What "puzzles" me about Trump's attack on Judge Curiel...

nat4900

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2015
42,021
5,968
1,870
Lets say that Trump were to become president (highly [and luckily] unlikely) and Trump decided to fulfill his moronic promise to build that "beautiful" wall.......AND that folks objecting to such a wall were to sue Trump's decision and it would wind up in the courts......

THEN, one could almost....ALMOST.....side with Trump that if the decision on the legality of the wall rested with a judge such as Curiel and his potential biases.....

BUT, Curiel is hearing pleads regarding ANOTHER of Trump's screw ups about his faux "university" scam and to claim bias on that account is insane and only emphasizes Trump's xenophobia and, YES, latent racism.
 
Last edited:
One wouldn't almost side with Trump. One would definitely side with Trump. What the low information left is ignoring is that most Americans want well regulated borders. Apparently the parents of judge in question were illegal criminal aliens and the judge belongs to a race based organization that endorses illegal immigration and open borders. He should recuse himself from the case because he is obviously biased against Trump.
 
Lets say that Trump were to become president (highly [and luckily] unlikely) and Trump decided to fulfill his moronic promise to build that "beautiful" wall.......AND that folks objecting to such a wall were to sue Trump's decision and it would wind up in the courts......

THEN, one could almost....ALMOST.....side with Trump that if the decision on the legality of the wall rested with a judge such as Curiel and his potential biases.....

BUT, Curiel is hearing pleads regarding ANOTHER of Trump's screw ups about his faux "university" scam and to claim bias on that account is insane and only emphasizes Trump's xenophobia and, YES, latent racism.
--------------------------------------- as the wize Latina on the supreme court said , Mexicans think differently than gringos . Course she used different words Nat .
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
So, a judge of Italian descent could NOT ever hear a case against the Mafia.....and the fact that Scalia was a member of the Italian Anti-Defamation League was, a de facto racist?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
--------------------------------------- as the wize Latina on the supreme court said , Mexicans think differently than gringos . Course she used different words Nat .


......and then you morons actually have the nerve to openly state that it is Obama who divides this country among racial lines?

For every day that this screw up by Trump stays in the news, my guess that even that 20% of Latinos who were considering voting for Trump, dwindles even more.
 
Lets say that Trump were to become president (highly [and luckily] unlikely) and Trump decided to fulfill his moronic promise to build that "beautiful" wall.......AND that folks objecting to such a wall were to sue Trump's decision and it would wind up in the courts......

THEN, one could almost....ALMOST.....side with Trump that if the decision on the legality of the wall rested with a judge such as Curiel and his potential biases.....

BUT, Curiel is hearing pleads regarding ANOTHER of Trump's screw ups about his faux "university" scam and to claim bias on that account is insane and only emphasizes Trump's xenophobia and, YES, latent racism.


Lots of puzzling things about T-rump. He shows classic signs of mental instability. He has to have someone who will tell him that insulting the judge will hurt his case as well as expose him as a spoiled brat, but he can't help himself. He's like a toddler in mid tantrum. He just can't stop. Not the kind of person I want to have in control of our nuclear arsenal.
 
All Trump did was expose Curiel for being La Raza and that the two legal teams representing the plaintiffs gave the Clintons almost a million dollars in speaking fees.

This lawsuit is a political hit job using the judiciary. Typical D tactic.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Lots of puzzling things about T-rump. He shows classic signs of mental instability. He has to have someone who will tell him that insulting the judge will hurt his case as well as expose him as a spoiled brat, but he can't help himself. He's like a toddler in mid tantrum. He just can't stop. Not the kind of person I want to have in control of our nuclear arsenal.


True....I first just dismissed Trump as just another narcissistic rich boy with daddy's money....but now he is showing deep-rooted sociopathic tendencies that won't allow saner people around him to stop him from jumping off a cliff of his own making.
 
All Trump did was expose Curiel for being La Raza

Every time I think you retards have reached the bottom of stupidity, you surprise me. Like thinking the judge belongs to the National Council of La Raza.

I am simply astonished you parrot this blatant lie as fact.
 
Trump is going to build a wall and make Judge Curiel pay for it
 
So, a judge of Italian descent could NOT ever hear a case against the Mafia.....and the fact that Scalia was a member of the Italian Anti-Defamation League was, a de facto racist?
If the judge's parents were actual members of the Mafia, would you have confidence in his/her rulings?
 
All Trump did was expose Curiel for being La Raza and that the two legal teams representing the plaintiffs gave the Clintons almost a million dollars in speaking fees.

This lawsuit is a political hit job using the judiciary. Typical D tactic.

What does someone contributing to the Clintons have to do with a bogus university?
 
So, a judge of Italian descent could NOT ever hear a case against the Mafia.....and the fact that Scalia was a member of the Italian Anti-Defamation League was, a de facto racist?
If the judge's parents were actual members of the Mafia, would you have confidence in his/her rulings?
And how does that apply to the judge?
 
All Trump did was expose Curiel for being La Raza and that the two legal teams representing the plaintiffs gave the Clintons almost a million dollars in speaking fees.

This lawsuit is a political hit job using the judiciary. Typical D tactic.


Throw all the mud you want hoping that it sticks (like: the judge is an anchor baby....the judge belongs to La Raza, and now, "the legal team of the plaintiffs are Clinton plants, etc.)

Bottom line: Trump had ....maybe.....20% of Latinos backing him.....After this latest fiasco, Trump can eat all the tacos his fat belly can digest, but virtually NO Latino/Hispanic will vote for him......and good thing.
 
All Trump did was expose Curiel for being La Raza and that the two legal teams representing the plaintiffs gave the Clintons almost a million dollars in speaking fees.
Donald Trump and his entire family donated to all of Clinton's campaigns!
 
So, a judge of Italian descent could NOT ever hear a case against the Mafia.....and the fact that Scalia was a member of the Italian Anti-Defamation League was, a de facto racist?
If the judge's parents were actual members of the Mafia, would you have confidence in his/her rulings?
And how does that apply to the judge?
Did you miss the context of the post to which I was responding?
 
Lets say that Trump were to become president (highly [and luckily] unlikely) and Trump decided to fulfill his moronic promise to build that "beautiful" wall.......AND that folks objecting to such a wall were to sue Trump's decision and it would wind up in the courts......

THEN, one could almost....ALMOST.....side with Trump that if the decision on the legality of the wall rested with a judge such as Curiel and his potential biases.....

BUT, Curiel is hearing pleads regarding ANOTHER of Trump's screw ups about his faux "university" scam and to claim bias on that account is insane and only emphasizes Trump's xenophobia and, YES, latent racism.


Say Gnat, is it true that Jude Curiel is part of the "Aryan Lawyers Association?"

Isn't THAT racism on it's face?
 
So, a judge of Italian descent could NOT ever hear a case against the Mafia.....and the fact that Scalia was a member of the Italian Anti-Defamation League was, a de facto racist?
If the judge's parents were actual members of the Mafia, would you have confidence in his/her rulings?
And how does that apply to the judge?
Did you miss the context of the post to which I was responding?
How does that apply to the judge?

Please explain how the judge's parents were similar to being in the Mafia.

This should be fun.
 
Lets say that Trump were to become president (highly [and luckily] unlikely) and Trump decided to fulfill his moronic promise to build that "beautiful" wall.......AND that folks objecting to such a wall were to sue Trump's decision and it would wind up in the courts......

THEN, one could almost....ALMOST.....side with Trump that if the decision on the legality of the wall rested with a judge such as Curiel and his potential biases.....

BUT, Curiel is hearing pleads regarding ANOTHER of Trump's screw ups about his faux "university" scam and to claim bias on that account is insane and only emphasizes Trump's xenophobia and, YES, latent racism.


Say Gnat, is it true that Jude Curiel is part of the "Aryan Lawyers Association?"

Isn't THAT racism on it's face?
Hey dumbshit. There's a difference between an organization dedicated to racial equality and one dedicated to racial superiority.
 

Forum List

Back
Top