What the Right Wing Disinformation Machine Got Wrong About Brown U Shooting: Everything

[citygator]

So now that Ella Cook was just the 15,000th victim of gun violence this year and not the second or third victim of left wing violence or the 30th of right wing violence the right wing outrage machine no longer cares about her death. Her twitter mentions plummeted once the shooter and his motivations became known.

This brings us to account for what the right wing disinformation machine got wrong about the Brown Shooting: EVERYTHING

It's remarkable how badly the RW accounts that ginned up hysteria around the Brown shooting were wrong about everything both on social media and on here.

• The killer did not shout "Allahu Akbar!" - started by Sayaras
• The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by DonGlock26 and Votto
• The killer did not shoot up that economics class because it was taught by a Jewish professor.
• The killer did not shoot up Brown because of its Israel policies - started by Robert Urbanek
• The killer was not a Palestinian student, or Muslim. Suggested by so many people its hard to @ them all.
• Brown University did not cover up evidence related to the killing in an attempt to protect a political hit or one of its students. Wild Bill Kelsoe
• Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor, was not killed because he was Jewish or made pro-Israel statements. In fact, there's no evidence he was Jewish.
• Their conspiracy theories were fabricated and were wrong from top to bottom.

 

[Hafar1014]

So now that Ella Cook was just the 15,000th victim of gun violence this year and not the second or third victim of left wing violence or the 30th of right wing violence the right wing outrage machine no longer cares about her death. Her twitter mentions plummeted once the shooter and his motivations became known.

This brings us to account for what the right wing disinformation machine got wrong about the Brown Shooting: EVERYTHING

It's remarkable how badly the RW accounts that ginned up hysteria around the Brown shooting were wrong about everything both on social media and on here.

• The killer did not shout "Allahu Akbar!" - started by Sayaras
• The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by DonGlock26 and Votto
• The killer did not shoot up that economics class because it was taught by a Jewish professor.
• The killer did not shoot up Brown because of its Israel policies - started by Robert Urbanek
• The killer was not a Palestinian student, or Muslim. Suggested by so many people its hard to @ them all.
• Brown University did not cover up evidence related to the killing in an attempt to protect a political hit or one of its students. Wild Bill Kelsoe
• Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor, was not killed because he was Jewish or made pro-Israel statements. In fact, there's no evidence he was Jewish.
• Their conspiracy theories were fabricated and were wrong from top to bottom.

Most shootings are by blacks in democrat cities. They create 53% of all gun homicide

 

[JoeB131]

Most shootings are by blacks in democrat cities. They create 53% of all gun homicide

We aren't talking about "Most homicides", guy, we are talking about this one, where a crazy student shot up his old university.

100% of gun homicides are because someone who shouldn't have a gun had a gun.

 

[1srelluc]

So now that Ella Cook was just the 15,000th victim of gun violence this year and not the second or third victim of left wing violence or the 30th of right wing violence the right wing outrage machine no longer cares about her death. Her twitter mentions plummeted once the shooter and his motivations became known.

This brings us to account for what the right wing disinformation machine got wrong about the Brown Shooting: EVERYTHING

It's remarkable how badly the RW accounts that ginned up hysteria around the Brown shooting were wrong about everything both on social media and on here.

• The killer did not shout "Allahu Akbar!" - started by Sayaras
• The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by DonGlock26 and Votto
• The killer did not shoot up that economics class because it was taught by a Jewish professor.
• The killer did not shoot up Brown because of its Israel policies - started by Robert Urbanek
• The killer was not a Palestinian student, or Muslim. Suggested by so many people its hard to @ them all.
• Brown University did not cover up evidence related to the killing in an attempt to protect a political hit or one of its students. Wild Bill Kelsoe
• Nuno Loureiro, the MIT professor, was not killed because he was Jewish or made pro-Israel statements. In fact, there's no evidence he was Jewish.
• Their conspiracy theories were fabricated and were wrong from top to bottom.

OK Foghorn.

I said all along that it was Musthaben Someotherguy.

No plate of crow for me as he was a foreign national.

 

[EMH]

The entire Brown U hierarchy, including security, was behind this hit.

The left believes it has the right to murder those who disagree with the left...

New survey reveals disturbing trend in support of political violence

A new report reveals a disturbing trend in support of political violence.

cbsaustin.com

 

[Hafar1014]

We aren't talking about "Most homicides", guy, we are talking about this one, where a crazy student shot up his old university.

100% of gun homicides are because someone who shouldn't have a gun had a gun.

The issue of total gun shootings was raised and it needed context. Take the gun away and you still have the killer able to act. You accomplish nothing.
What kind of gun did Timothy McVeigh use or the Boston marathon bombers. Anyone can make a pipe bomb or run people over with a car
Legal guns stop over 1 million violent crimes in any year. CDC

 

[buckeye]

Her twitter mentions plummeted once the shooter and his motivations became known.

We have no idea what the killer's motivations were.

You really have a very bad habit of making up stories. What's wrong with you?

 

[Hafar1014]

We have no idea what the killer's motivations were.

You really have a very bad habit of making up stories. What's wrong with you?

IN many cases of killings like these suicide is the outcome. There is definitely a mental illness aspect here

 

[1srelluc]

We have no idea what the killer's motivations were.

No shit, they tied this one up, put a bow on it, and memory holed it.

They are calling the whole thing an anomaly.

MSN

 

[DonGlock26]

• The killer did not target Ella Cook. - started by DonGlock26 and Votto

What was his motive?

 

[1srelluc]

What was his motive?

Or that is what they want you to believe.

 

[Norm Paperman]

Legal guns stop over 1 million violent crimes in any year. CDC

You of course have a link to this that you will provide?

 

[buckeye]

IN many cases of killings like these suicide is the outcome. There is definitely a mental illness aspect here

I have no information to suggest this is wrong but the fact is we don't yet know.

And I'd suggest that there is a mental illness aspect to just about every mass shooting.

 

[1srelluc]

You of course have a link to this that you will provide?

Guns Prevent Thousands of Crimes Every Day, Research Shows

The Center for Disease Control, in a report ordered by President Obama in 2012 following the Sandy Hook Massacre, estimated that the number of crimes prevented by guns could be as high as 3 million annually, or some 8,200 every day. And there is plenty more evidence showing that guns keep...

fee.org

 

[Norm Paperman]

Guns Prevent Thousands of Crimes Every Day, Research Shows

The Center for Disease Control, in a report ordered by President Obama in 2012 following the Sandy Hook Massacre, estimated that the number of crimes prevented by guns could be as high as 3 million annually, or some 8,200 every day. And there is plenty more evidence showing that guns keep...

fee.org

Thanks, still waiting on the link to the CDC report as was stated in the post I responded to.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Thanks, still waiting on the link to the CDC report as was stated in the post I responded to.

https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/18319/chapter/3#12

Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals


National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6797.

 

[Hafar1014]

I have no information to suggest this is wrong but the fact is we don't yet know.

And I'd suggest that there is a mental illness aspect to just about every mass shooting.

Since he killed himself thats evidence of mental illness. We dont know why he chose the targets.
Most mass shootings are black gang related. Mental illness is not involved.
School and workplace shootings all involve mental illness. We see PTSD psychosis or antisocial personality(psychopath)

 

[1srelluc]

Thanks, still waiting on the link to the CDC report as was stated in the post I responded to.

If you doubt the objectivity of the site above, it’s worth pointing out that the Center for Disease Control, in a report ordered by President Obama in 2012 following the Sandy Hook Massacre, estimated that the number of crimes prevented by guns could be even higher—as many as 3 million annually, or some 8,200 every day.

 

[Norm Paperman]

https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/18319/chapter/3#12

Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals


National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6797.

Defensive Use of Guns

Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million (Kleck, 2001a), in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008 (BJS, 2010). On the other hand, some scholars point to a radically lower estimate of only 108,000 annual defensive uses based on the National Crime Victimization Survey (Cook et al., 1997). The variation in these numbers remains a controversy in the field. The estimate of 3 million defensive uses per year is based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys. The former estimate of 108,000 is difficult to interpret because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6797.

Thanks for the link. Still nothing about the CDC saying what the person I responded to claimed.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Thanks for the link. Still nothing about the CDC saying what the person I responded to claimed.

The link I posted is the CDC report.