What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com

[whitehall]

The shooting by a deranged man, who once ran for office as a democrat, brings up an interesting point that low information lefties have either been unaware of or ignored for years. The KKK membership did (and still does) consist of democrats. Just as all mass shootings in modern history were perpetrated by left wing democrats, the Ks. shootings were the result of left wing (including media Matters) anti-Semitic propaganda directed against prominent Jews especially the Koch brothers. The fact that the maniac was a neo-nazi is indicative of the fact that the radical left was and is closely aligned with Nazism and anti-Semitism.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Most folks get it. I think what is being bandied about here tagging Frasier as a Democrat is simply a preemptive move to counter the Kidrocks for the board expected political point scoring assault attempting to tie this psycho to the right.

I'm pretty sure everyone gets the fact that this loony was the fringe of the fringe, and no political party wanted the least bit to do with him.

Preemptive? Come on. That is giving some idiots here a pass.

Let's agree on something.

The guy is a white supremacist and an anti-Semite whose actions yesterday were motivated by his deranged political ideology.

True?

Partially.

The guy is a white supremacist and an anti-Semite whose actions yesterday were motivated by his psychopathic antisemitism.

Great! We agree.

What else can we agree on?

 

[LoneLaugher]

The shooting by a deranged man, who once ran for office as a democrat, brings up an interesting point that low information lefties have either been unaware of or ignored for years. The KKK membership did (and still does) consist of democrats. Just as all mass shootings in modern history were perpetrated by left wing democrats, the Ks. shootings were the result of left wing (including media Matters) anti-Semitic propaganda directed against prominent Jews especially the Koch brothers. The fact that the maniac was a neo-nazi is indicative of the fact that the radical left was and is closely aligned with Nazism and anti-Semitism.

Are you a Democrat?

 

[Antares]

Preemptive? Come on. That is giving some idiots here a pass.

Let's agree on something.

The guy is a white supremacist and an anti-Semite whose actions yesterday were motivated by his deranged political ideology.

True?

Racism and Anti Semitism are not Political ideologies.

You are great for parsing.....when it suits you. Wasting time and slowing the conversation down are things you like doing. We get it.

You know that this asshole based his politics on his bigotry. To him....his actions were political. Idiot.

No, to YOU they were.....and to boot you choose to ignore the fact that he indeed ran as a Democrat AND as a Repub AND as an Independent...sorry kid, you are as blind and twisted inside as he is.

Tell me...how many Jews were killed in Russia?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Racism and Anti Semitism are not Political ideologies.

You are great for parsing.....when it suits you. Wasting time and slowing the conversation down are things you like doing. We get it.

You know that this asshole based his politics on his bigotry. To him....his actions were political. Idiot.

No, to YOU they were.....and to boot you choose to ignore the fact that he indeed ran as a Democrat AND as a Repub AND as an Independent...sorry kid, you are as blind and twisted inside as he is.

Tell me...how many Jews were killed in Russia?

Clearly, party affiliation means nothing to him. His political ideology is shaped by bigotry. Why obfuscate?

 

[Antares]

You are great for parsing.....when it suits you. Wasting time and slowing the conversation down are things you like doing. We get it.

You know that this asshole based his politics on his bigotry. To him....his actions were political. Idiot.

No, to YOU they were.....and to boot you choose to ignore the fact that he indeed ran as a Democrat AND as a Repub AND as an Independent...sorry kid, you are as blind and twisted inside as he is.

Tell me...how many Jews were killed in Russia?

Clearly, party affiliation means nothing to him. His political ideology is shaped by bigotry. Why obfuscate?

Which you in your abject partisanship wish to ascribe to the Republican part of him.

And all the while you have no ability to even see your own bigotry.

 

[LoneLaugher]

No, to YOU they were.....and to boot you choose to ignore the fact that he indeed ran as a Democrat AND as a Repub AND as an Independent...sorry kid, you are as blind and twisted inside as he is.

Tell me...how many Jews were killed in Russia?

Clearly, party affiliation means nothing to him. His political ideology is shaped by bigotry. Why obfuscate?

Which you in your abject partisanship wish to ascribe to the Republican part of him.

And all the while you have no ability to even see your own bigotry.

You read my words saying that? Or....are you assuming?

You bore me.

 

[joejonbob]

The SPLC is a hate group itself. They have an agenda. Admittedly they directly do not use guns to kill people, but they use their government funding, and curiously close relationship to the FBI to assassinate peoples character, and fuel societal hatred.

They are just as much, if not more inflammatory as any of the groups they so adamantly deplore. When doing something as little as not agreeing with Israeli foreign policy gets you labeled an anti-smite, or disagreeing with abortion tags you as a possible terrorist by these folks, sorry if I cannot help but laugh.

That being said, this was a tragedy. Those three people didn't need to die. Unfortunately it won't be the last time a human dies over ideology, culture, or race.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com

"None of this is to suggest that the radical right in America does not remain highly dangerous," the SPLC warned in its report earlier this year. "The weakening of groups often has the effect of fostering, rather than retarding, followers' decisions to finally act out violently."

"Despite the decline, there are still enormous numbers of radical groups operating -- more than 2,000 of them, including hate and Patriot organizations. The single most important factor that has driven the growth of the radical right over the last five years, the ongoing demographic change to a non-white majority over the course of the next three decades, is still a source of enormous angst and rage for many."

I think what bit has proven, once again, is that you people are the most dangerous people on the planet. You have to blame someone else even if that person agreed with your philosophy at the core.

You blame the right for being nazi's when the left are for all of the nazi stances.

You blame the right for being gun nuts out to kill people when it's only your kind that shoots innocent people based on ideology.

So who are the radical groups here? The right wingers you like to paint as violent and wanting to kill people or you on the left that actually ******* kill people?

 

[Agit8r]

You blame the right for being nazi's when the left are for all of the nazi stances.

really?

"The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and co-operation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life"
-- Adolf Hitler; from national proclamation (Feb. 1, 1933)

"Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creation which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle"
-- Adolf Hitler; from speech to the NS Frauenschaft (Sept. 8, 1934)

"Secular schools can never be tolerated because such schools have no religious instruction, and a general moral instruction without a religious foundation is built on air; consequently, all character training and religion must be derived from faith"
-- Adolf Hitler; at Nazi-Vatican Concordat (Apr. 26, 1933)

"I am also religious, profoundly religious on the inside, and I believe that Providence weighs human beings. Those who do not pass the trials imposed by Providence, who are broken by them, are not destined by Providence for greater things. It is a natural necessity that only the strong remain after this selection."
-- Adolf Hitler; from Munich Löwenbräukeller (November 8, 1943)

 

[Esmeralda]

Indeed THEY can label themselves anything they wish. And saying it doesn't make it so.

Neither does YOUR proclaiming that they are "right wing fascists."

In truth, they were a very odd admixture of somewhat competing socio-political and economic governance theories all wrapped up in vile, evil, murderous bigotry.

But, your claim that they "fit the definition" of "right wing fascists" is just so much baseless blather. YOUR saying it is convenient for a propagandizing leftist, but not in the slightest bit supported or even reasonable.

The whole world knows they were r-wing Nazi fascists. The whole world records as such. The whole world knows except for you r-wing extremists here on this forum and elsewhere.

That's a lie...just like saying the Science Is Settled on Global Warming is a lie.

 

[Unkotare]

The whole world knows they were r-wing Nazi fascists. The whole world records as such. The whole world knows except for you r-wing extremists here on this forum and elsewhere.

That's a lie...just like saying the Science Is Settled on Global Warming is a lie.

It's nice that you find lies humorous. I find the lie you keep repeating about overpopulation to be pretty funny.

 

[CaféAuLait]

Want proof that the radical-right still remains highly dangerous? Killings at the Kansas Jewish sites should suffice. Read on...






What the killings at Kansas Jewish sites say about U.S. hate groups - CNN.com* * * *

In a word: nothing. The shooter was a ******* Democrap.

Go figure.

The shooter was a radical-right wing hate monger killer.

A KKK member, a Neo Nazi type hate monger?

Homosexuals were the co-founders of Nazism. But I suppose that doesn't matter does it?

Ernst Julius Günther Röhm (28 November 1887 – 2 July 1934) was a German officer in the Bavarian Army and later an early Nazi leader. He was a co-founder of the Sturmabteilung ("Storm Battalion"; SA),[1] the Nazi Party militia, and later was its commander.

.

SA intimidation contributed to the rise of the Nazis and the violent suppression of left-wing parties during electoral campaigns, but its reputation for street violence and heavy drinking was a hindrance, as was the open homosexuality of Röhm and other SA leaders such as his deputy Edmund Heines

"[Röhm's] chiefs, men of the rank of Gruppenfuehrer or Obergruppenfuehrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual, he had no chance of advancement."[7] In 1931, the Münchener Post, a Social Democratic newspaper, obtained and published Röhm's letters to a friend discussing his homosexual affairs

Ernst Röhm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


He and many of his men were gay. And I guess you will still try to spin it that all the Nazi's were 'right wing'.

History tells us many fascist's were gay as well.

The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists


Johann Hari: The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists


Some history sucks for many who don't like the truth.

 

[Esmeralda]

Ummm that they need to raise their cull factor, dude was a hard core Democrat.

The shooter was a Republican... ran for the U.S. Senate in the North Carolina primary election in 1986 as a REPUBLICAN. The dude actually got 6662 Republicans votes.

He ran as a Democrat before that. And in 2006, he ran as a Democrat in the Congressional Primary race in MO.

It is not important what he was 20 years ago, it is important what he is now: a right wing, racist, white supremacist.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Uhm... you do realize that Hitler & the Nazi's were socialists, right?

Yes... r-wing extremist Nazi socialists.

Hitler hated blacks, jews, homosexuals, liberals, and the free-press. He loved guns though. Sound familiar?

Hitler allowed Jews to have guns?

 

[Sallow]

Uhm... you do realize that Hitler & the Nazi's were socialists, right?

And North Korea is a Democratic Republic.

Says so in the name..right?

 

[Unkotare]

The shooter was a Republican... ran for the U.S. Senate in the North Carolina primary election in 1986 as a REPUBLICAN. The dude actually got 6662 Republicans votes.

He ran as a Democrat before that. And in 2006, he ran as a Democrat in the Congressional Primary race in MO.

It is not important what he was 20 years ago, it is important what he is now: a right wing, racist, white supremacist.

LOL. Liberals just can't let go of their delusion of purity and innocence from the left, reality be damned.

 

[Sallow]

Uhm... you do realize that Hitler & the Nazi's were socialists, right?

Yes... r-wing extremist Nazi socialists.

Hitler hated blacks, jews, homosexuals, liberals, and the free-press. He loved guns though. Sound familiar?

Hitler allowed Jews to have guns?

Christian Germans could keep their guns.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

They can self proclaim themselves to be anything; however, nothing they did or stood for fits the definition of being what we consider liberal, left wing attributes.

So, trying to say they are what you all consider as socialists is just complete disingenuousness: no one buys it but yourselves. Pathetic.

However, the do very much fit the definition of right wing fascists.

Indeed THEY can label themselves anything they wish. And saying it doesn't make it so.

Neither does YOUR proclaiming that they are "right wing fascists."

In truth, they were a very odd admixture of somewhat competing socio-political and economic governance theories all wrapped up in vile, evil, murderous bigotry.

But, your claim that they "fit the definition" of "right wing fascists" is just so much baseless blather. YOUR saying it is convenient for a propagandizing leftist, but not in the slightest bit supported or even reasonable.

The whole world knows they were r-wing Nazi fascists. The whole world records as such. The whole world knows except for you r-wing extremists here on this forum and elsewhere.

No you shit for brain propagandized worthless rat ****.. The whole world "knows" no such thing.

Some vapid rat-faced ignorant ***** like you and Ezzy have heard that nonsense and choose to accept it.

But it's false.

They were fascists, yes. But they were no more "right wing" than they were "left wing."

Your boundless ignorance is formed by what you are told to believe, and what you wish to believe. Since you are a drooling simpleton easily-misled lolberal, you have merely chosen poorly. No surprise.

 

[BlindBoo]

way before that, but they did remove all pretense in that election.

Well in 2002 they were shilling for the Bush led invasion and occupation of Iraq, full steam(ing piles of shit) ahead.

They barely questioned Papa Bush and the need to use force against Iraq. Nothing on the lead up to the Iraq/Kuwait crisis, which had been brewing for months yet the US Press ignored it. So when GWH Bush announce that it was a surprise attack that day, to Americans, it was.

No it wasn't. Look champ, this stuff was not long enough ago for you to lie so blatantly about it. Maybe you were stoned for all of 2002, but the press covered the increasing likelihood and build-up of forces prior to the war EXTENSIVELY. The media has been biased toward the left for a looooong time now.

The MSM was pro Iraq Invasion. MSNBC fired one of their most popular shows host because he was anti-war. The Media is more about what the statist/corporations want. They know how to play the American Sheeple like a harp. 70% believed that Saddam had a role in 9-11. Why, because they all parroted the talking points put out by the Bush Administration, without question, for over a year with regards to demonizing Saddam and Iraq. Only after the situation in Iraq became FUBR did they start publishing opposing viewpoints with earnest.