What Isn't Caused By Global Warming

[karpenter]

That you think thousands of peer reviewed and published scientific studies is no basis in reality just goes to show how out of touch you are with real science.

And Science Is What I Want To Know

How Long On The Charts Would It Take
And To Match What Temp In The Past 100yrs
To Declare A Reversal Of Trend

 

[Crick]

I already answered your question.

I am not a climate scientist and I'm sure you'd get a better answer from one of them. However, there is no threshold time. The longer that a specific trend continues, the greater the significance. I have heard, in discussions re the difference between climate and weather, that three months is the earliest one might be seeing climatic trends. An examination of the data on hand, though, show the scale of variations.

Listen to the Earth smash another global temperature record

Note the data trend after that localized peak about 1941. Global temperatures did not surpass that value for almost 40 years, yet global warming had not stopped and was actually accelerating.

 

[karpenter]

I already answered your question.

You Have Not Answered Any Questions

You Are Participating In A Tread-Worn Debate
That Is Not Pertinent To This Thread At All
Not Being A Climatologist Isn't Stopping You There

How Will We Know When Global Warming Has Stopped
What Would Your Chart Have To Look Like
And Over What Span Of Time

You Are Deliberately Not Answering Any Questions

 

[Pilot1]

We all agree the Climate changes naturally, and drastically over time. How can anyone tell, even the vaunted (but biased) scientific community tell what component of the change is NATURE, and what component of the change is MAN?

Answer that lefties. Why do you all also believe in all the other Socialist crap, if this isn't just one more wealth redistribution scheme? How come very few conservatives believe in it?

 

[karpenter]

And It's Changed From AGW To Climate Change
A Verbal Slight Of Tongue That Fools No One
We All Know What We're Talking About
And The Premise Behind It

 

[Crick]

I already answered your question.

You Have Not Answered Any Questions

You Are Participating In A Tread-Worn Debate
That Is Not Pertinent To This Thread At All
Not Being A Climatologist Isn't Stopping You There

How Will We Know When Global Warming Has Stopped
What Would Your Chart Have To Look Like
And Over What Span Of Time

You Are Deliberately Not Answering Any Questions

Okay, my answer, anally derived.

It would require a cooling trend for at least ten years. And, before that can happen, CO2 in the atmosphere will have to drop to levels approximating the pre-industrial 280 ppm and stay there for a few years. Have you ever seen this graphic?

These are GCM projections going out to the year 2300. The different colored lines are different emission scenarios - the matching regions are 2-sigma 'error bars' . The most optimistic, RCP 2.6, has GHG emissions peaking by 2050 at 3.0 W/m^2 and dropping to 2.6 W/m^2 by 2100. In the worst case, RCP 8.5, forcing reaches 8.5 W/m^2. Current radiative forcing is approximately 1.6 W/m^2 . Note with the exception of 2.6, none of these stop increasing, they only slow the rate at which they do so.