What the hell is "stochastic violence"?

[MaryL]

And WHY is that term only applicable only to Republicans, whites or anyone that disagrees with Democrats? But hey, Lib Dems & "Social justice advocates" supporting BLM and media anti police rhetoric and incited riots in 2020 across America:

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's only the MAGA that demonize its opponents to the level of inciting violence.

 

[jotathought]

 

[MaryL]

Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2.

This post is confusing. Edward slow poke does have issues, But I digress.

 

[jotathought]

It's only the MAGA that demonize its opponents to the level of inciting violence.

Like what? I know .. I know .. January 6th What others?

 

[MarathonMike]

It's only the MAGA that demonize its opponents to the level of inciting violence.

What is "the MAGA"? Have you created a new fantasy orange monster that scares you at night?

 

[Esdraelon]

Hmmm. It seems to me that someone should attach a picture of Biden's red-themed fearmongering speech about maga next to this definition. Dems aren't very self-aware.

 

[Esdraelon]

What is "the MAGA"? Have you created a new fantasy orange monster that scares you at night?

Dude checks under his bed for it every night...

 

[Crepitus]

And WHY is that term only applicable only to Republicans, whites or anyone that disagrees with Democrats? But hey, Lib Dems & "Social justice advocates" supporting BLM and media anti police rhetoric and incited riots in 2020 across America:

View attachment 904640

A. It's a big word meaning that you egged people on without directly instructing them. It lets people (and I use the term loosely since they are most tRumplings or tRump himself) say things like "those second amendment people, they might be able to do something" without being on tape saying "shoot them now"


B, It doesn't only apply to republicans, they just practice it regularly where as normal people don't do shit like that.

 

[Crepitus]

This post is confusing

Not surprising, there were lots of big words there.

I posted using smaller words with tRumplings in mind.

 

[Crepitus]

What is "the MAGA"?

You. You are the MAGA.

 

[MaryL]

Copilot
Stochastic violence is a form of demonization in which false and inflammatory propaganda is spread about a target person or group. This propaganda induces some tiny percentage of gullible people (which, given the large demographic, only requires a small percentage) to act violently in retribution against the target1.
The term stochastic terrorism is closely related. It refers to the public demonization of a person or group, resulting in the incitement of a violent act. While the specifics of the act cannot be predicted precisely, the statistical probability of violence increases due to the rhetoric used. In other words, the rhetoric indirectly encourages random acts of violence without explicitly instructing anyone to commit them23.
For example, when a leader or organization uses hostile or hateful language against a group through mass media, it doesn’t explicitly call for violence. However, an individual, feeling threatened, might be motivated to carry out a violent act as a result of this rhetoric. The stochastic nature of this terrorism lies in the statistical likelihood of violence being incited by such demonization2.

A. It's a big word meaning that you egged people on without directly instructing them. It lets people (and I use the term loosely since they are most tRumplings or tRump himself) say things like "those second amendment people, they might be able to do something" without being on tape saying "shoot them now"


B, It doesn't only apply to republicans, they just practice it regularly where as normal people don't do shit like that.

Nice try. Democommies actually, in real time, (not some politically ideological contrived theoretical subjective maybe sorta perhaps scenario,) BUT actually drove that huge and faulty narrative that cause anti-police anti white race riots in 2020. And Democommies and their apologists aren't gonna weasel their way out of THAT.

 

[okfine]

You. You are the MAGA.

aka little MAGAmikie

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

This post is confusing. Edward slow poke does have issues, But I digress.

Molasses Mary complains I answered her question. But I disgress.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Like what? I know .. I know .. January 6th What others?

Charlottesville, Oakland, mass shootings.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nice try. Democommies actually, in real time, (not some politically ideological contrived theoretical subjective maybe sorta perhaps scenario,) BUT actually drove that huge and faulty narrative that cause anti-police anti white race riots in 2020. And Democommies and their apologists aren't gonna weasel their way out of THAT.

So when confronted iwth objective facts, you dive into the conspiracy tank.

 

[jotathought]

Charlottesville, Oakland, mass shootings.

Trump incited those outcomes? Provide some specifics instead of dumb, leftist talking points.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump incited those outcomes? Provide some specifics instead of dumb, leftist talking points.

You asked for right wing actions. You got them. Your question is irrelevant, as usual.

 

[jotathought]

You asked for right wing actions. You got them. Your question is irrelevant, as usual.

Then your examples are worthless .. as usual. Cheers!