What was Biden's Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle busy with? DEI

I've been to three Trump rally's... every building in eyesight of each event had agents on the rooftops... so you tell me what went wrong...
I'm not the best marksmen... I served with much better shooters than myself... but I could have made that shot with an M-16...
Way to close to not be covered...

Which brings us back to Trump's having asked for more SS detail several times and Biden's DOJ turning him down.
 
Actually Jack, based on the layout of the fairgrounds, stated distance of the shooter by the SS and photos of the shooter's body on the roof, my guess is that the shooter was omn the roof of one of these two restrooms.

View attachment 977495

As restrooms, they would have remained open and available to anyone, and a guy walking into it would not have drawn any attention. There must have been a door or something leading to the roof. I'm not sure the SS could have done much to stop this except maybe finding these doors and locking them, but as you can see, there were a lot of buildings and maybe they needed access to the roof left open for another reason, or maybe the kid went up there hours earlier and broke the lock.

My only complaint is that in the future, they should not use a place (and normally don't) with so many building around from which a shooter might shoot from, but then, most assassination attempts happen in close range using a handgun. But you can bet it won't happen again.
If that's the case, it looks even worse that his Secret Service team didn't secure all the immediate rooftops.
 
You'll have to ask his Secret Service team and their leader. They are responsible for his security and safety.
A massive blunder.
We haven't even heard from the Secret Service yet... so you tell me what's going on.... a hand picked friend of Jill Biden is the Secret Service chief?..... wake up we aren't stupid....
 
If that's the case, it looks even worse that his Secret Service team didn't secure all the immediate rooftops.

Probably so, but I have to wonder why such ideal rooftops were left without a SS sniper on them and my only conclusion is because they were restrooms and maybe there was some reason, some conflict, other need or something. The guy who saw the shooter and tried to warn the police said that from where the cops were, they couldn't see that rooftop.

Also, I've heard Trump had asked for more detail and was turned down by the DOJ, so maybe it was a shortage of personal for a place with so many buildings.

Bottom line is that it is not likely a situation that will be allowed to happen again. The downside is that we may have seen the last of the open rallies with a candidate standing in the open with crowds all around him.

My guess is that in the future, Trump is going to be surrounded by bulletproof glass. Shame.
 
The Left always like to use sex and skin color to deny more qualified people jobs and opportunities.



And we got a glimpse of SS DEI in action:




IMG_7297_jpeg-3266780.webp
 
The Left always like to use sex and skin color to deny more qualified people jobs and opportunities.



And we got a glimpse of SS DEI in action:




But they put their sunglasses on pretty good. Not as good as Joey bribem, but he has decades of experience.
 
Charlie Kirk:

No one was fired for spying on Trump.

No one was fired for the Russia Hoax.

No one was fired for the botched Afghanistan withdrawal.

No one was fired for lying about Hunter’s laptop.

Will anyone be fired for President Trump getting shot?
 
For a full minute authorities knew.

A timeline needs to be released to the public by next week on the failures to do their job. Not a year from now as we all know what will happen if ever.

 
The McKinsey studies used to validate this DEI nonsense have been debunked.

However, Green, from Mays School of Business at Texas A&M University, and Hand, from Kenan-Flagler Business School at UNC–Chapel Hill, applied McKinsey’s methodology to large public US companies in the S&P 500 and found no statistically significant links between its measures of diversity and either industry-adjusted earning before interest and tax, or sales growth, gross margin, return on assets, return on equity and total shareholder return over the prior five years (2015 to 2019 – the same pre-Covid time window used in McKinsey’s studies between 2015 and 2020).

“Our results indicate that despite the imprimatur often given to McKinsey’s 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2023 studies, McKinsey’s studies neither conceptually (in terms of the correct direction of causality) nor empirically (in terms of their set of large US public firms) support the argument that large US public firms can expect on average to deliver improved financial performance if they increase the racial/ethnic diversity of their executives,” the research finds.


While it's good that this is finally coming out, it's likely that there is actually a strong negative correlation between forced diversity and performance. Would like to see a valid study based on the last three years vs. pre-2015, the date of the first bullshit "study".

Just another ridiculous liberal policy that anybody with common sense would know is harmful.
 
Back
Top Bottom