Regardless of gender, anyone reading the op and subsequent posts here would agree that a distorted perception of the female population is evidenced.
So being acutely aware of unjust and unfair things women are doing is distorted perception? So if one doesn't kowtow to females sexual wickedness they have to get treatment? What exactly in my posts do you fault as distorted perception of female population? You and your cahoots are doing something which is unacceptable and you should mend yourselves.
Yes, all things work themselves out. We just may not like the outcome, but there is a self compensating feature at work. If we make bad decisions we suffer consequences. This is how feedback works.
By divorce you mean? Isn't divorce a sign that marriage doesn't work, why even marry if you know it'll end up in divorce? Maybe the church should start refusing to marry couple, if the girl or woman involved is not a virgin. So who is responsible for a child's suffering, in this example, Anna Faith's son? Women put their sons in a situation which a man can never put his daughter in.
As to your assertion that religion treat men more harshly than women for sexual misdeeds, I see it the exact opposite way. Women have been treated more harshly by religion than men. The woman at the well with Christ was alone because she was scorned for having too many husbands.
It has been men throughout history who have exhibited "sexual wickedness," i.e. enjoying sex outside of marriage with little or no punishment, and without any nasty names being called them, while religions have come after women and dealt out harsh punishments to them, even execution, for the same or lesser misconduct. What country are you in that the opposite has been true?
Rubbish! It has been and it still is men who suffer immensely more for their sexual activities than women. Women even now are not thought of as sexual beings. As both of you are replying to the same thing, I'll reply to you both at once:
Do you remember reading or hearing a Jesus Christ's saying which goes something like "a man who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery"? Has Jesus Christ uttered a similar saying against women? That a woman who looks at a man with lust has committed adultery? Is this not men being treated harshly than women? In all probability, Jesus Christ being a man, would have thought women were not even capable of being sexual, heck even until 19th century, people thought women were asexual being.
In your country, there was a time when black men were tortured and killed for even looking at a white woman, something similar didn't happen with black women, black women weren't killed because they looked at white men.
Even now, in almost all countries, only boys and men are thought to commit sexual crimes, like rape, etc, that is why law related sexual crime is written with male pronouns, it assumes only the male gender can commit sexual crimes and female gender is the victim most of the time.
You just have to look at society to see that boys and men are punished more harshly than girls and women, boys and men look at girls and something is done, girls and women look at boys and men, and they are not even seen as committing any crime or wrongdoing.
If a boy or man is accused of anything, they are raped in prison by other boys and men, women don't run this risk.
Lysistrata, the sexual wickedness of men you are referring to, isn't of the same quality as women's.
The interesting thing is that the gap has closed in promiscuity. I'm not certain it is a good thing.
No, girls and women were always in the lead in promiscuity, this biased shows your deep hatred of men, you are deliberately not focusing on the girls and women involved in promiscuity. Even in olden days if a man was involved in promiscuity, it was mostly with women, so don't these women count? For as many men, there were probably more women.
