What will you do when they arrest Trump ?

[Marener]

Yeah, he did. They were HIS personal troops. Trump allowed them to be killed. Over 200 of them. One quarter of the entire force at that time. Obummer would have NEVER attacked his masters troops that way.


DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

His “personal” troops?

That means nothing. Totally made up.

Putin doesn’t have a problem getting tens of thousands of his troops killed in Ukraine.

Trump was not part of anything in this episode.

 

[westwall]

His “personal” troops?

That means nothing. Totally made up.

Putin doesn’t have a problem getting tens of thousands of his troops killed in Ukraine.

Trump was not part of anything in this episode.

Look up The Wagner Group, retard. Yes, pootins personal troops. Trump ALLOWED US troops to kill them.

Obummer never did.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

 

[Marener]

Trump ALLOWED US troops to kill them.

Did they ask Trump’s permission before doing so?

 

[theHawk]

Over 300 classified documents recovered during raid of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago

Officials are investigating whether Trump illegally took documents from the White House after losing the 2021 presidential election

metro.co.uk

Will you respect the work of keeping America secure from traitors ?
or
Will you polish up your guns and kill some cops ?
or
Will you squat on your couch , watch Fox and burble about Hillary,Hunter and stuff ?

You havent got long to think about this.

Keep dreaming, fatboy.

 

[westwall]

Did they ask Trump’s permission before doing so?

Of course. They are called "rules of engagement". Obummer NEVER allowed US troops to engage them.

 

[Marener]

Of course. They are called "rules of engagement". Obummer NEVER allowed US troops to engage them.

Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.

You realize that’s why the engaged the Russian troops, right? The Russians mistakenly attacked our position.

 

[westwall]

Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.

You realize that’s why the engaged the Russian troops, right? The Russians mistakenly attacked our position.

No, they don't. You should read more about what shit our troops had to put up with.

"President Barack Obama appeared on board with this idea when, in December 2009, he announced a surge of 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, bringing the total to record high of 100,000 for an 18-month window to beat back the Taliban before a withdrawal commenced. But the deployment of overwhelming force came with a catch, courtesy of Gen. Stanley McChrystal. McChrystal subscribed to the once immensely popular idea that counterinsurgencies aren’t won by stacking bodies, but rather by winning over the “hearts and minds” of the civilian population — which means doing everything possible to avoid killing innocent people, among whom insurgents tend to eat, sleep, hide, and launch attacks. Troops were no longer allowed to employ firepower — airstrikes, guided-rocket attacks, artillery barrages, mortar fire, and even their personal rifles — if doing so would endanger the life of a non-combatant. Anyone who wasn’t carrying a weapon or planting a bomb was considered a non-combatant."

What Mattis’ New Rules Of Engagement Mean For The War In Afghanistan

taskandpurpose.com

 

[Marener]

Anyone who wasn’t carrying a weapon or planting a bomb was considered a non-combatant."

Setting aside the very different circumstances that they were in, do you think Russian soldiers carry weapons?

 

[westwall]

Setting aside the very different circumstances that they were in, do you think Russian soldiers carry weapons?

Not allowed to employ even their rifle if they might injure a non combatant.



DURRRRR

 

[BWK]

Come take them, man lover.

They already are. They're over here instead, doing the work your sorry ass won't do. What goes around comes around.

 

[BWK]

You liars spew that crap like you were actually there. Liars all.

Anybody who would do and say this, will do the other; Billy Bush says infamous 'grab them by the p***y' comments came from Trump

 

[Marener]

Not allowed to employ even their rifle if they might injure a non combatant.



DURRRRR

And you think the Russians shelling their positions and advancing in tanks were non-combatants? Not sure what you’re getting at here.

 

[BWK]

You mean like you are now, liar?

In what way exactly?

 

[BWK]

View attachment 687194

Um, your counter argument is?

 

[BWK]

Probably the one federal crime a former president CAN'T be charged with.

But you stupid clods will believe anything they shovel down your throats.

Why?

 

[BWK]

Probably the one federal crime a former president CAN'T be charged with.

But you stupid clods will believe anything they shovel down your throats.

Elaborate? What are you talking about? Do you know?

 

[toobfreak]

Rules of engagement always allow our troops to defend themselves.

Hey idiot: many of our troops in places like Afghanistan have DIED because they were attacked and could not respond back defending themselves (or attack an obvious target) in time without first contacting central command to talk to their lawyers and get permission first.

That's part of how our men were killed in Benghazi.

 

[BWK]

Keep dreaming, fatboy.

Keep dreaming about what? The FbI has the stolen classified documents.

 

[BWK]

Hey idiot: many of our troops in places like Afghanistan have DIED because they were attacked and could not respond back defending themselves (or attack an obvious target) in time without first contacting central command to talk to their lawyers and get permission first.

That's part of how our men were killed in Benghazi.

They talked to their lawyers first? Explain with links please?

 

[BWK]

No, they don't. You should read more about what shit our troops had to put up with.

"President Barack Obama appeared on board with this idea when, in December 2009, he announced a surge of 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, bringing the total to record high of 100,000 for an 18-month window to beat back the Taliban before a withdrawal commenced. But the deployment of overwhelming force came with a catch, courtesy of Gen. Stanley McChrystal. McChrystal subscribed to the once immensely popular idea that counterinsurgencies aren’t won by stacking bodies, but rather by winning over the “hearts and minds” of the civilian population — which means doing everything possible to avoid killing innocent people, among whom insurgents tend to eat, sleep, hide, and launch attacks. Troops were no longer allowed to employ firepower — airstrikes, guided-rocket attacks, artillery barrages, mortar fire, and even their personal rifles — if doing so would endanger the life of a non-combatant. Anyone who wasn’t carrying a weapon or planting a bomb was considered a non-combatant."

What Mattis’ New Rules Of Engagement Mean For The War In Afghanistan

taskandpurpose.com

Iraq and Afghanistan wars were a shit show propped up by lies, Obama inherited. Obama would have never invaded those countries to begin with, except we were still partially there, so his goal was to try and stabilize the insurgency from ISIS. And where did ISIS come from? Take a look; The Secret History of ISIS | FRONTLINE