What should be the penalty for destroying priceless works of art?

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Do you have evidence that it is "an irreplaceable museum piece"?

.


This leftist shit gets funnier by the minute. Y'all are desperate and the next couple days are going to put hair triggers on you.








.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

how do you replace a one of a kind hundreds of yrs old??

Do you have evidence that it is "a one of a kind hundreds of yrs old" piece?

Hint: The subject died less than 100 years ago.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

This leftist shit gets funnier by the minute. Y'all are desperate and the next couple days are going to put hair triggers on you.

So that's a "no"?

 

[jackflash]

If it's 'priceless' and you put it where people can destroy it easily, that fault lies with the moron who allowed it.

I agree. Housing the priceless artworks in a protective encasement with shatter proof glass & proper non reflective(bounce lighting etc.) lighting should insure the safety of the art piece in question.

 

[Foxfyre]

Do you have evidence that it is "an irreplaceable museum piece"?

Well yeah. The artist has been dead for 87 years so I've heard.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So that's a "no"?

.















.

 

[Foxfyre]

Well, isn't this being done by the lefty "peaceful protesters"?

Yep. Of course the painting in the OP happens to be in London, but those defacing, destroying, demanding removal of historical works of art in this country are no different.

 

[eagle1462010]

When people turn into animals and destroy......there is only one way to restore order and stop it

 

[progressive hunter]

Are you an idiot? That's rhetorical. The owner didn't hang it on the street you fucking moron. They put it on a wall and invited anyone who wanted to get near to do exactly that. Talk about need to think before you comment.

you said nothing about being on or off the streets,,

you said "put it where people can destroy it,,

you walking the streets makes you easy to kill,,

sounds like youre the one that needs to think before you talk,,

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Well yeah. The artist has been dead for 87 years so I've heard.

Which artist? The one whose "place in American history" has included a "place in our landscape for decades"? Or the Hungarian noble whose piece hanging in a British university was recently vandalized? Because they would not be the same people.

 

[progressive hunter]

Do you have evidence that it is "a one of a kind hundreds of yrs old" piece?

Hint: The subject died less than 100 years ago.

do you have any its not??

and if the artist is dead and the subject is dead that would make it irreplaceable wouldnt it??

 

[Stormy Daniels]

do you have any its not??

Well, for starters, Balfour wasn't even alive yet "hundreds of years" ago.

 

[progressive hunter]

Well, for starters, Balfour wasn't even alive yet "hundreds of years" ago.

how can it be replaced if both the subject and artist are dead??

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

do you have any its not??

and if the artist is dead and the subject is dead that would make it irreplaceable wouldnt it??

.

Oh, yeah. They stopped teaching logic and critical thinking in school quite a while ago. Those are completely alien concepts to leftists.

And what's funny is they believe they are skills that they will never need to have.


.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

how can it be replaced if both the subject and artist are dead??

Easy. You get some art student to make a copy. A Da Vinci is valuable because it's a Da Vinci. But not all artwork is particularly valuable or noteworthy.

Again, I do not approve of what this guy did. But it needs to be kept in perspective.

 

[progressive hunter]

Easy. You get some art student to make a copy. A Da Vinci is valuable because it's a Da Vinci. But not all artwork is particularly valuable or noteworthy.

Again, I do not approve of what this guy did. But it needs to be kept in perspective.

thats the opposite of a replacement,,

 

[The Irish Ram]

They need to be placed in a cell until the picture is slowly, painstakingly restored to its former glory. If that is impossible, the cell door remains locked...

 

[Foxfyre]

Which artist? The one whose "place in American history" has included a "place in our landscape for decades"? Or the Hungarian noble whose piece hanging in a British university was recently vandalized? Because they would not be the same people.

Come on. Nobody is that dense. The artist who painted the painting died in 1937. And therefore it is irreplaceable.

 

[Paleman]

If it's 'priceless' and you put it where people can destroy it easily, that fault lies with the moron who allowed it.

That is a dumbass viewpoint from a Wisconsinite. Would you consider it your fault when some moron steals your cow from a wide-open field? You put it there instead of locking it up in the barn. GD leftists never hold the bad guy responsible.

 

[Concerned American]

If it's 'priceless' and you put it where people can destroy it easily, that fault lies with the moron who allowed it.

That is the thinking that leads to this type of behavior. The US at one time was a place where you could go and appreciate works of art---like can be done in places like the Louvre. It is a shame that people cannot view these masterpieces up close to appreciate just how great they are. It seems our society has produced more cretins than civilized folks.