, liar. You just don't want to answer it because you know you'll get caught in your BS.

Go back to sleep or get a better point. Claiming a woman shouldnt have control over own ******* body is pretty stupid.

For the umpteenth time, there are TWO bodies, Einstein. Repeating your lies doesn't make them any more true.

One of the bodies is inside the body of the woman and its unwanted. The woman has the right to get it out.

Pretty good view
If I though it was alive (which to me is survival outside the woman) then I would be against it. With the laws as to time frame I am less clear but a month or two just isn’t going to make it.
It’s a potential future baby and living thing but not a current one.
Repeat abortions are not common but I dont have the stats. So maybe for now and future one within X months is allowed but any 2nd or 3rd request could be entirely different?

 

[Asclepias]

False equivalence yet again. No one said parents can kill toddlers. .

Botney just did. Try and keep up son.

Show us where Botney said parents could kill their toddlers. Is this like when you claimed a fetus was an adult female?