none of those numbers really matter.
What really matters is do you lean libertarian or authoritarian?
I disagree that Libertarian and Authoritarian are polar opposites.
I think we likely agree that Libertarian is non-coercive, and that is a good thing when possible.
But what is wrong about Authoritarian government is not that it is coercive, but that its coercive authority is arbitrary and self created, NOT based on the defense of inherent rights of individuals.
Coercive authority based on the defense of inherent individual rights is essential.
And the failure of Libertarians to protect the rights of individuals from things like corporate abuse, dooms Libertarianism.
Examples of how corporations can turn us into economic slaves are abundant.
Health insurance is an example, where these corporations have prevented access to necessary services unless you prepay over 10 times what the services are actually worth.
It is also obvious that corporations with a monopoly on capital can also do things like create a monopoly on housing, turning people essentially into feudal serfs to their landlords.
The dichotomy is more like Libertarian vs Protectionist.
It is more about having to deal with bureaucracy and power alone, or with collective bargaining.
And the reality is that I think all those purporting to support Libertarianism, actually support corporate authoritarianism, and are just hiding behind a fake label.
Individuals can not fight fairly against the huge power of corporations, so we need collective mechanisms to level the playing field. And that is not authoritarian, but simply the right thing to do, in order to balance the inherent authoritarian concentration of power that corporations have, due to their monopoly on wealth.